Paper · 2002 · Journal of Phytopathology

Incidence, Aggressiveness andIn PlantaInteractions ofBotrytis cinereaand other Filamentous Fungi Quiescent in Grape Berries and Dormant Buds in Central Washington State

F. M. Dugan; S. L. Lupien; G. G. Grove

6
claims
10
verbatim quotes
43
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Recovery of quiescent filamentous fungi from non‐symptomatic grape berries and dormant buds demonstrated dominance of Alternaria , Aureobasidium , Cladosporium , Ulocladium and other dematiaceous hyphomycetes. Up to 78% of berries contained fungi prior to harvest. Botrytis cinerea was recovered from 0.2 to 0.5% of surface‐disinfested berries just subsequent to fruit set, and 1.6–4.8% of surface‐disinfested, over‐wintered dormant buds. In laboratory inoculations of mature grape berries with strains of Alternaria , Aureobasidium , Cladosporium , Ulocladium and Botrytis , only the latter was aggressive in rotting berry fruits. Inoculations with B. cinerea alone and in combination with strains of Alternaria , Aureobasidium , Cladosporium and Ulocladium recovered from grape demonstrated that prior occupation of wound sites by the latter fungi resulted in reduced lesion size compared to inoculation with B. cinerea alone.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Alternaria, Aureobasidium, Cladosporium, Ulocladium, and other dematiaceous fungi dominated asymptomatic grape berries and buds.

Taxon
grapee0
Organ / stage
berries and dormant budse0
Outcome
dominance of Alternaria , Aureobasidium , Cladosporium , Ulocladium and other dematiaceous hyphomycetese0

Verbatim

e0

“Recovery of quiescent filamentous fungi from non‐symptomatic grape berries and dormant buds demonstrated dominance of Alternaria , Aureobasidium , Cladosporium , Ulocladium and other dematiaceous hyphomycetes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–217 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Up to 78% of grape berries contained fungi before harvest.

Taxon
grapet0
Outcome
berries contained fungie0
Value
Up to 78%e0

Verbatim

e0

“Up to 78% of berries contained fungi prior to harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 219–272 · show in text ↑
t0

“grape”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 110–115 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Botrytis cinerea was recovered from 0.2 to 0.5% of grape berries soon after fruit set.

Taxon
grapet0
Organ / stage
berriese0
Interactor
Botrytis cinereaBotrytis cinereae0pathogen
Outcome
Botrytis cinerea was recoverede0
Value
0.2 to 0.5%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Botrytis cinerea
Botrytis cinerea · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Botrytis cinerea was recovered from 0.2 to 0.5% of surface‐disinfested berries just subsequent to fruit set”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 274–381 · show in text ↑
t0

“grape”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 110–115 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Botrytis cinerea was recovered from 1.6–4.8% of overwintered dormant grape buds.

Taxon
grapet0
Outcome
surface‐disinfested, over‐wintered dormant budse0
Value
1.6–4.8%e0

Verbatim

e0

“1.6–4.8% of surface‐disinfested, over‐wintered dormant buds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 387–446 · show in text ↑
t0

“grape”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 110–115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Only Botrytis was aggressive in rotting mature grape berries among the inoculated genera.

Taxon
grapee0
Treatment
inoculations of mature grape berries with strains of Alternaria , Aureobasidium , Cladosporium , Ulocladium and Botrytise0
Interactor
BotrytisBotrytise0pathogen
Outcome
aggressive in rotting berry fruitse0
Comparator
Alternaria , Aureobasidium , Cladosporium , Ulocladiume0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Botrytis
Botrytis · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Rasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In laboratory inoculations of mature grape berries with strains of Alternaria , Aureobasidium , Cladosporium , Ulocladium and Botrytis , only the latter was aggressive in rotting berry fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 448–639 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Prior wound occupation by other grape fungi reduced Botrytis lesion size relative to Botrytis alone.

Taxon
grapee1
Treatment
prior occupation of wound sites by the latter fungie0
Interactor
B. cinereaBotrytis cinereae0pathogen
Outcome
lesion sizee0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
inoculation with B. cinerea alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Botrytis cinerea
Botrytis cinerea · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“prior occupation of wound sites by the latter fungi resulted in reduced lesion size compared to inoculation with B. cinerea alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 807–936 · show in text ↑
e1

“Inoculations with B. cinerea alone and in combination with strains of Alternaria , Aureobasidium , Cladosporium and Ulocladium recovered from grape demonstrated that prior occupation of wound sites by the latter fungi resulted in reduced lesion size compared to inoculation with B. cinerea alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 641–936 · show in text ↑

Botrytis · disease · VitisPositive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
See all 3 papers →

mechanical · Botrytis cinerea · VitisPositive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

inoculation · disease · VitisPositive and negative results

67 papers: 19 positive, 48 negative or no effect

47 papers in the same direction as this paper · 19 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

63 papers more in this group

See all 67 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.