Paper · 2015 · Phytopathology

Environmental Conditions Affect Botrytis cinerea Infection of Mature Grape Berries More Than the Strain or Transposon Genotype

Nicola Ciliberti; Marc Fermaud; Jean Roudet; et al.

12
claims
27
verbatim quotes
93
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Effects of environment, Botrytis cinerea strain, and their interaction on the infection of mature grape berries were investigated. The combined effect of temperature (T) of 15, 20, 25, and 30°C and relative humidity (RH) of 65, 80, 90, and 100% was studied by inoculating berries with mycelium plugs. Regardless of the T, no disease occurred at 65% RH, and both disease incidence and severity increased with increasing RH. The combined effect of T (5 to 30°C) and wetness duration (WD) of 3, 6, 12, 24, and 36 h was studied by inoculating berries with conidia. At WD of 36 h, disease incidence was approximately 75% of affected berries at 20 or 25°C, 50% at 15°C, and 30 to 20% at 30 and 10°C; no infection occurred at 5°C. Under favorable conditions (100% RH or 36 h of WD) and unfavorable conditions (65% RH or 3 h of WD), berry wounding did not significantly affect disease incidence; under moderately favorable conditions (80% RH or 6 to 12 h of WD), disease incidence was approximately 1.5 to 5 times higher in wounded than in intact berries. Our data collectively showed that (i) T and RH or WD were more important than strain for mature berry infection by either mycelium or conidia and (ii) the effect of the environment on the different strains was similar. Two equations were developed describing the combined effect of T and RH, or T and WD, on disease incidence following inoculation by mycelium (R2=0.99) or conidia (R2=0.96), respectively. These equations may be useful in the development of models used to predict and control Botrytis bunch rot during berry ripening.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 65% relative humidity no disease occurred regardless of temperature.

Taxon
grapet0
Interactor
Botrytis cinereaBotrytis cinereat0pathogen
Outcome
no disease occurrede0
Qualifier
65% RHe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Botrytis cinerea
Botrytis cinerea · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Regardless of the T, no disease occurred at 65% RH”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 301–351 · show in text ↑
t0

“Botrytis cinerea Infection of Mature Grape Berries”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–82 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Disease incidence and severity increased with relative humidity.

Taxon
grapet0
Interactor
Botrytis cinereaBotrytis cinereat0pathogen
Outcome
disease incidence and severitye0
Direction
increasede0
Setting
RHe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Botrytis cinerea
Botrytis cinerea · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“both disease incidence and severity increased with increasing RH”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 357–421 · show in text ↑
t0

“Botrytis cinerea Infection of Mature Grape Berries”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–82 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 36 h wetness, incidence was approximately 75% at 20 or 25°C.

Taxon
grapet0
Interactor
Botrytis cinereaBotrytis cinereat0pathogen
Outcome
disease incidencee0
Value
75%e0
Qualifier
WD of 36 he0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Botrytis cinerea
Botrytis cinerea · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At WD of 36 h, disease incidence was approximately 75% of affected berries at 20 or 25°C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 561–649 · show in text ↑
t0

“Botrytis cinerea Infection of Mature Grape Berries”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–82 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 36 h wetness, incidence was 50% at 15°C.

Taxon
grapet0
Interactor
Botrytis cinereaBotrytis cinereat0pathogen
Outcome
disease incidencee0
Value
50%e0
Qualifier
15°Ce0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Botrytis cinerea
Botrytis cinerea · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At WD of 36 h, disease incidence was approximately 75% of affected berries at 20 or 25°C, 50% at 15°C, and 30 to 20% at 30 and 10°C; no infection occurred at 5°C.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 561–723 · show in text ↑
t0

“Botrytis cinerea Infection of Mature Grape Berries”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–82 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 36 h wetness, incidence was 30 to 20% at 30 and 10°C.

Taxon
grapet0
Interactor
Botrytis cinereaBotrytis cinereat0pathogen
Outcome
disease incidencee0
Value
30 to 20%e0
Qualifier
30 and 10°Ce0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Botrytis cinerea
Botrytis cinerea · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At WD of 36 h, disease incidence was approximately 75% of affected berries at 20 or 25°C, 50% at 15°C, and 30 to 20% at 30 and 10°C; no infection occurred at 5°C.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 561–723 · show in text ↑
t0

“Botrytis cinerea Infection of Mature Grape Berries”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–82 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 36 h wetness, no infection occurred at 5°C.

Taxon
grapet0
Interactor
Botrytis cinereaBotrytis cinereat0pathogen
Outcome
no infection occurrede0
Qualifier
5°Ce0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Botrytis cinerea
Botrytis cinerea · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“no infection occurred at 5°C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 694–722 · show in text ↑
t0

“Botrytis cinerea Infection of Mature Grape Berries”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Berry wounding did not significantly affect disease incidence under favorable or unfavorable conditions.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
berry woundinge0
Interactor
Botrytis cinereaBotrytis cinereat0pathogen
Outcome
disease incidencee0
Direction
did not significantly affecte0
Qualifier
100% RH or 36 h of WDe2
Comparator
intact berriese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Botrytis cinerea
Botrytis cinerea · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“berry wounding did not significantly affect disease incidence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 825–886 · show in text ↑
e1

“intact berries”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1032–1046 · show in text ↑
e2

“100% RH or 36 h of WD”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 752–773 · show in text ↑
t0

“Botrytis cinerea Infection of Mature Grape Berries”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under moderately favorable conditions, incidence was 1.5 to 5 times higher in wounded than intact berries.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
woundede0
Interactor
Botrytis cinereaBotrytis cinereat0pathogen
Outcome
disease incidencee0
Direction
highere0
Value
1.5 to 5 timese0
Qualifier
80% RH or 6 to 12 h of WDe1
Comparator
intact berriese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Botrytis cinerea
Botrytis cinerea · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“disease incidence was approximately 1.5 to 5 times higher in wounded than in intact berries”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 955–1046 · show in text ↑
e1

“80% RH or 6 to 12 h of WD”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 927–952 · show in text ↑
t0

“Botrytis cinerea Infection of Mature Grape Berries”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–82 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Temperature and humidity or wetness duration mattered more than strain for mature berry infection.

Taxon
grapet0
Interactor
Botrytis cinereaBotrytis cinereat0pathogen
Outcome
mature berry infectione0
Direction
more importante0
Comparator
straine0
Setting
T and RH or WDe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Botrytis cinerea
Botrytis cinerea · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“T and RH or WD were more important than strain for mature berry infection by either mycelium or conidia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1086–1189 · show in text ↑
t0

“Botrytis cinerea Infection of Mature Grape Berries”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–82 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Environmental effects were similar across strains.

Taxon
grapet0
Interactor
Botrytis cinereaBotrytis cinereat0pathogen
Outcome
effect of the environment on the different strainse0
Direction
similare0
Setting
environmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Botrytis cinerea
Botrytis cinerea · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the effect of the environment on the different strains was similar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1199–1265 · show in text ↑
t0

“Botrytis cinerea Infection of Mature Grape Berries”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–82 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The temperature and humidity equation described disease incidence after mycelium inoculation with R2=0.99.

Taxon
grapet0
Interactor
Botrytis cinereaBotrytis cinereat0pathogen
Outcome
disease incidencee0
Value
R2=0.99e0
Qualifier
T and RHe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Botrytis cinerea
Botrytis cinerea · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Two equations were developed describing the combined effect of T and RH, or T and WD, on disease incidence following inoculation by mycelium (R2=0.99) or conidia (R2=0.96), respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1267–1452 · show in text ↑
t0

“Botrytis cinerea Infection of Mature Grape Berries”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–82 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The temperature and wetness duration equation described disease incidence after conidia inoculation with R2=0.96.

Taxon
grapet0
Interactor
Botrytis cinereaBotrytis cinereat0pathogen
Outcome
disease incidencee0
Value
R2=0.96e0
Qualifier
T and WDe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Botrytis cinerea
Botrytis cinerea · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Two equations were developed describing the combined effect of T and RH, or T and WD, on disease incidence following inoculation by mycelium (R2=0.99) or conidia (R2=0.96), respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1267–1452 · show in text ↑
t0

“Botrytis cinerea Infection of Mature Grape Berries”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–82 · show in text ↑

mechanical · Botrytis cinerea · VitisPositive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.