Paper · 2000 · Soil Science & Plant Nutrition

Effect of presowing seed treatments on germination and early seedling growth of wheat varieties under saline conditions

Maqsood Ahmed Kamboh; Yoko Oki; Adachi Tadashi

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
22
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Abstract The effect of presowing wheat seed treatments was investigated for the salt-sensitive variety Blue Silver and relatively salt-tolerant variety PARI-73 at the germination and early seedling stages. Seeds were treated with distilled water (DW) or 10/50 mm KCl, KNO3 , CaCl2, Ca(NO3)2 and then germinated in DW or 200 mm NaCl. Treatment with calcium (Ca) or potassium (K) did not lead to a significantly higher rate for final germination than the DW treatment. Ca salt treatments significantly improved shoot growth during the early seedling establishment stage in both varieties, especially in the salt-sensitive variety Blue Silver. There were significant differences in the Ca content of seeds after various presowing treatments. There were also significant differences between both varieties in the ion contents after seed treatment. However, these differences appeared to be related to the improvement of shoot growth during the early seedling establishment stage and not to the effectiveness of pres owing seed treatments in increasing germination.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Calcium or potassium presowing treatment did not significantly raise final germination over distilled water.

Treatment
calcium (Ca) or potassium (K)e0
Outcome
final germinatione0
Direction
did not lead to a significantly higher ratee0
Comparator
DW treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatment with calcium (Ca) or potassium (K) did not lead to a significantly higher rate for final germination than the DW treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 333–465 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Calcium salt treatments significantly improved early shoot growth in both varieties, especially Blue Silver.

Material
Blue Silvere0
Organ / stage
early seedling establishment stagee0
Treatment
Ca salt treatmentse0
Outcome
shoot growthe0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ca salt treatments significantly improved shoot growth during the early seedling establishment stage in both varieties, especially in the salt-sensitive variety Blue Silver”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 467–639 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–95 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmixedsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed calcium content differed significantly among presowing treatments.

Treatment
various presowing treatmentse0
Outcome
Ca content of seedse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There were significant differences in the Ca content of seeds after various presowing treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 641–737 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–95 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmixedsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The two varieties differed significantly in ion content after seed treatment.

Outcome
ion contentse0
Qualifier
after seed treatmente0
Comparator
both varietiese0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There were also significant differences between both varieties in the ion contents after seed treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 739–842 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–95 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ion-content differences appeared related to improved early shoot growth but not improved germination from presowing treatment.

Treatment
pres owing seed treatmentse0
Outcome
improvement of shoot growthe0
Direction
improvemente0
Qualifier
not to the effectiveness of pres owing seed treatments in increasing germinatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“these differences appeared to be related to the improvement of shoot growth during the early seedling establishment stage and not to the effectiveness of pres owing seed treatments in increasing germination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 853–1059 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–95 · show in text ↑

calcium atom · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

43 papers: 35 positive, 8 negative or no effect

34 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

39 papers more in this group

See all 43 papers →

potassium · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

79 papers: 66 positive, 13 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 66 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

75 papers more in this group

See all 79 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.