Paper · 2013 · American Journal of Plant Sciences

Fertilizer Placement Affects Weed Growth and Grain Yield in Dry-Seeded Rice (Oryza sativa L.) Systems

Bhagirath S. Chauhan; Seth B. Abugho

14
claims
29
verbatim quotes
16
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

A study was conducted in a split-plot design to evaluate the effect of fertilizer placement method on weed growth and grain yield in a dry-seeded rice (DSR) system. Main-plot treatments were four fertilizer placement methods: between narrow rows (between 15-cm-wide rows of the pattern 25-15-25 cm), between uniform rows (between 20-cm-wide rows), within uniform rows, and surface broadcast. Subplot treatments were three weed control methods: herbicide-treated, nontreated, and weed-free. Weed biomass was greater in the nontreated plots than in the herbicide-treated plots. Herbicide application reduced weed biomass by 89% to 99% compared with the nontreated control. Fertilizer placement did not influence weed biomass in the herbicide-treated plots; however, it greatly influenced biomass in the nontreated plots. Fertilizer placement on the surface increased weed biomass (69 -71 g·m–2) compared with the placement of fertilizer below the soil surface (37 -57 g·m–2). Fertilizer placement did not influence weed density and biomass at 60 days after planting. Nontreated plots yielded 700 to 2080 kg·ha–1. Grain yield was similar between the herbicide-treated (2660-3250 kg·ha–1) and weed-free (2620-3430 kg·ha–1) plots. Grain yield was not influenced when basal fertilizer was banded within (2390-2500 kg·ha–1) or between rows (2530-2650 kg·ha–1). However, grain yield decreased when basal fertilizer was broadcast on the soil surface (2200 kg·ha–1). The results of our study demonstrated that rice yield was usually lower with surface broadcast of fertilizer than with subsurface fertilizer treatments. In conclusion, surface broadcast of basal fertilizer may result in high weed pressure in DSR systems.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nontreated plots had greater weed biomass than herbicide-treated plots.

Treatment
nontreated plotse0
Interactor
Weede0weed
Outcome
Weed biomasse0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
herbicide-treated plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Weed biomass was greater in the nontreated plots than in the herbicide-treated plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 490–574 · show in text ↑
e1

“rice (DSR)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 146–156 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicide reduced weed biomass by 89% to 99%.

Treatment
Herbicide applicatione0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed biomasse0
Direction
reducede0
Value
89% to 99%e0
Comparator
nontreated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Herbicide application reduced weed biomass by 89% to 99% compared with the nontreated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 576–669 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer placement did not influence weed biomass in herbicide-treated plots.

Treatment
Fertilizer placemente0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed biomasse0
Direction
did not influencee0
Qualifier
herbicide-treated plotse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fertilizer placement did not influence weed biomass in the herbicide-treated plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 671–753 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer placement greatly influenced weed biomass in nontreated plots.

Treatment
Fertilizer placemente1
Interactor
weede1weed
Outcome
biomasse0
Qualifier
nontreated plotse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“it greatly influenced biomass in the nontreated plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 764–817 · show in text ↑
e1

“Fertilizer placement did not influence weed biomass in the herbicide-treated plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 671–753 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Surface fertilizer increased weed biomass versus below-surface placement.

Treatment
Fertilizer placement on the surfacee0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed biomasse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
69 -71 g·m–2e0
Qualifier
37 -57 g·m–2e0
Comparator
placement of fertilizer below the soil surfacee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fertilizer placement on the surface increased weed biomass (69 -71 g·m–2) compared with the placement of fertilizer below the soil surface (37 -57 g·m–2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 819–972 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer placement did not affect weed density at 60 days.

Treatment
Fertilizer placemente0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed densitye0
Direction
did not influencee0
Qualifier
60 days after plantinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fertilizer placement did not influence weed density and biomass at 60 days after planting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 974–1063 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer placement did not affect weed biomass at 60 days.

Treatment
Fertilizer placemente0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
biomasse0
Direction
did not influencee0
Qualifier
60 days after plantinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fertilizer placement did not influence weed density and biomass at 60 days after planting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 974–1063 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–75 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nontreated plots yielded 700 to 2080 kg per hectare.

Treatment
Nontreated plotse0
Outcome
yieldede0
Value
700 to 2080 kg·ha–1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nontreated plots yielded 700 to 2080 kg·ha–1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1065–1109 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield was similar between herbicide-treated and weed-free plots.

Treatment
herbicide-treatede0
Outcome
Grain yielde0
Direction
similare0
Value
2660-3250 kg·ha–1e0
Qualifier
2620-3430 kg·ha–1e0
Comparator
weed-freee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain yield was similar between the herbicide-treated (2660-3250 kg·ha–1) and weed-free (2620-3430 kg·ha–1) plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1111–1224 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Banded basal fertilizer within rows did not influence grain yield.

Treatment
basal fertilizer was banded withine0
Outcome
Grain yielde0
Direction
not influencede0
Value
2390-2500 kg·ha–1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain yield was not influenced when basal fertilizer was banded within (2390-2500 kg·ha–1) or between rows (2530-2650 kg·ha–1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1226–1352 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Banded basal fertilizer between rows did not influence grain yield.

Treatment
between rowse0
Outcome
Grain yielde0
Direction
not influencede0
Value
2530-2650 kg·ha–1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain yield was not influenced when basal fertilizer was banded within (2390-2500 kg·ha–1) or between rows (2530-2650 kg·ha–1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1226–1352 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Broadcast basal fertilizer decreased grain yield to 2200 kg per hectare.

Treatment
basal fertilizer was broadcast on the soil surfacee0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
2200 kg·ha–1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“grain yield decreased when basal fertilizer was broadcast on the soil surface (2200 kg·ha–1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1363–1455 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice yield was usually lower with surface broadcast than subsurface fertilizer.

Treatment
surface broadcast of fertilizere0
Outcome
rice yielde0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
subsurface fertilizer treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“rice yield was usually lower with surface broadcast of fertilizer than with subsurface fertilizer treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1500–1608 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that surface broadcast basal fertilizer may produce high weed pressure.

Treatment
surface broadcast of basal fertilizere0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
high weed pressuree0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“surface broadcast of basal fertilizer may result in high weed pressure in DSR systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1625–1710 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–75 · show in text ↑

fertilization · weed · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

68 papers: 53 positive, 15 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 53 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

64 papers more in this group

See all 68 papers →

herbicide · weed · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

603 papers: 579 positive, 24 negative or no effect

578 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

599 papers more in this group

See all 603 papers →

fertilization · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

759 papers: 670 positive, 89 negative or no effect

88 papers in the same direction as this paper · 670 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

755 papers more in this group

See all 759 papers →

herbicide · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

802 papers: 725 positive, 77 negative or no effect

76 papers in the same direction as this paper · 725 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

798 papers more in this group

See all 802 papers →

transplanting · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

1,078 papers: 922 positive, 156 negative or no effect

155 papers in the same direction as this paper · 922 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1,074 papers more in this group

See all 1,078 papers →

fertilization · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

3,455 papers: 3,183 positive, 272 negative or no effect

271 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3,183 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3,451 papers more in this group

See all 3,455 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.