Paper · 1988 · Agronomy Journal

Ethephon Influence on Harvestable Yield, Grain Quality, and Lodging of Corn

O. S. Norberg; S. C. Mason; S. R. Lowry

11
claims
25
verbatim quotes
79
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract To determine if ethephon ((2‐chloroethylphosphonic acid) would reduce lodging while maintaining or increasing harvestable yield, the influence of timing and rate of ethephon application on harvestable yield, yield components, lodging, and grain quality of corn ( Zea mays L.) was studied in 1985 and 1986. Ethephon was applied at rates of 0, 0.14, 0.28, and 0.56 kg ha −1 at tassel elongation (TE), 6 d after tassel elongation (TE+6), and at ear elongation (EE), to Pioneer hybrids P3475, P3377, and P3183 grown in the field near Mead, NE. Application of ethephon reduced lodging of corn plants. Ethephon application of 0.56 kg ha −1 at the EE stage reduced lodging of P3377 and P3183 from 30 to 9%. This rate resulted in production of 52 fewer kernels per ear, and 7 to 17 mg lighter kernel weight, while increasing the number of harvestable ears by 0.2 to 0.6 ears m −2 . Increasing the rate of ethephon resulted in a linear decrease in harvestable grain yield, except when applied at the EE stage in 1986, when ethephon application had no influence. In this case, increasing the rate of ethephon resulted in an increased number of harvestable ears per square meter, which compensated for reductions in the number of kernels per ear and kernel weight. Application of 0.56 kg ha −1 ethephon at TE in 1986, TE+6 in both years, and EE in 1985 resulted in approximately 1 Mg ha −1 reduction in harvestable grain yield. Ethephon application had small but significant influence on the protein content, kernel density, and kernel breakage susceptibility of grain produced. Application of ethephon is effective in reducing lodging of corn plants. However, ethephon never increased and usually reduced harvestable grain yields. Based on these results, there is little incentive for producers to consider application of ethephon to corn grown under conditions similar to those in this study.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethephon reduced lodging of corn.

Treatment
ethephone0
Outcome
lodginge0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of ethephon reduced lodging of corn plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 549–603 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At ear elongation, 0.56 kg ha −1 ethephon reduced lodging in P3377 and P3183 from 30 to 9%.

Material
P3377 and P3183e0
Treatment
0.56 kg ha −1e0
Outcome
lodginge0
Direction
reducede0
Value
30 to 9%e0
Qualifier
EE stagee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ethephon application of 0.56 kg ha −1 at the EE stage reduced lodging of P3377 and P3183 from 30 to 9%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 605–707 · show in text ↑
e1

“corn ( Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 265–284 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

This ethephon rate produced 52 fewer kernels per ear.

Treatment
0.56 kg ha −1e1
Outcome
kernels per eare0
Direction
fewere0
Value
52 fewer kernels per eare0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This rate resulted in production of 52 fewer kernels per ear”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 709–769 · show in text ↑
e1

“Ethephon application of 0.56 kg ha −1 at the EE stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 605–658 · show in text ↑
e2

“corn ( Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 265–284 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

This ethephon rate reduced kernel weight by 7 to 17 mg.

Treatment
0.56 kg ha −1e1
Outcome
kernel weighte0
Direction
lightere0
Value
7 to 17 mge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“7 to 17 mg lighter kernel weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 775–807 · show in text ↑
e1

“Ethephon application of 0.56 kg ha −1 at the EE stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 605–658 · show in text ↑
e2

“corn ( Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 265–284 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

This ethephon rate increased harvestable ears by 0.2 to 0.6 ears m −2.

Treatment
0.56 kg ha −1e1
Outcome
number of harvestable earse0
Direction
increasinge0
Value
0.2 to 0.6 ears m −2e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increasing the number of harvestable ears by 0.2 to 0.6 ears m −2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 815–880 · show in text ↑
e1

“Ethephon application of 0.56 kg ha −1 at the EE stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 605–658 · show in text ↑
e2

“corn ( Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 265–284 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing ethephon rate linearly decreased harvestable grain yield except at ear elongation in 1986.

Treatment
Increasing the rate of ethephone0
Outcome
harvestable grain yielde0
Direction
linear decreasee0
Qualifier
except when applied at the EE stage in 1986e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing the rate of ethephon resulted in a linear decrease in harvestable grain yield, except when applied at the EE stage in 1986, when ethephon application had no influence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 883–1060 · show in text ↑
e1

“corn ( Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 265–284 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At ear elongation in 1986, ethephon had no influence on grain yield.

Treatment
ethephon applicatione0
Outcome
harvestable grain yielde1
Direction
no influencee0
Qualifier
EE stage in 1986e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“when applied at the EE stage in 1986, when ethephon application had no influence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 980–1060 · show in text ↑
e1

“linear decrease in harvestable grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 929–971 · show in text ↑
e2

“corn ( Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 265–284 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At ear elongation in 1986, increasing ethephon rate increased harvestable ears per square meter.

Treatment
increasing the rate of ethephone0
Outcome
number of harvestable ears per square metere0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
EE stage in 1986e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increasing the rate of ethephon resulted in an increased number of harvestable ears per square meter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1076–1176 · show in text ↑
e1

“when applied at the EE stage in 1986”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 980–1016 · show in text ↑
e2

“corn ( Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 265–284 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Specified 0.56 kg ha −1 ethephon timings reduced harvestable grain yield by about 1 Mg ha −1.

Treatment
0.56 kg ha −1 ethephone0
Outcome
harvestable grain yielde0
Direction
reductione0
Value
approximately 1 Mg ha −1e0
Qualifier
TE in 1986, TE+6 in both years, and EE in 1985e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of 0.56 kg ha −1 ethephon at TE in 1986, TE+6 in both years, and EE in 1985 resulted in approximately 1 Mg ha −1 reduction in harvestable grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1263–1424 · show in text ↑
e1

“corn ( Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 265–284 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethephon significantly affected grain protein content, kernel density, and breakage susceptibility, with small effects.

Treatment
Ethephon applicatione0
Outcome
protein content, kernel density, and kernel breakage susceptibilitye0
Qualifier
smalle0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ethephon application had small but significant influence on the protein content, kernel density, and kernel breakage susceptibility of grain produced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1426–1575 · show in text ↑
e1

“corn ( Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 265–284 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors found little incentive to apply ethephon to corn under similar conditions.

Outcome
little incentive for producers to consider application of ethephone0
Qualifier
conditions similar to those in this studye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there is little incentive for producers to consider application of ethephon to corn grown under conditions similar to those in this study”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1754–1891 · show in text ↑

(2-chloroethyl)phosphonic acid · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

28 papers: 15 positive, 13 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

(2-chloroethyl)phosphonic acid · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

25 papers: 21 positive, 4 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.