Abstract
The fruit quality parameters of Prunus armeniaca L. cv 'Ninfa' grafted on 'Myrobalan 29C' (Prunus cerasifera Ehrh.) and 'Real Fino' apricot seedling (Prunus armeniaca L.) were analysed in an experimental orchard under organic management. The study was performed between 2010 and 2012 in the province of Seville (SW Spain). Colour, fruit and stone weights, firmness, soluble solid concentration, and acidity were measured for fruit quality evaluation. Trunk cross-sectional area, main branches, and fruit yield were also determined. In general, 'Myrobalan 29C' rootstock produced fruit slightly larger in size and with a bigger weight. By contrast, apricots on 'Myrobalan 29C' had less firmness and a lower solid soluble concentration than on 'Real Fino'. There was little difference in the colour, acidity, and stone dry weights. Trees on 'Real Fino' had larger areas of trunk and branches but no significant differences were obtained in relation to fruit yields.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
Myrobalan 29C produced slightly larger and heavier apricot fruit than Real Fino.
- Taxon
- apricot
Prunus armeniacat0 - Treatment
- 'Myrobalan 29C' rootstocke0
- Outcome
- fruite0
- Direction
- slightly largere0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“'Myrobalan 29C' rootstock produced fruit slightly larger in size and with a bigger weight”
t0“apricot”
Claim · model-written summary
Apricots on Myrobalan 29C were less firm than on Real Fino.
- Taxon
- apricot
Prunus armeniacat0 - Treatment
- 'Myrobalan 29C'e0
- Outcome
- firmnesse0
- Direction
- lesse0
- Comparator
- 'Real Fino'e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“apricots on 'Myrobalan 29C' had less firmness and a lower solid soluble concentration than on 'Real Fino'”
t0“apricot”
Claim · model-written summary
Apricots on Myrobalan 29C had lower soluble solid concentration than on Real Fino.
- Taxon
- apricot
Prunus armeniacat0 - Treatment
- 'Myrobalan 29C'e0
- Outcome
- solid soluble concentratione0
- Direction
- lowere0
- Comparator
- 'Real Fino'e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“apricots on 'Myrobalan 29C' had less firmness and a lower solid soluble concentration than on 'Real Fino'”
t0“apricot”
Claim · model-written summary
Fruit colour, acidity and stone dry weight differed little between rootstocks.
- Taxon
- apricot
Prunus armeniacat0 - Outcome
- colour, acidity, and stone dry weightse0
- Direction
- little differencee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“There was little difference in the colour, acidity, and stone dry weights”
t0“apricot”
Claim · model-written summary
Trees on Real Fino had larger trunk and branch areas.
- Taxon
- apricot
Prunus armeniacat0 - Treatment
- 'Real Fino'e0
- Outcome
- areas of trunk and branchese0
- Direction
- largere0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Trees on 'Real Fino' had larger areas of trunk and branches”
t0“apricot”
Claim · model-written summary
Fruit yield did not significantly differ between rootstocks.
- Taxon
- apricot
Prunus armeniacat0 - Outcome
- fruit yieldse0
- Direction
- no significant differencese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“no significant differences were obtained in relation to fruit yields”
t0“apricot”
The same questions in other papers
Terminalia catappa · quality: postharvest · Prunus armeniaca (apricot)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- no effect
Terminalia catappa · yield · Prunus armeniaca (apricot)Results agree
5 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →grafting · yield · Prunus armeniaca (apricot)Positive and negative results
7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- positive
- no effect
- positive
5 papers more in this group
See all 9 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.