Paper · 1964 · Soil Science Society of America Journal

Factors Influencing the Availability of Sulfur Fertilizers to Alfalfa and Corn

R. L. Fox; H. M. Atesalp; D. H. Kampbell; et al.

9
claims
14
verbatim quotes
59
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Field and greenhouse experiments indicated that 8‐mesh elemental S was frequently inferior to sulfate forms of S for alfalfa and corn production on S deficient, acid, sandy soils in Nebraska. There was a marked increase in utilization of S from the elemental form during the second year compared with the first year after application. Sulfur flour mixed with the soil was as effective as gypsum either mixed with the soil or side‐banded at planting time for supplying S to young corn plants in the greenhouse. A sidebanded application of the S at planting time was much less effective than the same material mixed with the soil unless a small amount of CaCO 3 was also applied in the band. Sulfur utilization by young corn plants was linearly related to approximate specific surface of S particles obtained from 8‐mesh material. The smallest particles, < 0.05 mm. in diameter, were slightly less effective than either S flour or gypsum applied at the same rate. The largest particles, 2.0 to 1.0 mm. in diameter, were relatively ineffective even at high rates of application. Superiority of S flour over 8‐mesh material, at least under some conditions, appears to be associated largely with relative sizes of particles in the two materials.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elemental S was frequently inferior to sulfate for alfalfa production.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae0
Treatment
8‐mesh elemental Se0
Outcome
alfalfa and corn productione0
Direction
inferiore0
Comparator
sulfate forms of Se0
Setting
Nebraskae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“8‐mesh elemental S was frequently inferior to sulfate forms of S for alfalfa and corn production on S deficient, acid, sandy soils in Nebraska”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 57–199 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elemental S was frequently inferior to sulfate for corn production.

Treatment
8‐mesh elemental Se0
Outcome
alfalfa and corn productione0
Direction
inferiore0
Comparator
sulfate forms of Se0
Setting
Nebraskae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“8‐mesh elemental S was frequently inferior to sulfate forms of S for alfalfa and corn production on S deficient, acid, sandy soils in Nebraska”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 57–199 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Utilization of elemental S increased markedly in the second year.

Outcome
utilization of Se0
Direction
marked increasee0
Qualifier
the second yeare0
Comparator
the first yeare0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗
Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was a marked increase in utilization of S from the elemental form during the second year compared with the first year after application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 201–342 · show in text ↑
t0

“Alfalfa and Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil-mixed sulfur flour supplied S to young corn as effectively as gypsum.

Treatment
Sulfur flour mixed with the soile0
Outcome
supplying S to young corn plantse0
Direction
as effectivee0
Comparator
gypsume0
Setting
greenhousee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sulfur flour mixed with the soil was as effective as gypsum either mixed with the soil or side‐banded at planting time for supplying S to young corn plants in the greenhouse”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 344–517 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sidebanded S was less effective than mixed S without CaCO 3.

Treatment
sidebanded application of the S at planting timee0
Outcome
less effectivee0
Direction
less effectivee0
Qualifier
unless a small amount of CaCO 3 was also applied in the bande0
Comparator
the same material mixed with the soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A sidebanded application of the S at planting time was much less effective than the same material mixed with the soil unless a small amount of CaCO 3 was also applied in the band”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 519–697 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–78 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfur utilization in young corn was linearly related to particle specific surface.

Treatment
S particles obtained from 8‐mesh materiale0
Outcome
Sulfur utilizatione0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sulfur utilization by young corn plants was linearly related to approximate specific surface of S particles obtained from 8‐mesh material”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 699–836 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The smallest S particles were slightly less effective than flour or gypsum.

Treatment
The smallest particles, < 0.05 mm. in diametere0
Outcome
less effectivee0
Direction
less effectivee0
Comparator
S flour or gypsume0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The smallest particles, < 0.05 mm. in diameter, were slightly less effective than either S flour or gypsum applied at the same rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 838–969 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–78 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The largest S particles were relatively ineffective even at high application rates.

Treatment
The largest particles, 2.0 to 1.0 mm. in diametere0
Outcome
relatively ineffectivee0
Direction
relatively ineffectivee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The largest particles, 2.0 to 1.0 mm. in diameter, were relatively ineffective even at high rates of application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 971–1083 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–78 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

S flour superiority over 8-mesh material was largely associated with particle size.

Outcome
Superiority of S floure0
Qualifier
relative sizes of particlese0
Comparator
8‐mesh materiale0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Superiority of S flour over 8‐mesh material, at least under some conditions, appears to be associated largely with relative sizes of particles in the two materials”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1085–1248 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–78 · show in text ↑

sulfur atom · organism · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 3 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.