Paper · 1996 · Crop Science

Contribution of Leaf Expansion, Rate of Leaf Appearance, and Stolon Branching to Growth of Plant Leaf Area under Water Deficit in White Clover

Christine Belaygue; Jacques Wery; Alexander Cowan; et al.

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
61
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Response of white clover ( Trifolium repens L.) leaf area to water deficit depends on three processes: individual leaf expansion, phytomer production, and stolon branching. We have evaluated these processes in five clones under a wide range of conditions. Four experiments of 60 to 120 d duration were conducted: two in a growth chamber, one in a greenhouse, and one outdoors. Water supply was managed in such a way that predawn leaf water potential and day‐time leaf relative water content (RWC) were maintained at constant values during deficit periods of 20 to 68 d. This was achieved by growing plants either in soil columns with irrigation controlled by tensiometers, or in vermiculite, on top of foam columns with a controlled level of water inside the foam. Leaf appearance rate (LAR) and leaf initiation rate remained constant with time at a given RWC, but decreased with decreases in RWC. A reduction in individual leaf area (LA) was observed in all leaves which experienced water deficit during part of the expansion period. Stolon branching decreased considerably with relatively mild deficits. Similar relationships between relative reductions in RWC (compared with control plants), and relative reductions in LA, LAR and stolon number were observed in all experiments. Short deficits (1–2 wk) caused a 20 to 30% reduction in stolon number and individual LA but no change in leaf number per stolon. Longer deficits with mild, intermediate, or severe intensities caused major reductions in stolon number, individual leaf area, and number of leaves per stolon, respectively, with respect to the reduction in plant leaf area. In addition to individual leaf area, phytomer production and stolon branching make major contributions to drought‐induced reductions in leaf area depending upon the type of water deficit.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf appearance and initiation rates stayed constant over time at a given relative water content but fell as relative water content decreased.

Taxon
white cloverTrifolium repenst0
Organ / stage
leafe0
Outcome
Leaf appearance rate (LAR) and leaf initiation ratee0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
at a given RWCe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leaf appearance rate (LAR) and leaf initiation rate remained constant with time at a given RWC, but decreased with decreases in RWC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 765–896 · show in text ↑
t0

“White Clover”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 130–142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaves exposed to water deficit during expansion had reduced individual leaf area.

Taxon
white cloverTrifolium repenst0
Organ / stage
leavese0
Treatment
water deficite0
Outcome
individual leaf area (LA)e0
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A reduction in individual leaf area (LA) was observed in all leaves which experienced water deficit during part of the expansion period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 898–1033 · show in text ↑
t0

“White Clover”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 130–142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stolon branching decreased under relatively mild water deficits.

Taxon
white cloverTrifolium repenst0
Treatment
relatively mild deficitse0
Outcome
Stolon branchinge0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Stolon branching decreased considerably with relatively mild deficits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1035–1104 · show in text ↑
t0

“White Clover”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 130–142 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Relative reductions in water content related similarly to reductions in leaf area, leaf appearance, and stolon number across experiments.

Taxon
white cloverTrifolium repenst0
Outcome
relative reductions in LA, LAR and stolon numbere0
Direction
reductionse0
Comparator
control plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Similar relationships between relative reductions in RWC (compared with control plants), and relative reductions in LA, LAR and stolon number were observed in all experiments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1106–1280 · show in text ↑
t0

“White Clover”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 130–142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Short deficits reduced stolon number and individual leaf area by 20 to 30%.

Taxon
white cloverTrifolium repenst0
Treatment
Short deficits (1–2 wk)e0
Outcome
stolon number and individual LAe0
Direction
reductione0
Value
20 to 30%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Short deficits (1–2 wk) caused a 20 to 30% reduction in stolon number and individual LA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1282–1369 · show in text ↑
t0

“White Clover”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 130–142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Short deficits did not change leaf number per stolon.

Taxon
white cloverTrifolium repenst0
Treatment
Short deficits (1–2 wk)e0
Outcome
leaf number per stolone0
Direction
no changee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Short deficits (1–2 wk) caused a 20 to 30% reduction in stolon number and individual LA but no change in leaf number per stolon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1282–1409 · show in text ↑
t0

“White Clover”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 130–142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Long mild deficits primarily reduced stolon number.

Taxon
white cloverTrifolium repenst0
Treatment
Longer deficits with milde0
Outcome
stolon numbere0
Direction
reductionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Longer deficits with mild, intermediate, or severe intensities caused major reductions in stolon number, individual leaf area, and number of leaves per stolon, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1411–1583 · show in text ↑
t0

“White Clover”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 130–142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Long intermediate deficits primarily reduced individual leaf area.

Taxon
white cloverTrifolium repenst0
Treatment
intermediatee0
Outcome
individual leaf areae0
Direction
reductionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Longer deficits with mild, intermediate, or severe intensities caused major reductions in stolon number, individual leaf area, and number of leaves per stolon, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1411–1583 · show in text ↑
t0

“White Clover”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 130–142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Long severe deficits primarily reduced leaf number per stolon.

Taxon
white cloverTrifolium repenst0
Treatment
severe intensitiese0
Outcome
number of leaves per stolone0
Direction
reductionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Longer deficits with mild, intermediate, or severe intensities caused major reductions in stolon number, individual leaf area, and number of leaves per stolon, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1411–1583 · show in text ↑
t0

“White Clover”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 130–142 · show in text ↑

drought · growth · Trifolium repens (white clover)Results differ

28 papers: 7 positive, 21 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.