Paper · 1987 · Botanical Gazette

Effects of End-of-Day Red/Far-Red Ratio on Growth and Orientation of Sunflower Leaves

Jorge J. Casal; Victor O. Sadras

8
claims
17
verbatim quotes
10
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Sunflowers, Helianthus annuus `Contiflor' and `P75,' were grown in pots under natural daylight in glass-house and field experiments to examine the responses of extension growth and orientation of leaves to end-of-day irradiations with different red/far-red (R/FR) ratios. For individual leaves the effect on expansion was biphasic. High R/FR ratios enhanced growth in young leaves but inhibited growth as leaves became older. No differences were found for growth duration or phyllochron index. The pattern of response was similar in both cultivars. The upper leaves tracked the sun, but, in `Contiflor' at low solar elevations, solar tracking was more nearly accurate for leaves of high R/FR-irradiated plants. Conversely, the laminar angle of `P75' was unaffected by the light treatments. A similar pattern of laminar angle response occurred for plants of different ages.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High red/far-red ratios enhanced growth in young sunflower leaves.

Taxon
SunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Organ / stage
young leavese0
Treatment
High R/FR ratiose0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“High R/FR ratios enhanced growth in young leaves but inhibited growth as leaves became older.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 332–425 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sunflower Leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High red/far-red ratios inhibited growth in older sunflower leaves.

Taxon
SunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Organ / stage
leaves became oldere0
Treatment
High R/FR ratiose0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
inhibitede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“High R/FR ratios enhanced growth in young leaves but inhibited growth as leaves became older.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 332–425 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sunflower Leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Growth duration and phyllochron index did not differ among light treatments.

Taxon
SunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Treatment
end-of-day irradiations with different red/far-red (R/FR) ratiose1
Outcome
growth duration or phyllochron indexe0
Direction
No differencese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No differences were found for growth duration or phyllochron index.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 426–493 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sunflower Leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–85 · show in text ↑
e1

“end-of-day irradiations with different red/far-red (R/FR) ratios”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 206–270 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf expansion responses were similar in both cultivars.

Taxon
SunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Material
both cultivarse0
Outcome
pattern of responsee0
Direction
similare0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The pattern of response was similar in both cultivars.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 494–548 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sunflower Leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–85 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Upper sunflower leaves tracked the sun.

Taxon
SunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Organ / stage
upper leavese0
Outcome
tracked the sune0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The upper leaves tracked the sun, but, in `Contiflor' at low solar elevations, solar tracking was more nearly accurate for leaves of high R/FR-irradiated plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 549–710 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sunflower Leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At low solar elevations, high R/FR made Contiflor solar tracking more accurate.

Taxon
SunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Material
`Contiflor'e0
Treatment
high R/FR-irradiatede0
Outcome
solar trackinge0
Direction
more nearly accuratee0
Qualifier
low solar elevationse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in `Contiflor' at low solar elevations, solar tracking was more nearly accurate for leaves of high R/FR-irradiated plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 588–710 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sunflower Leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P75 laminar angle was unaffected by light treatments.

Taxon
SunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Material
`P75'e0
Treatment
light treatmentse0
Outcome
laminar anglee0
Direction
unaffectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the laminar angle of `P75' was unaffected by the light treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 723–789 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sunflower Leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–85 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Laminar angle responses were similar across plant ages.

Taxon
SunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Organ / stage
plants of different agese0
Outcome
laminar angle responsee0
Direction
similare0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A similar pattern of laminar angle response occurred for plants of different ages.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 790–872 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sunflower Leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–85 · show in text ↑

radiation · growth · Helianthus annuus (common sunflower)Positive and negative results

19 papers: 8 positive, 11 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.