Paper · 1983 · Photochemistry and Photobiology

INFLUENCE OF PHOTON FLUX DENSITY IN THE 400–700 nm WAVEBAND ON INHIBITION OF PHOTOSYNTHESIS BY UV‐B (280–320 nm) IRRADIATION IN SOYBEAN LEAVES: SEPARATION OF INDIRECT AND IMMEDIATE EFFECTS

Charles W. Warner; Martyn M. Caldwell

6
claims
18
verbatim quotes
135
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract— Visible radiation can substantially influence the degree to which plant photosynthesis is inhibited by UV‐B radiation. This study was designed to separate the immediate effects of visible radiation on UV‐B photosynthetic inhibition from the indirect influence of visible irradiation on morphological and physiological properties of leaves during leaf development. Soybean plants were pretreated in growth chambers with either high or low visible irradiance (750 and 70 μmol m ‐2 s ‐1 quantum flux in the 400–700 nm waveband, respectively) during the development of leaves used subsequently for UV irradiation. Test leaves still attached to the plant were exposed to 5 h of polychromatic UV‐B irradiation and the photosynthetic capacity (net CO 2 exchange) was determined before and after the UV irradiation. During the UV irradiation, plants from both pretreatment groups received either high or low visible flux. Development of leaves in the high visible flux pretreatment conditions resulted in thicker leaves, higher chlorophyll a/b ratios, more UV‐absorbing pigments, and reduced sensitivity to the UV‐B irradiation. However, higher visible flux during the UV‐B irradiation resulted in greater depression of photosynthesis by the UV‐B irradiation. The relative magnitude of photosynthetic depression under these treatment combinations was the same when photosynthesis was measured under either light‐limited or light‐saturated conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High visible light during development produced thicker leaves.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
high visible flux pretreatment conditionse0
Outcome
thicker leavese0
Direction
thickere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Development of leaves in the high visible flux pretreatment conditions resulted in thicker leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 924–1021 · show in text ↑
t0

“SOYBEAN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–135 · show in text ↑
e1

“Soybean plants were pretreated in growth chambers with either high or low visible irradiance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 374–466 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High visible light during development produced higher chlorophyll a/b ratios.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
high visible flux pretreatment conditionse1
Outcome
chlorophyll a/b ratiose0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“higher chlorophyll a/b ratios”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1023–1052 · show in text ↑
t0

“SOYBEAN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–135 · show in text ↑
e1

“Development of leaves in the high visible flux pretreatment conditions resulted in thicker leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 924–1021 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High visible light during development produced more UV-absorbing pigments.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
high visible flux pretreatment conditionse1
Outcome
UV‐absorbing pigmentse0
Direction
moree0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“more UV‐absorbing pigments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1054–1080 · show in text ↑
t0

“SOYBEAN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–135 · show in text ↑
e1

“Development of leaves in the high visible flux pretreatment conditions resulted in thicker leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 924–1021 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High visible light during development reduced UV-B sensitivity.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
high visible flux pretreatment conditionse1
Outcome
sensitivity to the UV‐B irradiatione0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“reduced sensitivity to the UV‐B irradiation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1086–1129 · show in text ↑
t0

“SOYBEAN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–135 · show in text ↑
e1

“Development of leaves in the high visible flux pretreatment conditions resulted in thicker leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 924–1021 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher visible light during UV-B exposure increased photosynthetic depression.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
higher visible flux during the UV‐B irradiatione0
Outcome
depression of photosynthesise0
Direction
greatere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“higher visible flux during the UV‐B irradiation resulted in greater depression of photosynthesis by the UV‐B irradiation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1140–1260 · show in text ↑
t0

“SOYBEAN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–135 · show in text ↑
e1

“Soybean plants were pretreated in growth chambers with either high or low visible irradiance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 374–466 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The treatment ranking was the same under light-limited and saturated measurement.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Outcome
relative magnitude of photosynthetic depressione0
Direction
samee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The relative magnitude of photosynthetic depression under these treatment combinations was the same when photosynthesis was measured under either light‐limited or light‐saturated conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1262–1451 · show in text ↑
t0

“SOYBEAN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–135 · show in text ↑
e1

“Soybean plants were pretreated in growth chambers with either high or low visible irradiance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 374–466 · show in text ↑

uv · physiology: photosynthesis · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

28 papers: 6 positive, 22 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.