Paper · 2012 · Pest Management Science

Dimethyl disulfide is an induced systemic resistance elicitor produced by Bacillus cereus C1L

Chien‐Jui Huang; Jia‐Fang Tsay; Shu‐Yu Chang; et al.

5
claims
9
verbatim quotes
166
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Bacillus cereus C1L is a plant growth-promoting rhizobacterium and can elicit induced systemic resistance (ISR) in plants against necrotrophic pathogens. However, little is known about ISR elicitors produced by B. cereus C1L, and no ISR elicitor has been identified and characterised. Therefore, the objective of this study is to identify volatile ISR elicitor(s) produced by B. cereus C1L. RESULTS: The volatile metabolites produced by B. cereus C1L were extracted, separated and identified by solid-phase microextraction, gas chromatography and mass spectrometry. Dimethyl disulfide (DMDS) was the only separated metabolite being determined. Afterwards, application of DMDS by means of soil drench significantly protected tobacco and corn plants against Botrytis cinerea and Cochliobolus heterostrophus, respectively, under greenhouse conditions. The results reveal that DMDS could play an important role in ISR by B. cereus C1L. CONCLUSION: This is the first report of DMDS as an elicitor produced by an ISR-eliciting B. cereus strain and its ability to suppress plant fungal diseases under greenhouse conditions. It is suggested that DMDS has potential for practical use in controlling plant foliar diseases besides soil fumigation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dimethyl disulfide was the sole separated volatile metabolite identified from Bacillus cereus C1L.

Taxon
tobacco and corn plantsNicotiana tabacumZea mays subsp. mayse2
Interactor
B. cereus C1LBacillus cereuse1symbiont
Outcome
Dimethyl disulfide (DMDS) was the only separated metabolitee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus cereus
Bacillus cereus · InteractorMogana Das Murtey and Patchamuthu Ramasamy · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Dimethyl disulfide (DMDS) was the only separated metabolite being determined.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 578–655 · show in text ↑
e1

“volatile metabolites produced by B. cereus C1L”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 416–462 · show in text ↑
e2

“tobacco and corn plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 736–759 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil drench DMDS significantly protected tobacco against Botrytis cinerea in a greenhouse.

Treatment
application of DMDS by means of soil drenche0
Interactor
Botrytis cinereaBotrytis cinereae0pathogen
Outcome
protected tobacco and corn plants against Botrytis cinerea and Cochliobolus heterostrophuse0
Direction
protectede0
Setting
greenhouse conditionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Botrytis cinerea
Botrytis cinerea · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of DMDS by means of soil drench significantly protected tobacco and corn plants against Botrytis cinerea and Cochliobolus heterostrophus, respectively, under greenhouse conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 668–860 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil drench DMDS significantly protected corn against Cochliobolus heterostrophus in a greenhouse.

Treatment
application of DMDS by means of soil drenche0
Interactor
Cochliobolus heterostrophusBipolaris maydise0pathogen
Outcome
protected tobacco and corn plants against Botrytis cinerea and Cochliobolus heterostrophuse0
Direction
protectede0
Setting
greenhouse conditionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bipolaris maydis
Bipolaris maydis · InteractorDavid B. Langston · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of DMDS by means of soil drench significantly protected tobacco and corn plants against Botrytis cinerea and Cochliobolus heterostrophus, respectively, under greenhouse conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 668–860 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors infer that DMDS may contribute to induced systemic resistance elicited by B. cereus C1L.

Taxon
tobacco and corn plantsNicotiana tabacumZea mays subsp. mayse1
Interactor
B. cereus C1LBacillus cereuse0symbiont
Compound
DMDSe0
Outcome
ISRe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus cereus
Bacillus cereus · InteractorMogana Das Murtey and Patchamuthu Ramasamy · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“DMDS could play an important role in ISR by B. cereus C1L”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 885–942 · show in text ↑
e1

“tobacco and corn plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 736–759 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest DMDS for practical control of plant foliar diseases.

Taxon
tobacco and corn plantsNicotiana tabacumZea mays subsp. mayse1
Compound
DMDSe0
Outcome
practical use in controlling plant foliar diseasese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“DMDS has potential for practical use in controlling plant foliar diseases besides soil fumigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1150–1247 · show in text ↑
e1

“tobacco and corn plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 736–759 · show in text ↑

dimethyl disulfide · Botrytis cinerea · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

dimethyl disulfide · Bipolaris maydis · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

application · Botrytis cinerea · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

application · Bipolaris maydis · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.