Paper · 2012 · New Phytologist

The contribution of foliar endophytes to quantitative resistance to Melampsora rust

Anil K. H. Raghavendra; George Newcombe

5
claims
13
verbatim quotes
87
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Foliar endophytes of Populus do not induce the hypersensitive response associated with major genes for resistance to Melampsora leaf rust. But they could contribute to the quantitative resistance that represents a second line of defense. Quantitative resistance is thought to be determined by suites of minor genes in both host and pathogen that are influenced by the abiotic environment. Here, we determined the relative importance to quantitative resistance of foliar endophytes, one element of the biotic environment. Leaves of six host genotypes differing in genetic resistance to Melampsora × columbiana were inoculated first with one of four foliar endophytes (Stachybotrys sp., Trichoderma atroviride, Ulocladium atrum or Truncatella angustata), and then with Melampsora. These endophytes greatly reduced rust severity within inoculated leaves (i.e. local effects), but they had no systemic effect on rust of leaves not inoculated with endophytes. Differences among endophytes and their controls explained 54% of the total variation in quantitative resistance (i.e. rust severity); the six host/pathogen genotypes explained just 5%. In terms of magnitude of effect on rust severity, Stachybotrys, Trichoderma, Ulocladium and Truncatella were ranked in this order on all host/pathogen genotypes. Endophytes may contribute significantly to quantitative resistance to Melampsora in leaves of Populus.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar endophytes greatly reduced Melampsora rust severity within inoculated leaves of Populus.

Taxon
PopulusPopuluse0
Treatment
endophytese1
Interactor
Melampsora × columbianae2pathogen
Second interactor
foliar endophytese3biocontrol_agent
Outcome
rust severitye1
Direction
reducede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar endophytes of Populus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–28 · show in text ↑
e1

“These endophytes greatly reduced rust severity within inoculated leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 779–850 · show in text ↑
e2

“genetic resistance to Melampsora × columbiana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 563–608 · show in text ↑
e3

“inoculated first with one of four foliar endophytes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 614–665 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar endophytes had no systemic effect on rust severity in leaves not inoculated with endophytes.

Taxon
PopulusPopuluse0
Treatment
endophytese1
Outcome
systemic effect on ruste1
Direction
no_changeinferrede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar endophytes of Populus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–28 · show in text ↑
e1

“they had no systemic effect on rust of leaves not inoculated with endophytes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 877–953 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Differences among endophytes and their controls explained 54% of the total variation in quantitative resistance.

Taxon
PopulusPopuluse0
Treatment
endophytese4
Outcome
total variation in quantitative resistancee4
Value
54%e4
Comparator
controlse4

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar endophytes of Populus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–28 · show in text ↑
e4

“Differences among endophytes and their controls explained 54% of the total variation in quantitative resistance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 955–1066 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The six host/pathogen genotypes explained just 5% of the total variation in quantitative resistance.

Taxon
PopulusPopuluse0
Material
six host/pathogen genotypese5
Outcome
total variation in quantitative resistancee6
Value
5%e5

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar endophytes of Populus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–28 · show in text ↑
e5

“the six host/pathogen genotypes explained just 5%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1089–1138 · show in text ↑
e6

“total variation in quantitative resistance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1024–1066 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stachybotrys, Trichoderma, Ulocladium and Truncatella were ranked in this order by magnitude of effect on rust severity on all host/pathogen genotypes.

Taxon
PopulusPopuluse0
Interactor
StachybotrysStachybotryse7biocontrol_agent
Second interactor
TrichodermaTrichodermae7biocontrol_agent
Outcome
magnitude of effect on rust severitye7
Direction
ranked in this ordere7
Qualifier
Ulocladium and Truncatellae7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Stachybotrys
Stachybotrys · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Dr. Sahay · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trichoderma
Trichoderma · Second interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Systematic Botany and Mycology Laboratory, [1] · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar endophytes of Populus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–28 · show in text ↑
e7

“In terms of magnitude of effect on rust severity, Stachybotrys, Trichoderma, Ulocladium and Truncatella were ranked in this order on all host/pathogen genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1140–1300 · show in text ↑

inoculation · disease · Populus (poplar)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 4 positive, 5 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.