Paper · 2006 · The Journal of Agricultural Science

The influence of 3,4-dimethylpyrazole phosphate and dicyandiamide on reducing nitrate accumulation in spinach under Mediterranean conditions

IGNACIO IRIGOYEN; CARMEN LAMSFUS; PEDRO APARICIO-TEJO; et al.

9
claims
17
verbatim quotes
19
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The European Union has limited the maximum nitrate (NO 3 − ) content allowed for industrial processed spinach ( Spinacia oleracea L.) to 2000 mg/kg fresh weight in order to avoid human pathologies associated with uptake of high amounts of nitrate. Nitrification inhibitors (NIs) 3,4-dimethylpyrazole phosphate (DMPP) and dicyandiamide (DCD) allow changing of the molecular form (NH 4 + or NO 3 − ) in which soil mineral N is available for plants. Enhancing ammonium nutrition has successfully reduced the amount of nitrate accumulated in plants in hydroponic culture. Therefore, fertilizers containing NIs have been proposed to reduce nitrate accumulated by vegetables grown in field conditions. Basammon Stabil® (BS) and Entec 26®-(E26) are commercial fertilizers containing DCD and DMPP respectively. In the present paper, the effect of applying ammonium sulphate nitrate (ASN), BS and E26 at three rates (0, 150 and 250 kg N/ha) to spinach crops cultivated under Mediterranean growing conditions for industrial processing is analysed. During 1998 and 1999, eight field split-plot trials with four replicates were carried out in the Ebro Valley, northern Spain, during different seasons and with various soil types. The fertilizer effects were influenced by the season and the type of soil. In spring, fertilizers containing NIs increased the mineral N (Nmin) in the soil and greatly reduced nitrate accumulation in the crop. In autumn, with less solar radiation, the nitrate accumulation was more than 2000 mg/kg fresh weight on many occasions and the effect of NIs was smaller. The present paper concluded that, under Mediterranean growing conditions, DCD can reduce nitrate accumulation in spinach between 18 and 61% and DMPP between 33 and 84%, without reducing yield or changing other quality characteristics. NIs are especially useful in the spring, when soil temperature is low and solar radiation interception by the crop is high.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer effects on spinach varied by season and soil type.

Outcome
fertilizer effectse0
Qualifier
season and the type of soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The fertilizer effects were influenced by the season and the type of soil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1218–1292 · show in text ↑
t0

“spinach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–109 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In spring, nitrification inhibitor fertilizers increased soil mineral nitrogen.

Treatment
fertilizers containing NIse0
Outcome
mineral N (Nmin) in the soile0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
In springe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In spring, fertilizers containing NIs increased the mineral N (Nmin) in the soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1293–1373 · show in text ↑
t0

“spinach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–109 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In spring, nitrification inhibitor fertilizers greatly reduced crop nitrate accumulation.

Treatment
fertilizers containing NIse0
Outcome
nitrate accumulation in the crope0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
In springe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In spring, fertilizers containing NIs increased the mineral N (Nmin) in the soil and greatly reduced nitrate accumulation in the crop.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1293–1427 · show in text ↑
t0

“spinach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–109 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In autumn, nitrate accumulation exceeded 2000 mg/kg fresh weight on many occasions.

Outcome
nitrate accumulatione0
Direction
more thane0
Value
2000 mg/kg fresh weighte0
Qualifier
In autumn, with less solar radiatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In autumn, with less solar radiation, the nitrate accumulation was more than 2000 mg/kg fresh weight on many occasions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1428–1546 · show in text ↑
t0

“spinach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–109 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrification inhibitor effects were smaller in autumn.

Outcome
effect of NIse0
Direction
smallere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the effect of NIs was smaller”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1551–1580 · show in text ↑
t0

“spinach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–109 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DCD reduced spinach nitrate accumulation by 18 to 61%.

Treatment
DCDe0
Outcome
nitrate accumulatione0
Direction
reducee0
Value
18 and 61%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“DCD can reduce nitrate accumulation in spinach between 18 and 61%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1656–1721 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DMPP reduced spinach nitrate accumulation by 33 to 84%.

Treatment
DMPPe0
Outcome
nitrate accumulatione1
Direction
reducee1
Value
33 and 84%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“DMPP between 33 and 84%, without reducing yield or changing other quality characteristics.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1726–1816 · show in text ↑
e1

“DCD can reduce nitrate accumulation in spinach between 18 and 61% and DMPP between 33 and 84%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1656–1749 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrification inhibitors did not reduce spinach yield or change other quality characteristics.

Treatment
DCDe1
Outcome
yield or changing other quality characteristicse0
Direction
without reducinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“without reducing yield or changing other quality characteristics.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1751–1816 · show in text ↑
e1

“DCD can reduce nitrate accumulation in spinach between 18 and 61% and DMPP between 33 and 84%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1656–1749 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrification inhibitors are especially useful in spring under cool soil and high intercepted radiation.

Outcome
especially useful in the springe0
Qualifier
soil temperature is low and solar radiation interception by the crop is highe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“NIs are especially useful in the spring, when soil temperature is low and solar radiation interception by the crop is high.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1817–1940 · show in text ↑
t0

“spinach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–109 · show in text ↑

nitrification inhibitor · nutrient: content · Spinacia oleracea (spinach)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

phosphorus · nutrient: content · Spinacia oleracea (spinach)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Spinacia oleracea (spinach)Positive and negative results

60 papers: 53 positive, 7 negative or no effect

52 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

56 papers more in this group

See all 60 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.