Paper · 2011 · Annals of Applied Biology

Suppression of tan spot and plant growth promotion of wheat by synthetic and biological inducers under field conditions

A.E. Perelló; G.M. Dal Bello

15
claims
31
verbatim quotes
32
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Tan spot of wheat caused by Pyrenophora tritici-repentis (Ptr) is a major leaf spot disease. No single control measure is likely to be successful in controlling tan spot and a fully integrated system of disease management is more likely to achieve a long-term solution. Research to improve control efficacy has focused on fungicide improvement, resistant cultivars, the use of biological control agents (BCAs) mixtures and combinatorial approaches involving BCAs and plant resistance stimulants with complementary modes of action. Various biotic and abiotic agents can stimulate wheat defence mechanisms and so benefit resistance to Ptr infection. Among them, Trichoderma spp. have been widely used as antagonistic fungal agents against several pathogens as well as plant growth enhancers. Also, the synthetic agents acibenzolar-S-methyl (ASM) and thiamethoxam (TM) have provided broad-spectrum disease and pest control as well as enhanced plant vigour against several fungal diseases. The aim of this research was to evaluate the effectiveness of two Trichoderma harzianum strains and two substances of synthetic origin (ASM and TM) on the suppression of tan spot and plant growth promotion of wheat plants. When BCAs, ASM and TM were applied to field plots on wheat cultivar Klein Escorpion, the severity of tan spot reduced and plant height, fresh weight, dry weight of shoots and dry weight of roots increased in comparison with the control. When applied prior to Ptr inoculation, ASM, TM and the strain Th1 of T. harzianum caused a reduction in necrotic lesions >50% compared to the control treatment. Seed treatment with TM resulted in a significant enhancement of plant height. Application of ASM significantly increased foliar fresh weight by 45% as compared to the control treatment, whereas foliar fresh weight increased 29% and 50% when TM and T. harzianum strain Th1 were applied as seed coating. Acibenzolar-S-methyl alone or combined with Th1 increased dry weight to >60%, whereas the effects of TM and Th1 on dry mass showed an increase that ranged from 57% to 25%. Plants treated with Th1 and both synthetic compounds achieved up to sixfold increment in root dry weight over the control.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Field application of biological control agents reduced tan spot severity and increased wheat growth traits relative to control.

Material
Klein Escorpione0
Treatment
BCAse0
Interactor
Pyrenophora tritici-repentisPyrenophora tritici-repentise1pathogen
Outcome
severity of tan spote0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
the controle0
Setting
field plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pyrenophora tritici-repentis
Pyrenophora tritici-repentis · InteractorAgronom · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When BCAs, ASM and TM were applied to field plots on wheat cultivar Klein Escorpion, the severity of tan spot reduced and plant height, fresh weight, dry weight of shoots and dry weight of roots increased in comparison with the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1209–1445 · show in text ↑
e1

“Tan spot of wheat caused by Pyrenophora tritici-repentis (Ptr)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ASM reduced tan spot severity relative to control in field plots.

Treatment
ASMe0
Interactor
Pyrenophora tritici-repentisPyrenophora tritici-repentise1pathogen
Outcome
severity of tan spote0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pyrenophora tritici-repentis
Pyrenophora tritici-repentis · InteractorAgronom · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When BCAs, ASM and TM were applied to field plots on wheat cultivar Klein Escorpion, the severity of tan spot reduced and plant height, fresh weight, dry weight of shoots and dry weight of roots increased in comparison with the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1209–1445 · show in text ↑
e1

“Tan spot of wheat caused by Pyrenophora tritici-repentis (Ptr)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

TM reduced tan spot severity relative to control in field plots.

Treatment
TMe0
Interactor
Pyrenophora tritici-repentisPyrenophora tritici-repentise1pathogen
Outcome
severity of tan spote0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pyrenophora tritici-repentis
Pyrenophora tritici-repentis · InteractorAgronom · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When BCAs, ASM and TM were applied to field plots on wheat cultivar Klein Escorpion, the severity of tan spot reduced and plant height, fresh weight, dry weight of shoots and dry weight of roots increased in comparison with the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1209–1445 · show in text ↑
e1

“Tan spot of wheat caused by Pyrenophora tritici-repentis (Ptr)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ASM before Ptr inoculation reduced necrotic lesions by more than 50% relative to control.

Treatment
ASMe0
Interactor
Ptre0pathogen
Outcome
necrotic lesionse0
Direction
reductione0
Value
>50%e0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When applied prior to Ptr inoculation, ASM, TM and the strain Th1 of T. harzianum caused a reduction in necrotic lesions >50% compared to the control treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1446–1606 · show in text ↑
e1

“Tan spot of wheat caused by Pyrenophora tritici-repentis (Ptr)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

TM before Ptr inoculation reduced necrotic lesions by more than 50% relative to control.

Treatment
TMe0
Interactor
Ptre0pathogen
Outcome
necrotic lesionse0
Direction
reductione0
Value
>50%e0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When applied prior to Ptr inoculation, ASM, TM and the strain Th1 of T. harzianum caused a reduction in necrotic lesions >50% compared to the control treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1446–1606 · show in text ↑
e1

“Tan spot of wheat caused by Pyrenophora tritici-repentis (Ptr)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Th1 before Ptr inoculation reduced necrotic lesions by more than 50% relative to control.

Treatment
strain Th1 of T. harzianume0
Interactor
Ptre0pathogen
Second interactor
T. harzianumTrichoderma harzianume0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
necrotic lesionse0
Direction
reductione0
Value
>50%e0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trichoderma harzianum
Trichoderma harzianum · Second interactorUS Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Systematic Botany and Mycology Laboratory, [1] · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When applied prior to Ptr inoculation, ASM, TM and the strain Th1 of T. harzianum caused a reduction in necrotic lesions >50% compared to the control treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1446–1606 · show in text ↑
e1

“Tan spot of wheat caused by Pyrenophora tritici-repentis (Ptr)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

TM seed treatment significantly increased wheat plant height.

Treatment
TMe0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
enhancemente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seed treatment with TM resulted in a significant enhancement of plant height.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1607–1684 · show in text ↑
e1

“plant growth promotion of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

ASM increased foliar fresh weight by 45% compared with control.

Treatment
ASMe0
Outcome
foliar fresh weighte0
Direction
increasede0
Value
45%e0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of ASM significantly increased foliar fresh weight by 45% as compared to the control treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1685–1791 · show in text ↑
e1

“plant growth promotion of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

TM seed coating increased foliar fresh weight by 29%.

Treatment
TMe0
Outcome
foliar fresh weighte0
Direction
increasede0
Value
29%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“foliar fresh weight increased 29% and 50% when TM and T. harzianum strain Th1 were applied as seed coating.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1801–1908 · show in text ↑
e1

“plant growth promotion of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Th1 seed coating increased foliar fresh weight by 50%.

Treatment
T. harzianum strain Th1e0
Interactor
T. harzianum strain Th1Trichoderma harzianume0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
foliar fresh weighte0
Direction
increasede0
Value
50%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trichoderma harzianum
Trichoderma harzianum · InteractorUS Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Systematic Botany and Mycology Laboratory, [1] · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“foliar fresh weight increased 29% and 50% when TM and T. harzianum strain Th1 were applied as seed coating.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1801–1908 · show in text ↑
e1

“plant growth promotion of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ASM alone increased dry weight by more than 60%.

Treatment
Acibenzolar-S-methyl alonee0
Outcome
dry weighte0
Direction
increasede0
Value
>60%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Acibenzolar-S-methyl alone or combined with Th1 increased dry weight to >60%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1909–1985 · show in text ↑
e1

“plant growth promotion of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ASM combined with Th1 increased dry weight by more than 60%.

Treatment
combined with Th1e0
Interactor
Th1e0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
dry weighte0
Direction
increasede0
Value
>60%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Acibenzolar-S-methyl alone or combined with Th1 increased dry weight to >60%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1909–1985 · show in text ↑
e1

“plant growth promotion of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–59 · show in text ↑
e2

“T. harzianum strain Th1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1855–1878 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

TM increased dry mass within the reported 57% to 25% range.

Treatment
TMe0
Outcome
dry masse0
Direction
increasee0
Value
57% to 25%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the effects of TM and Th1 on dry mass showed an increase that ranged from 57% to 25%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1995–2080 · show in text ↑
e1

“plant growth promotion of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Th1 increased dry mass within the reported 57% to 25% range.

Treatment
Th1e0
Interactor
Th1e0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
dry masse0
Direction
increasee0
Value
57% to 25%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the effects of TM and Th1 on dry mass showed an increase that ranged from 57% to 25%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1995–2080 · show in text ↑
e1

“plant growth promotion of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Th1 and both synthetic compounds increased root dry weight up to sixfold over control.

Treatment
Th1 and both synthetic compoundse0
Interactor
Th1e0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
root dry weighte0
Direction
incremente0
Value
up to sixfolde0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plants treated with Th1 and both synthetic compounds achieved up to sixfold increment in root dry weight over the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2081–2203 · show in text ↑
e1

“plant growth promotion of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–59 · show in text ↑

thiamethoxam · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect

3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

Trichoderma harzianum · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 11 positive, 3 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

acibenzolar-S-methyl · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

thiamethoxam · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

acibenzolar-S-methyl · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

11 papers: 11 positive, 0 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Trichoderma harzianum · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

14 papers: 14 positive, 0 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.