Abstract
The article presents data on the positive effect of microbiological fertilizers that contain nitrogen-fixing, phosphorus- and potassium-mobilizing bacteria, and have biofungicidal properties on the sowing qualities of spring wheat, peas, lentils and sunflower seeds. Microbiological preparations increased the germination energy of untreated spring wheat seeds to 96-100% (control – 92%); laboratory germination at the same time was at the level of germination energy or slightly higher. The germination characteristics of seeds treated with Tiara (thiamethoxam) and Stinger (tebuconazole) were lower - germination energy was 86-97% (control 84%); germination ability was 91-99% (control 96%). Indicators of the length, mass and volume of seedlings and roots in the course of the treatment with biological preparations were higher than the control variant. The best results were obtained when treating non-pretreated wheat seeds with biological preparations Azotovit + Phosphatovit, RizoBash, BioAzFC and Phytosporin-M. The germination energy and germination ability of peas during treatment with biological preparations increased, respectively, by 4-10% and 6-12%, by 2-10% and 3-8% (in the case of treated seeds). Sunflower seeds treated with Maxim andKruiser, were characterized by lower values of germination energy, which indicates a decrease in the activity of growth processes of the treated seeds, although no sharp changes in germination values were observed: 89-93% depending on the biological preparation (the highest when treated with Phytosporin-M). In general, the positive effect of the studied microbiological preparations on the growth activity of seeds, including those treated with protectants, was revealed, which indicates the compatibility of the preparations. However, the germination energy of the treated seeds was noticeably less, therefore, the protectants somewhat delay the germination process.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 14
Claim · model-written summary
Microbiological preparations raised germination energy of untreated spring wheat seeds to 96–100% versus 92% control.
- Taxon
- spring wheat
Triticum aestivume0 - Treatment
- Microbiological preparationse0
- Outcome
- germination energye0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 96-100%e0
- Qualifier
- 92%e0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Microbiological preparations increased the germination energy of untreated spring wheat seeds to 96-100% (control – 92%)”
Claim · model-written summary
Laboratory germination of treated spring wheat was at the germination energy level or slightly higher.
- Taxon
- spring wheatTriticum aestivume1
- Outcome
- laboratory germinatione0
- Direction
- slightly highere0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“laboratory germination at the same time was at the level of germination energy or slightly higher”
t0“AGRICULTURAL SEEDS”
e1“Microbiological preparations increased the germination energy of untreated spring wheat seeds to 96-100% (control – 92%)”
Claim · model-written summary
Tiara and Stinger treated seeds had lower germination energy, 86–97%, against 84% control.
- Taxon
- spring wheatTriticum aestivume1
- Treatment
- Tiara (thiamethoxam) and Stinger (tebuconazole)e0
- Outcome
- germination energye0
- Direction
- lowere0
- Value
- 86-97%e0
- Qualifier
- 84%e0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The germination characteristics of seeds treated with Tiara (thiamethoxam) and Stinger (tebuconazole) were lower - germination energy was 86-97% (control 84%)”
t0“AGRICULTURAL SEEDS”
e1“Microbiological preparations increased the germination energy of untreated spring wheat seeds to 96-100% (control – 92%)”
Claim · model-written summary
Germination ability of chemically treated seeds was 91–99% versus 96% control.
- Taxon
- spring wheatTriticum aestivume1
- Outcome
- germination abilitye0
- Value
- 91-99%e0
- Qualifier
- 96%e0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“germination ability was 91-99% (control 96%)”
t0“AGRICULTURAL SEEDS”
e1“Microbiological preparations increased the germination energy of untreated spring wheat seeds to 96-100% (control – 92%)”
Claim · model-written summary
Biological preparations increased seedling and root length, mass and volume over control.
- Taxon
- spring wheatTriticum aestivume1
- Treatment
- biological preparationse0
- Outcome
- length, mass and volume of seedlings and rootse0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- control variante0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Indicators of the length, mass and volume of seedlings and roots in the course of the treatment with biological preparations were higher than the control variant.”
t0“AGRICULTURAL SEEDS”
e1“Microbiological preparations increased the germination energy of untreated spring wheat seeds to 96-100% (control – 92%)”
Claim · model-written summary
Azotovit + Phosphatovit, RizoBash, BioAzFC and Phytosporin-M gave the best results for non-pretreated wheat seeds.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- biological preparations Azotovit + Phosphatovit, RizoBash, BioAzFC and Phytosporin-Me0
- Outcome
- best resultse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The best results were obtained when treating non-pretreated wheat seeds with biological preparations Azotovit + Phosphatovit, RizoBash, BioAzFC and Phytosporin-M.”
Claim · model-written summary
Biological preparations increased pea germination energy by 4–10%.
- Taxon
- peas
Lathyrus oleraceuse0 - Treatment
- biological preparationse0
- Outcome
- germination energye0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 4-10%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The germination energy and germination ability of peas during treatment with biological preparations increased, respectively, by 4-10% and 6-12%, by 2-10% and 3-8% (in the case of treated seeds).”
Claim · model-written summary
Biological preparations increased pea germination ability by 6–12%.
- Taxon
- peasLathyrus oleraceuse0
- Treatment
- biological preparationse0
- Outcome
- germination abilitye0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 6-12%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The germination energy and germination ability of peas during treatment with biological preparations increased, respectively, by 4-10% and 6-12%, by 2-10% and 3-8% (in the case of treated seeds).”
Claim · model-written summary
For treated pea seeds, biological preparations increased germination energy by 2–10%.
- Taxon
- peasLathyrus oleraceuse0
- Treatment
- biological preparationse0
- Outcome
- germination energye0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 2-10%e0
- Qualifier
- in the case of treated seedse0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The germination energy and germination ability of peas during treatment with biological preparations increased, respectively, by 4-10% and 6-12%, by 2-10% and 3-8% (in the case of treated seeds).”
Claim · model-written summary
For treated pea seeds, biological preparations increased germination ability by 3–8%.
- Taxon
- peasLathyrus oleraceuse0
- Treatment
- biological preparationse0
- Outcome
- germination abilitye0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 3-8%e0
- Qualifier
- in the case of treated seedse0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The germination energy and germination ability of peas during treatment with biological preparations increased, respectively, by 4-10% and 6-12%, by 2-10% and 3-8% (in the case of treated seeds).”
Claim · model-written summary
Maxim andKruiser treated sunflower seeds had lower germination energy.
- Taxon
- Sunflower
Helianthus annuuse0 - Treatment
- Maxim andKruisere0
- Outcome
- germination energye0
- Direction
- lowere0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Sunflower seeds treated with Maxim andKruiser, were characterized by lower values of germination energy”
Claim · model-written summary
Sunflower seed germination was 89–93% depending on biological preparation, highest with Phytosporin-M.
- Taxon
- SunflowerHelianthus annuuse1
- Treatment
- Phytosporin-Me0
- Outcome
- germination valuese0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 89-93%e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“although no sharp changes in germination values were observed: 89-93% depending on the biological preparation (the highest when treated with Phytosporin-M)”
t0“AGRICULTURAL SEEDS”
e1“Sunflower seeds treated with Maxim andKruiser, were characterized by lower values of germination energy”
Claim · model-written summary
Microbiological preparations supported growth activity even in protectant treated seeds, suggesting compatibility.
- Taxon
- spring wheatTriticum aestivume1
- Treatment
- microbiological preparationse0
- Outcome
- growth activity of seedse0
- Direction
- positive effecte0
- Qualifier
- including those treated with protectantse0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the positive effect of the studied microbiological preparations on the growth activity of seeds, including those treated with protectants, was revealed, which indicates the compatibility of the preparations”
t0“AGRICULTURAL SEEDS”
e1“Microbiological preparations increased the germination energy of untreated spring wheat seeds to 96-100% (control – 92%)”
Claim · model-written summary
Protectants delayed germination, with noticeably less germination energy in treated seeds.
- Taxon
- spring wheatTriticum aestivume1
- Treatment
- protectantse0
- Outcome
- germination energye0
- Direction
- noticeably lesse0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the germination energy of the treated seeds was noticeably less, therefore, the protectants somewhat delay the germination process”
t0“AGRICULTURAL SEEDS”
e1“Microbiological preparations increased the germination energy of untreated spring wheat seeds to 96-100% (control – 92%)”
The same questions in other papers
thiamethoxam · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- positive
- negative
- no effect
tebuconazole · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
7 papers more in this group
See all 11 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.