Paper · 1992 · Australian Journal of Botany

CO2 × Nitrogen Interaction on Seedling Growth of Four Species of Eucalypt.

SC Wong; PE Kriedemann; GD Farquhar

16
claims
17
verbatim quotes
86
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Four eucalypt species were selected to represent two ecologically disparate groups which would be expected to contrast in seedling vigour and in the nature of growth responses to CO2 × nitrogen supply. Eucalyptus camaldulensis and E. cypellocarpa were taken as examples of fast-growing species with a wide distribution, that develop into large trees. By contrast, E. pauciflora and E. pulverulenta become smaller trees, and show a more limited distribution. Seedlings were established in pots (5 L) of a loamy soil and supplied with nutrient solution containing either 1.2 or 6.0 mM NO3- in both ambient (33 Pa) and CO2-enriched (66 Pa) greenhouses. Analysis of growth response to treatments (2 × 2 factorial) was based on destructive harvest of plants sampled on four occasions over 84 days for E. carnaldulensis and E. cypellocarpa, and 100 days for E. pulverulenta and E. pauciflora. A positive CO2 × N interaction on plant dry mass and leaf area was expressed in all species throughout the study period. In E. carnaldulensis and E. cypellocarpa, plant mass was doubled by high N at 33 Pa CO2, compared with a three to four-fold increase at 66 Pa to reach 34g by final harvest. In E. pulverulenta and E. pauciflora, slower growth resulted in about 50% less mass at a given age, but relative increases due to CO2 and N were of a similar order. A distinction can be made between N and CO2 effects on growth processes as follows. When trees were grown on low N, elevated CO2 increased nitrogen-use efficiency (NUE) at both leaf and whole plant levels. On high N, leaf NUE was increased in E. camaldulensis and E. cypellocarpa, but decreased in E. pulverulenta and E. pauciflora. Whole plant NUE showed no consistent response to elevated CO2 when plants were supplied high N. Net assimilation rate (NAR) was increased by elevated CO2 in all species on either N treatment. Moreover, high N increased NAR under either CO2 treatment in all species. There was a positive N × CO2 interaction on NAR in E. carnaldulensis and E. cypellocarpa, but not in E. pulverulenta and E. pauciflora. Growth indices for E. carnaldulensis and E. cypellocarpa species, and especially E. carnaldulensis, generally exceeded those for E. pulverulenta and E. pauciflora in terms of NAR, leaf NUE, N-enhancement of CO2 effects on leaf area and biomass, and non-structural carbohydrate content of foliage.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A positive CO2 x N interaction on plant dry mass and leaf area occurred in all four eucalypt species throughout the study.

Taxon
Eucalyptt0
Treatment
CO2 × N interactione0
Outcome
plant dry mass and leaf areae0
Direction
positivee0

Verbatim

t0

“Four Species of Eucalypt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–73 · show in text ↑
e0

“A positive CO2 × N interaction on plant dry mass and leaf area was expressed in all species throughout the study period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 887–1006 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In E. camaldulensis and E. cypellocarpa, high N doubled plant mass at 33 Pa CO2.

Taxon
E. carnaldulensis and E. cypellocarpae0
Treatment
high N at 33 Pa CO2e0
Outcome
plant masse0
Direction
doublede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“In E. carnaldulensis and E. cypellocarpa, plant mass was doubled by high N at 33 Pa CO2, compared with a three to four-fold increase at 66 Pa to reach 34g by final harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1008–1179 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In E. camaldulensis and E. cypellocarpa, high N gave a three to four-fold increase in plant mass at 66 Pa CO2, reaching 34 g by final harvest.

Taxon
E. carnaldulensis and E. cypellocarpae0
Treatment
high Ne0
Outcome
plant masse0
Direction
three to four-fold increasee0
Value
34ge0
Qualifier
66 Pae0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“In E. carnaldulensis and E. cypellocarpa, plant mass was doubled by high N at 33 Pa CO2, compared with a three to four-fold increase at 66 Pa to reach 34g by final harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1008–1179 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

E. pulverulenta and E. pauciflora grew more slowly and had about 50% less mass at a given age.

Taxon
E. pulverulenta and E. paucifloraEucalyptus paucifloraEucalyptus pulverulentae0
Outcome
masse0
Direction
lesse0
Value
about 50%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eucalyptus pauciflora
Eucalyptus pauciflora · TaxonJJ Harrison ( https://www.jjharrison.com.au/ ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Eucalyptus pulverulenta
Eucalyptus pulverulenta · TaxonDaderot · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In E. pulverulenta and E. pauciflora, slower growth resulted in about 50% less mass at a given age”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1181–1279 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In E. pulverulenta and E. pauciflora, relative increases due to CO2 and N were of a similar order as in the faster-growing species.

Taxon
E. pulverulenta and E. paucifloraEucalyptus paucifloraEucalyptus pulverulentae0
Treatment
CO2 and Ne0
Outcome
relative increasese0
Qualifier
of a similar ordere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eucalyptus pauciflora
Eucalyptus pauciflora · TaxonJJ Harrison ( https://www.jjharrison.com.au/ ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Eucalyptus pulverulenta
Eucalyptus pulverulenta · TaxonDaderot · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In E. pulverulenta and E. pauciflora, slower growth resulted in about 50% less mass at a given age, but relative increases due to CO2 and N were of a similar order”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1181–1344 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

On low N, elevated CO2 increased nitrogen-use efficiency at leaf and whole plant levels.

Taxon
treese0
Treatment
elevated CO2e0
Outcome
nitrogen-use efficiency (NUE)e0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
low Ne0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“When trees were grown on low N, elevated CO2 increased nitrogen-use efficiency (NUE) at both leaf and whole plant levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1430–1550 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

On high N, leaf NUE was increased in E. camaldulensis and E. cypellocarpa.

Taxon
E. camaldulensis and E. cypellocarpaEucalyptus camaldulensisEucalyptus cypellocarpae0
Outcome
leaf NUEe0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
On high Ne0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eucalyptus camaldulensis
Eucalyptus camaldulensis · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryGeekstreet · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Eucalyptus cypellocarpa
Eucalyptus cypellocarpa · TaxonPoyt448 Peter Woodard · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“On high N, leaf NUE was increased in E. camaldulensis and E. cypellocarpa, but decreased in E. pulverulenta and E. pauciflora”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1552–1677 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

On high N, leaf NUE was decreased in E. pulverulenta and E. pauciflora.

Taxon
E. pulverulenta and E. paucifloraEucalyptus paucifloraEucalyptus pulverulentae0
Outcome
leaf NUEe0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
On high Ne0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eucalyptus pauciflora
Eucalyptus pauciflora · TaxonJJ Harrison ( https://www.jjharrison.com.au/ ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Eucalyptus pulverulenta
Eucalyptus pulverulenta · TaxonDaderot · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“On high N, leaf NUE was increased in E. camaldulensis and E. cypellocarpa, but decreased in E. pulverulenta and E. pauciflora”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1552–1677 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Whole plant NUE showed no consistent response to elevated CO2 when plants received high N.

Taxon
plantsViridiplantaee0
Treatment
elevated CO2e0
Outcome
Whole plant NUEe0
Direction
no consistent responsee0
Qualifier
high Ne0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Whole plant NUE showed no consistent response to elevated CO2 when plants were supplied high N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1679–1773 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Net assimilation rate increased under elevated CO2 in all species on either N treatment.

Taxon
all speciese0
Treatment
elevated CO2e0
Outcome
Net assimilation rate (NAR)e0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
either N treatmente0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Net assimilation rate (NAR) was increased by elevated CO2 in all species on either N treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1775–1869 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High N increased NAR under either CO2 treatment in all species.

Taxon
all speciese0
Treatment
high Ne0
Outcome
NARe0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
either CO2 treatmente0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“high N increased NAR under either CO2 treatment in all species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1881–1943 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

There was a positive N x CO2 interaction on NAR in E. camaldulensis and E. cypellocarpa.

Taxon
E. carnaldulensis and E. cypellocarpae0
Treatment
N × CO2 interactione0
Outcome
NARe0
Direction
positivee0

Verbatim

e0

“There was a positive N × CO2 interaction on NAR in E. carnaldulensis and E. cypellocarpa, but not in E. pulverulenta and E. pauciflora”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1945–2079 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No N x CO2 interaction on NAR was found in E. pulverulenta and E. pauciflora.

Taxon
E. pulverulenta and E. paucifloraEucalyptus paucifloraEucalyptus pulverulentae0
Treatment
N × CO2 interactione0
Outcome
NARe0
Direction
note0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eucalyptus pauciflora
Eucalyptus pauciflora · TaxonJJ Harrison ( https://www.jjharrison.com.au/ ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Eucalyptus pulverulenta
Eucalyptus pulverulenta · TaxonDaderot · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was a positive N × CO2 interaction on NAR in E. carnaldulensis and E. cypellocarpa, but not in E. pulverulenta and E. pauciflora”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1945–2079 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Growth indices of E. camaldulensis and E. cypellocarpa generally exceeded those of E. pulverulenta and E. pauciflora for NAR and leaf NUE.

Taxon
E. carnaldulensis and E. cypellocarpae0
Outcome
NAR, leaf NUEe0
Direction
exceedede0
Comparator
E. pulverulenta and E. pauciflorae0

Verbatim

e0

“Growth indices for E. carnaldulensis and E. cypellocarpa species, and especially E. carnaldulensis, generally exceeded those for E. pulverulenta and E. pauciflora in terms of NAR, leaf NUE, N-enhancement of CO2 effects on leaf area and biomass, and non-structural carbohydrate content of foliage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2081–2376 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The N-enhancement of CO2 effects on leaf area and biomass was generally greater in E. camaldulensis and E. cypellocarpa than in E. pulverulenta and E. pauciflora.

Taxon
E. carnaldulensis and E. cypellocarpae0
Outcome
N-enhancement of CO2 effects on leaf area and biomasse0
Direction
exceedede0
Comparator
E. pulverulenta and E. pauciflorae0

Verbatim

e0

“Growth indices for E. carnaldulensis and E. cypellocarpa species, and especially E. carnaldulensis, generally exceeded those for E. pulverulenta and E. pauciflora in terms of NAR, leaf NUE, N-enhancement of CO2 effects on leaf area and biomass, and non-structural carbohydrate content of foliage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2081–2376 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Non-structural carbohydrate content of foliage generally exceeded in E. camaldulensis and E. cypellocarpa the level in E. pulverulenta and E. pauciflora.

Taxon
E. carnaldulensis and E. cypellocarpae0
Outcome
non-structural carbohydrate content of foliagee0
Direction
exceedede0
Comparator
E. pulverulenta and E. pauciflorae0

Verbatim

e0

“Growth indices for E. carnaldulensis and E. cypellocarpa species, and especially E. carnaldulensis, generally exceeded those for E. pulverulenta and E. pauciflora in terms of NAR, leaf NUE, N-enhancement of CO2 effects on leaf area and biomass, and non-structural carbohydrate content of foliage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2081–2376 · show in text ↑

co2 · nutrient: efficiency · Viridiplantae (plants)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.