Paper · 2003 · Acta Agronomica Hungarica

Yield and yield components of wheat subjected to water stress under rainfed conditions in Pakistan

R. H. Kazmi; M. Q. Khan; M. K. Abbasi

8
claims
15
verbatim quotes
5
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The investigation was concerned with the effects of water stress on the yield and yield components of wheat grown under rainfed conditions in Rawalakot, Pakistan. A pot experiment was conducted with four wheat genotypes, Inqlab-91, Chakwal-97, Rawal-87 and Kohsar-95, tested against five irrigation levels with drought imposed at different growth stages including control, terminal drought, post-anthesis drought, three irrigations and pre-anthesis drought. The parameters studied were flag leaf area, ear stalk length, number of grains per spike and grain yield per pot. Flag leaf area and ear stalk length exhibited a significant reduction of 14 and 36%, respectively, when wheat was subjected to water stress. The proportional reduction in yield was 40% with three irrigations and 98% in the case of pre-anthesis drought depending upon the extent and degree of stress. Results showed that wheat could withstand and tolerate drought only up to anthesis, after which water stress resulted in the complete failure of the crop. It could be deduced that the critical stage for moisture in wheat started 60 days after germination, and became more severe at 90 days, i.e. at the anthesis stage. Among the genotypes, Inqlab-91 was found to be more tolerant of drought and could thus be a good option for further testing and recommendation for rainfed areas.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Water stress significantly reduced flag leaf area by 14%.

Treatment
water stresse0
Outcome
Flag leaf areae0
Direction
reductione0
Value
14e0
Setting
Pakistant0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Flag leaf area and ear stalk length exhibited a significant reduction of 14 and 36%, respectively, when wheat was subjected to water stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 572–711 · show in text ↑
t0

“Yield and yield components of wheat subjected to water stress under rainfed conditions in Pakistan”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Water stress significantly reduced ear stalk length by 36%.

Treatment
water stresse0
Outcome
ear stalk lengthe0
Direction
reductione0
Value
36%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Flag leaf area and ear stalk length exhibited a significant reduction of 14 and 36%, respectively, when wheat was subjected to water stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 572–711 · show in text ↑
t0

“Yield and yield components of wheat subjected to water stress under rainfed conditions in Pakistan”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Three irrigations were associated with a 40% yield reduction.

Treatment
three irrigationse0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
reductione0
Value
40%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The proportional reduction in yield was 40% with three irrigations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 713–779 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–35 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pre-anthesis drought was associated with a 98% yield reduction.

Treatment
pre-anthesis droughte0
Outcome
yieldt0
Direction
reductione1
Value
98%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“98% in the case of pre-anthesis drought”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 784–823 · show in text ↑
t0

“Yield and yield components of wheat subjected to water stress under rainfed conditions in Pakistan”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–98 · show in text ↑
e1

“The proportional reduction in yield was 40% with three irrigations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 713–779 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat tolerated drought only up to anthesis; later stress caused complete crop failure.

Outcome
complete failure of the crope0
Qualifier
after which water stresse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheat could withstand and tolerate drought only up to anthesis, after which water stress resulted in the complete failure of the crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 892–1025 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The moisture critical stage began 60 days after germination and grew more severe at 90 days.

Outcome
critical stage for moisturee0
Value
60 dayse0
Qualifier
90 days, i.e. at the anthesis stagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“critical stage for moisture in wheat started 60 days after germination, and became more severe at 90 days, i.e. at the anthesis stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1056–1189 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inqlab-91 was the most drought tolerant genotype.

Material
Inqlab-91e0
Outcome
tolerant of droughte0
Direction
moree0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inqlab-91 was found to be more tolerant of drought”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1212–1262 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–35 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors identify Inqlab-91 for further testing and recommendation in rainfed areas.

Material
Inqlab-91e0
Outcome
further testing and recommendation for rainfed arease0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inqlab-91 was found to be more tolerant of drought and could thus be a good option for further testing and recommendation for rainfed areas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1212–1351 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–35 · show in text ↑

drought · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

431 papers: 86 positive, 345 negative or no effect

344 papers in the same direction as this paper · 86 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

427 papers more in this group

See all 431 papers →

drought · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

632 papers: 95 positive, 537 negative or no effect

536 papers in the same direction as this paper · 95 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

628 papers more in this group

See all 632 papers →

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

190 papers in the same direction as this paper · 798 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

985 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.