Paper · 2011 · Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis

Effects of15Nitrogen-Labeled Gel-Based Controlled-Release Fertilizer on Dry-Matter Accumulation and the Nutrient-Uptake Efficiency of Corn

Hong Ding; Yushu Zhang; Shengjin Qin; et al.

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
7
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Effects of a new gel-based controlled-release fertilizer (G-CRF) on the growth and nutrient uptake efficiency of corn were investigated based on a pot experiment. The fate of fertilizer nitrogen (N) was also studied by 15N tracer method. The results showed that, compared with conventional fertilizer, the G-CRF had significant effects on increasing dry matter, N, phosphorus (P), and potassium (K) accumulations, which increased by 6.4% (P < 0.05), 14.2% (P < 0.01), 8.0% (P < 0.01), and 6.0% (P < 0.05), respectively, in the mature stage. The 15N tracer experiment showed N-uptake efficiency in G-CRF treatment increased by 8.0% and loss rate decreased by 8.9% compared with conventional fertilizer treatment. Application of G-CRF improved P and K uptake efficiency by 5.8 and 11.6 percentage points in the mature stage. Thus, the results implied the G-CRF tested could provide essential plant nutrients including N, P, and K and delay the release of them efficiently. Moreover, G-CRF had significant effects on improving nutrient-uptake efficiencies and plant yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

G-CRF increased corn dry matter accumulation by 6.4% compared with conventional fertilizer at maturity.

Organ / stage
mature stagee1
Treatment
gel-based controlled-release fertilizer (G-CRF)e0
Outcome
dry mattere1
Direction
increasede1
Value
6.4%e1
Qualifier
P < 0.05e1
Comparator
conventional fertilizere1
Setting
pot experimente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a new gel-based controlled-release fertilizer (G-CRF) on the growth and nutrient uptake efficiency of corn were investigated based on a pot experiment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 11–161 · show in text ↑
e1

“compared with conventional fertilizer, the G-CRF had significant effects on increasing dry matter, N, phosphorus (P), and potassium (K) accumulations, which increased by 6.4% (P < 0.05), 14.2% (P < 0.01), 8.0% (P < 0.01), and 6.0% (P < 0.05), respectively, in the mature stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 263–539 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

G-CRF increased corn N accumulation by 14.2% compared with conventional fertilizer at maturity.

Organ / stage
mature stagee1
Treatment
G-CRFe1
Outcome
Ne1
Direction
increasede1
Value
14.2%e1
Qualifier
P < 0.01e1
Comparator
conventional fertilizere1
Setting
pot experimente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a new gel-based controlled-release fertilizer (G-CRF) on the growth and nutrient uptake efficiency of corn were investigated based on a pot experiment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 11–161 · show in text ↑
e1

“compared with conventional fertilizer, the G-CRF had significant effects on increasing dry matter, N, phosphorus (P), and potassium (K) accumulations, which increased by 6.4% (P < 0.05), 14.2% (P < 0.01), 8.0% (P < 0.01), and 6.0% (P < 0.05), respectively, in the mature stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 263–539 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

G-CRF increased corn phosphorus accumulation by 8.0% compared with conventional fertilizer at maturity.

Organ / stage
mature stagee1
Treatment
G-CRFe1
Outcome
phosphorus (P)e1
Direction
increasede1
Value
8.0%e1
Qualifier
P < 0.01e1
Comparator
conventional fertilizere1
Setting
pot experimente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a new gel-based controlled-release fertilizer (G-CRF) on the growth and nutrient uptake efficiency of corn were investigated based on a pot experiment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 11–161 · show in text ↑
e1

“compared with conventional fertilizer, the G-CRF had significant effects on increasing dry matter, N, phosphorus (P), and potassium (K) accumulations, which increased by 6.4% (P < 0.05), 14.2% (P < 0.01), 8.0% (P < 0.01), and 6.0% (P < 0.05), respectively, in the mature stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 263–539 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

G-CRF increased corn potassium accumulation by 6.0% compared with conventional fertilizer at maturity.

Organ / stage
mature stagee1
Treatment
G-CRFe1
Outcome
potassium (K)e1
Direction
increasede1
Value
6.0%e1
Qualifier
P < 0.05e1
Comparator
conventional fertilizere1
Setting
pot experimente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a new gel-based controlled-release fertilizer (G-CRF) on the growth and nutrient uptake efficiency of corn were investigated based on a pot experiment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 11–161 · show in text ↑
e1

“compared with conventional fertilizer, the G-CRF had significant effects on increasing dry matter, N, phosphorus (P), and potassium (K) accumulations, which increased by 6.4% (P < 0.05), 14.2% (P < 0.01), 8.0% (P < 0.01), and 6.0% (P < 0.05), respectively, in the mature stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 263–539 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

G-CRF increased N-uptake efficiency by 8.0% compared with conventional fertilizer.

Treatment
G-CRFe1
Outcome
N-uptake efficiencye1
Direction
increasede1
Value
8.0%e1
Comparator
conventional fertilizer treatmente1
Setting
pot experimente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a new gel-based controlled-release fertilizer (G-CRF) on the growth and nutrient uptake efficiency of corn were investigated based on a pot experiment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 11–161 · show in text ↑
e1

“The 15N tracer experiment showed N-uptake efficiency in G-CRF treatment increased by 8.0% and loss rate decreased by 8.9% compared with conventional fertilizer treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 541–710 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

G-CRF decreased the N loss rate by 8.9% compared with conventional fertilizer.

Treatment
G-CRFe1
Outcome
loss ratee1
Direction
decreasede1
Value
8.9%e1
Comparator
conventional fertilizer treatmente1
Setting
pot experimente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a new gel-based controlled-release fertilizer (G-CRF) on the growth and nutrient uptake efficiency of corn were investigated based on a pot experiment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 11–161 · show in text ↑
e1

“The 15N tracer experiment showed N-uptake efficiency in G-CRF treatment increased by 8.0% and loss rate decreased by 8.9% compared with conventional fertilizer treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 541–710 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

G-CRF improved P uptake efficiency by 5.8 percentage points at the mature stage.

Organ / stage
mature stagee1
Treatment
G-CRFe1
Outcome
P and K uptake efficiencye1
Direction
improvede1
Value
5.8e1
Qualifier
percentage pointse1
Setting
pot experimente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a new gel-based controlled-release fertilizer (G-CRF) on the growth and nutrient uptake efficiency of corn were investigated based on a pot experiment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 11–161 · show in text ↑
e1

“Application of G-CRF improved P and K uptake efficiency by 5.8 and 11.6 percentage points in the mature stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 712–821 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

G-CRF improved K uptake efficiency by 11.6 percentage points at the mature stage.

Organ / stage
mature stagee1
Treatment
G-CRFe1
Outcome
P and K uptake efficiencye1
Direction
improvede1
Value
11.6e1
Qualifier
percentage pointse1
Setting
pot experimente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a new gel-based controlled-release fertilizer (G-CRF) on the growth and nutrient uptake efficiency of corn were investigated based on a pot experiment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 11–161 · show in text ↑
e1

“Application of G-CRF improved P and K uptake efficiency by 5.8 and 11.6 percentage points in the mature stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 712–821 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

G-CRF improved nutrient-uptake efficiencies and plant yield of corn.

Treatment
G-CRFe1
Outcome
nutrient-uptake efficiencies and plant yielde1
Direction
improvinge1
Setting
pot experimente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a new gel-based controlled-release fertilizer (G-CRF) on the growth and nutrient uptake efficiency of corn were investigated based on a pot experiment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 11–161 · show in text ↑
e1

“G-CRF had significant effects on improving nutrient-uptake efficiencies and plant yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 981–1068 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

G-CRF could delay the release of N, P and K from the fertilizer.

Treatment
G-CRFe1
Outcome
release of theme1
Direction
delaye1
Qualifier
efficientlye1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Effects of a new gel-based controlled-release fertilizer (G-CRF) on the growth and nutrient uptake efficiency of corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–117 · show in text ↑
e1

“the results implied the G-CRF tested could provide essential plant nutrients including N, P, and K and delay the release of them efficiently”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 829–969 · show in text ↑

fertilization · nutrient: efficiency · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

189 papers: 174 positive, 15 negative or no effect

173 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

185 papers more in this group

See all 189 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,164 papers: 1,026 positive, 138 negative or no effect

1,025 papers in the same direction as this paper · 127 in the opposite direction · 11 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

1,160 papers more in this group

See all 1,164 papers →

fertilization · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,365 papers: 1,196 positive, 169 negative or no effect

1,195 papers in the same direction as this paper · 149 in the opposite direction · 20 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

1,361 papers more in this group

See all 1,365 papers →

fertilization · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

3,908 papers: 3,485 positive, 423 negative or no effect

3,484 papers in the same direction as this paper · 338 in the opposite direction · 85 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

3,904 papers more in this group

See all 3,908 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.