Paper · 2017 · Frontiers in Plant Science

Responses of Nitrogen Utilization and Apparent Nitrogen Loss to Different Control Measures in the Wheat and Maize Rotation System

Zhengping Peng; Yanan Liu; Yingchun Li; et al.

12
claims
29
verbatim quotes
40
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Nitrogen (N) is an essential macronutrient for plant growth and excessive application rates can decrease crop yield and increase N loss into the environment. Field experiments were carried out to understand the effects of N fertilizers on N utilization, crop yield and net income in wheat and maize rotation system of the North China Plain (NCP). Compared to farmers’ N rate (FN), the yield of wheat and maize in reduction N rate by 21-24% based on FN (RN) was improved by 451 kg ha-1, N uptakes improved by 17 kg ha-1 and net income increased by 1671 CNY ha-1, while apparent N loss was reduced by 156 kg ha-1. The controlled-release fertilizer with a 20% reduction of RN (CRF80%), a 20% reduction of RN together with dicyandiamide (RN80%+DCD) and a 20% reduction of RN added with nano-carbon (RN80%+NC) all resulted in an improvement in crop yield and decreased the apparent N losses compared to RN. Contrasted with RN80%+NC, the total crop yield in RN80%+DCD improved by 1185 kg ha-1, N uptake enhanced by 9 kg ha-1 and net income increased by 3929 CNY ha-1, while apparent N loss was similar. Therefore, a 37-39% overall decrease in N rate compared to farmers plus the nitrification inhibitor, DCD, was effective N control measure that increased crop yields, enhanced N efficiencies, and improved economic benefits, while mitigating apparent N loss. There is considerable scope for improved N use effieincy in the intensive wheat -maize rotation of the NCP.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced nitrogen rate increased wheat and maize yield by 451 kg ha-1 relative to farmers’ rate.

Taxon
wheat and maizeTriticum aestivumZea mayse0
Treatment
reduction N rate by 21-24% based on FN (RN)e0
Outcome
yield of wheat and maizee0
Direction
improvede0
Value
451 kg ha-1e0
Comparator
farmers’ N rate (FN)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared to farmers’ N rate (FN), the yield of wheat and maize in reduction N rate by 21-24% based on FN (RN) was improved by 451 kg ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 347–484 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced nitrogen rate increased nitrogen uptake by 17 kg ha-1.

Taxon
wheat and maizeTriticum aestivumZea mayst0
Treatment
reduction N rate by 21-24% based on FN (RN)e1
Outcome
N uptakese0
Direction
improvede0
Value
17 kg ha-1e0
Comparator
farmers’ N rate (FN)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“N uptakes improved by 17 kg ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 486–518 · show in text ↑
e1

“Compared to farmers’ N rate (FN), the yield of wheat and maize in reduction N rate by 21-24% based on FN (RN) was improved by 451 kg ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 347–484 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat and Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced nitrogen rate increased net income by 1671 CNY ha-1.

Taxon
wheat and maizeTriticum aestivumZea mayst0
Treatment
reduction N rate by 21-24% based on FN (RN)e1
Outcome
net incomee0
Direction
increasede0
Value
1671 CNY ha-1e0
Comparator
farmers’ N rate (FN)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“net income increased by 1671 CNY ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 523–560 · show in text ↑
e1

“Compared to farmers’ N rate (FN), the yield of wheat and maize in reduction N rate by 21-24% based on FN (RN) was improved by 451 kg ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 347–484 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat and Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced nitrogen rate reduced apparent nitrogen loss by 156 kg ha-1.

Taxon
wheat and maizeTriticum aestivumZea mayst0
Treatment
reduction N rate by 21-24% based on FN (RN)e1
Outcome
apparent N losse0
Direction
reducede0
Value
156 kg ha-1e0
Comparator
farmers’ N rate (FN)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“apparent N loss was reduced by 156 kg ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 568–610 · show in text ↑
e1

“Compared to farmers’ N rate (FN), the yield of wheat and maize in reduction N rate by 21-24% based on FN (RN) was improved by 451 kg ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 347–484 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat and Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CRF80% improved crop yield and decreased apparent nitrogen losses relative to RN.

Taxon
wheat and maizeTriticum aestivumZea mayst0
Treatment
controlled-release fertilizer with a 20% reduction of RN (CRF80%)e0
Outcome
crop yield and decreased the apparent N lossese0
Direction
improvemente0
Comparator
RNe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The controlled-release fertilizer with a 20% reduction of RN (CRF80%), a 20% reduction of RN together with dicyandiamide (RN80%+DCD) and a 20% reduction of RN added with nano-carbon (RN80%+NC) all resulted in an improvement in crop yield and decreased the apparent N losses compared to RN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 612–900 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat and Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RN80% plus DCD improved crop yield and decreased nitrogen losses relative to RN.

Taxon
wheat and maizeTriticum aestivumZea mayst0
Treatment
a 20% reduction of RN together with dicyandiamide (RN80%+DCD)e0
Outcome
crop yield and decreased the apparent N lossese0
Direction
improvemente0
Comparator
RNe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a 20% reduction of RN together with dicyandiamide (RN80%+DCD) and a 20% reduction of RN added with nano-carbon (RN80%+NC) all resulted in an improvement in crop yield and decreased the apparent N losses compared to RN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 683–900 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat and Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RN80% plus nano carbon improved crop yield and decreased nitrogen losses relative to RN.

Taxon
wheat and maizeTriticum aestivumZea mayst0
Treatment
a 20% reduction of RN added with nano-carbon (RN80%+NC)e0
Outcome
crop yield and decreased the apparent N lossese0
Direction
improvemente0
Comparator
RNe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a 20% reduction of RN added with nano-carbon (RN80%+NC) all resulted in an improvement in crop yield and decreased the apparent N losses compared to RN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 749–900 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat and Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RN80% plus DCD increased total crop yield by 1185 kg ha-1 relative to nano carbon.

Taxon
wheat and maizeTriticum aestivumZea mayst0
Treatment
RN80%+DCDe0
Outcome
total crop yielde0
Direction
improvede0
Value
1185 kg ha-1e0
Comparator
RN80%+NCe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Contrasted with RN80%+NC, the total crop yield in RN80%+DCD improved by 1185 kg ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 902–986 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat and Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RN80% plus DCD enhanced nitrogen uptake by 9 kg ha-1 relative to nano carbon.

Taxon
wheat and maizeTriticum aestivumZea mayst0
Treatment
RN80%+DCDe1
Outcome
N uptakee0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
9 kg ha-1e0
Comparator
RN80%+NCe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“N uptake enhanced by 9 kg ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 988–1018 · show in text ↑
e1

“Contrasted with RN80%+NC, the total crop yield in RN80%+DCD improved by 1185 kg ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 902–986 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat and Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RN80% plus DCD increased net income by 3929 CNY ha-1 relative to nano carbon.

Taxon
wheat and maizeTriticum aestivumZea mayst0
Treatment
RN80%+DCDe1
Outcome
net incomee0
Direction
increasede0
Value
3929 CNY ha-1e0
Comparator
RN80%+NCe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“net income increased by 3929 CNY ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1023–1060 · show in text ↑
e1

“Contrasted with RN80%+NC, the total crop yield in RN80%+DCD improved by 1185 kg ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 902–986 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat and Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Apparent nitrogen loss was similar for DCD and nano carbon.

Taxon
wheat and maizeTriticum aestivumZea mayst0
Treatment
RN80%+DCDe1
Outcome
apparent N losse0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
RN80%+NCe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“apparent N loss was similar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1068–1095 · show in text ↑
e1

“Contrasted with RN80%+NC, the total crop yield in RN80%+DCD improved by 1185 kg ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 902–986 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat and Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–113 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend an overall 37 to 39 percent nitrogen rate reduction plus DCD to improve crop yield, nitrogen efficiency and income while reducing nitrogen loss.

Taxon
wheat and maizeTriticum aestivumZea mayst0
Treatment
37-39% overall decrease in N rate compared to farmers plus the nitrification inhibitor, DCDe0
Outcome
effective N control measuree0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a 37-39% overall decrease in N rate compared to farmers plus the nitrification inhibitor, DCD, was effective N control measure that increased crop yields, enhanced N efficiencies, and improved economic benefits, while mitigating apparent N loss”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1108–1352 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat and Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–113 · show in text ↑

cyanoguanidine · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

9 papers: 5 positive, 4 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

cyanoguanidine · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

19 papers: 13 positive, 6 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

nanoparticle · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

233 papers: 215 positive, 18 negative or no effect

214 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

229 papers more in this group

See all 233 papers →

nanoparticle · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

260 papers: 242 positive, 18 negative or no effect

241 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

256 papers more in this group

See all 260 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2,061 papers: 1,737 positive, 324 negative or no effect

1,736 papers in the same direction as this paper · 285 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2,057 papers more in this group

See all 2,061 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

2,185 papers: 1,906 positive, 279 negative or no effect

1,905 papers in the same direction as this paper · 234 in the opposite direction · 45 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

2,181 papers more in this group

See all 2,185 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

3,114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

fertilization · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

3,908 papers: 3,485 positive, 423 negative or no effect

3,484 papers in the same direction as this paper · 338 in the opposite direction · 85 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3,904 papers more in this group

See all 3,908 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.