Paper · 2019 · Biology and Fertility of Soils

Effects of urease and nitrification inhibitors on soil N, nitrifier abundance and activity in a sandy loam soil

Qingling Fu; Maïder Abadie; Aimeric Blaud; et al.

3
claims
6
verbatim quotes
92
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Inhibitors of urease and ammonia monooxygenase can limit the rate of conversion of urea to ammonia and ammonia to nitrate, respectively, potentially improving N fertilizer use efficiency and reducing gaseous losses. Winter wheat grown on a sandy soil in the UK was treated with urea fertilizer with the urease inhibitor N-(n-butyl) thiophosphoric triamide (NBPT), the nitrification inhibitor dicyandiamide (DCD) or a combination of both. The effects on soil microbial community diversity, the abundance of genes involved in nitrification and crop yields and net N recovery were compared. The only significant effect on N-cycle genes was a transient reduction in bacterial ammonia monooxygenase abundance following DCD application. However, overall crop yields and net N recovery were significantly lower in the urea treatments compared with an equivalent application of ammonium nitrate fertilizer, and significantly less for urea with DCD than the other urea treatments.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

DCD application transiently reduced bacterial ammonia monooxygenase abundance in the soil under winter wheat.

Taxon
Winter wheatTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
DCD applicatione2
Outcome
bacterial ammonia monooxygenase abundancee2
Direction
reductione2
Qualifier
transiente2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Winter wheat grown on a sandy soil in the UK”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 216–260 · show in text ↑
e2

“The only significant effect on N-cycle genes was a transient reduction in bacterial ammonia monooxygenase abundance following DCD application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 588–729 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Urea treatments gave significantly lower crop yields and net N recovery than an equivalent application of ammonium nitrate fertilizer in winter wheat.

Taxon
Winter wheatTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
urea treatmentse3
Outcome
crop yields and net N recoverye3
Direction
lowere3
Comparator
ammonium nitrate fertilizere3
Setting
sandy soil in the UKe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Winter wheat grown on a sandy soil in the UK”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 216–260 · show in text ↑
e3

“overall crop yields and net N recovery were significantly lower in the urea treatments compared with an equivalent application of ammonium nitrate fertilizer, and significantly less for urea with DCD than the other urea treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 740–970 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Urea with DCD gave significantly lower crop yields and net N recovery than the other urea treatments in winter wheat.

Taxon
Winter wheatTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
urea with DCDe3
Outcome
crop yields and net N recoverye3
Direction
lesse3
Comparator
other urea treatmentse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Winter wheat grown on a sandy soil in the UK”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 216–260 · show in text ↑
e3

“overall crop yields and net N recovery were significantly lower in the urea treatments compared with an equivalent application of ammonium nitrate fertilizer, and significantly less for urea with DCD than the other urea treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 740–970 · show in text ↑

cyanoguanidine · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

19 papers: 13 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2,061 papers: 1,737 positive, 324 negative or no effect

323 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1,737 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2,057 papers more in this group

See all 2,061 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.