Paper · 1975 · Annals of Applied Biology

Effects of variation in temperature and light intensity at different times on growth and yield of spring wheat

MARGARET A. FORD; GILLIAN N. THORNE

17
claims
39
verbatim quotes
24
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

SUMMARY Spring wheat grown in pots outdoors was transferred to growth rooms for various periods to study the effect of increasing the temperature from 14‐4 to 20‐3 o C (Expt 1) or from day/night values of 15‐0/15‐2 to 20‐0/15‐2 o C (Expt 2) and of increasing the amount of visible radiation in a 16 h day from 424 to 792 J cm ‐2 (Expt 1) or 374 to 740 J cm ‐2 (Expt 2). There were no interactions between temperature and radiation. In Expt 1 neither the increase in temperature nor extra radiation, applied for 14 days immediately after the appearance of double ridges on the stem apex, or 14 days later, increased grain yield at maturity. Warmth early, but not late, increased dry weight, leaf area and the number of floret primordia immediately after treatment, but these effects had disappeared by anthesis, 30 days later. Dry weight but not leaf area was increased by extra radiation but the effects had disappeared 2 wk after treatment. An increase in temperature imposed for 16 days starting 5 or 21 days after anthesis (Expt 2) increased dry weight of the ear and decreased that of the rest of the plant immediately after treatment, and decreased leaf area at all times. When plants from the two temperatures were put together in the same conditions, ear growth of plants that had been in the warm was slower than that of plants from the cold treatment, so that the difference in ear weight observed after 16 days of treatment reversed and grain yield was decreased by warmth applied in either period; the component of yield decreased by warmth was grain size. Additional radiation in either post‐anthesis period increased dry weight of all parts of the plant and had negligible effects on leaf area. Final grain yield was increased by c. 15% because the individual grains were larger. Early treatment also increased grain number slightly. The effects of treatment during the two post‐anthesis periods were similar in size, and additive.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 17

Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Temperature and radiation had no interaction.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
interactions between temperature and radiatione0
Direction
no interactionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There were no interactions between temperature and radiation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 370–431 · show in text ↑
t0

“spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early post-double-ridge warmth did not increase final grain yield.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
increase in temperaturee0
Outcome
grain yield at maturitye0
Direction
no_changeinferrede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“neither the increase in temperature nor extra radiation, applied for 14 days immediately after the appearance of double ridges on the stem apex, or 14 days later, increased grain yield at maturity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 442–639 · show in text ↑
t0

“spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Extra radiation around double-ridge appearance did not increase final grain yield.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
extra radiatione0
Outcome
grain yield at maturitye0
Direction
no_changeinferrede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“neither the increase in temperature nor extra radiation, applied for 14 days immediately after the appearance of double ridges on the stem apex, or 14 days later, increased grain yield at maturity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 442–639 · show in text ↑
t0

“spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early warmth increased dry weight, leaf area and floret primordia immediately after treatment.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Warmth earlye0
Outcome
dry weight, leaf area and the number of floret primordiae0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
latee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Warmth early, but not late, increased dry weight, leaf area and the number of floret primordia immediately after treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 640–762 · show in text ↑
t0

“spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–110 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early warmth effects had disappeared by anthesis.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Organ / stage
anthesise0
Outcome
these effectse0
Direction
disappearede0
Value
30 dayse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“these effects had disappeared by anthesis, 30 days later.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 768–825 · show in text ↑
t0

“spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Extra radiation increased dry weight, but not leaf area, transiently.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
extra radiatione0
Outcome
Dry weighte0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
effects had disappeared 2 wk after treatmente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Dry weight but not leaf area was increased by extra radiation but the effects had disappeared 2 wk after treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 826–941 · show in text ↑
t0

“spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Extra radiation did not increase leaf area.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
extra radiatione0
Outcome
leaf areae0
Direction
no_changeinferrede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Dry weight but not leaf area was increased by extra radiation but the effects had disappeared 2 wk after treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 826–941 · show in text ↑
t0

“spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Post-anthesis warmth increased ear dry weight immediately after treatment.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
increase in temperaturee1
Outcome
dry weight of the eare0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased dry weight of the ear and decreased that of the rest of the plant immediately after treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1035–1138 · show in text ↑
t0

“spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–110 · show in text ↑
e1

“An increase in temperature imposed for 16 days starting 5 or 21 days after anthesis (Expt 2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 942–1034 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Post-anthesis warmth decreased dry weight in the rest of the plant immediately after treatment.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
increase in temperaturee1
Outcome
that of the rest of the plante0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased dry weight of the ear and decreased that of the rest of the plant immediately after treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1035–1138 · show in text ↑
t0

“spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–110 · show in text ↑
e1

“An increase in temperature imposed for 16 days starting 5 or 21 days after anthesis (Expt 2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 942–1034 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Post-anthesis warmth decreased leaf area at all times.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
increase in temperaturee1
Outcome
leaf areae0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“and decreased leaf area at all times.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1140–1177 · show in text ↑
t0

“spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–110 · show in text ↑
e1

“An increase in temperature imposed for 16 days starting 5 or 21 days after anthesis (Expt 2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 942–1034 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Previously warmed plants subsequently had slower ear growth than cold-treated plants.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
ear growthe0
Direction
slowere0
Comparator
cold treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ear growth of plants that had been in the warm was slower than that of plants from the cold treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1258–1359 · show in text ↑
t0

“spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Post-anthesis warmth in either period decreased grain yield through smaller grains.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
warmth applied in either periode0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
grain sizee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“grain yield was decreased by warmth applied in either period; the component of yield decreased by warmth was grain size.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1447–1567 · show in text ↑
t0

“spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Post-anthesis extra radiation increased dry weight of all plant parts.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Additional radiatione0
Outcome
dry weight of all parts of the plante0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Additional radiation in either post‐anthesis period increased dry weight of all parts of the plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1568–1666 · show in text ↑
t0

“spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Post-anthesis extra radiation had negligible effect on leaf area.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Additional radiatione1
Outcome
leaf areae0
Direction
negligible effectse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“and had negligible effects on leaf area.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1667–1707 · show in text ↑
t0

“spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–110 · show in text ↑
e1

“Additional radiation in either post‐anthesis period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1568–1619 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Post-anthesis extra radiation raised final grain yield by about 15% through larger grains.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Additional radiatione1
Outcome
Final grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
c. 15%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Final grain yield was increased by c. 15% because the individual grains were larger.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1708–1792 · show in text ↑
t0

“spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–110 · show in text ↑
e1

“Additional radiation in either post‐anthesis period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1568–1619 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early extra radiation slightly increased grain number.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Early treatmente0
Outcome
grain numbere0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Early treatment also increased grain number slightly.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1793–1846 · show in text ↑
t0

“spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–110 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Effects of the two post-anthesis treatment periods were similarly sized and additive.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
effects of treatmente0
Direction
similar in size, and additivee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effects of treatment during the two post‐anthesis periods were similar in size, and additive.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1847–1944 · show in text ↑
t0

“spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–110 · show in text ↑

radiation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

39 papers: 23 positive, 16 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

35 papers more in this group

See all 39 papers →

radiation · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

89 papers: 35 positive, 54 negative or no effect

34 papers in the same direction as this paper · 51 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

85 papers more in this group

See all 89 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.