Paper · 1981 · PLANT PHYSIOLOGY

Rapid Suppression of Growth by Blue Light

Daniel J. Cosgrove

8
claims
8
verbatim quotes
247
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The inhibition of stem elongation in dark-grown seedlings by blue light was studied with marking techniques and with a high-resolution, growth-measuring apparatus. Blue light rapidly suppresses growth in a variety of cultivated species. In some species, the inhibition persists only during the period of irradiation, after which time growth quickly returns to the high dark rate, whereas, in other species, the light response has an additional long-term component which lasts for at least several hours in the dark. The long-term inhibition may be mediated by phytochrome, whereas the rapid, short-term component is specific to a blue-light receptor.The rapid inhibition of growth in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) requires high-energy blue irradiation, which is perceived directly by the growing region of the hypocotyl and inhibits all regions below the hook to the same extent. Detailed investigation of the kinetics of the inhibition in cucumber and in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) shows that, after a short lag period (20 to 30 seconds in cucumber, 60 to 70 seconds in sunflower), the growth rate declines in an exponential fashion to a lower rate, with a half-time of 15 to 25 seconds in cucumber and 90 to 150 seconds in sunflower. Excision of the hypocotyl greatly reduces the sensitivity of the growth rate to blue-light inhibition. Because of the rapid kinetics, the blue-light photoreceptor cannot affect cell enlargement by altering the supply of growth hormone or the sensitivity to hormones but probably operates more directly either on the biochemical process which loosens cell walls or on cell turgor.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Blue light rapidly suppresses growth in a variety of cultivated species.

Taxon
cultivated speciese0
Treatment
Blue lighte0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
suppressese0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Blue light rapidly suppresses growth in a variety of cultivated species.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 164–236 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In some species, growth inhibition lasts only during irradiation and growth then returns quickly to the dark rate.

Taxon
speciese0
Outcome
inhibition persists only during the period of irradiatione0
Qualifier
growth quickly returns to the high dark ratee0

Verbatim

e0

“In some species, the inhibition persists only during the period of irradiation, after which time growth quickly returns to the high dark rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 237–378 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In other species, blue-light growth inhibition lasts for at least several hours in darkness.

Taxon
speciese0
Outcome
additional long-term componente0
Value
at least several hourse0

Verbatim

e0

“in other species, the light response has an additional long-term component which lasts for at least several hours in the dark”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 389–514 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rapid growth inhibition in cucumber requires high-energy blue irradiation perceived by the growing hypocotyl region and affects all regions below the hook equally.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse0
Organ / stage
hypocotyle0
Treatment
high-energy blue irradiatione0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
inhibitione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The rapid inhibition of growth in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) requires high-energy blue irradiation, which is perceived directly by the growing region of the hypocotyl and inhibits all regions below the hook to the same extent.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 650–879 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After a 20 to 30 second lag, cucumber growth rate declines exponentially with a 15 to 25 second half-time.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse0
Outcome
growth ratee0
Direction
declinese0
Value
15 to 25 secondse0
Qualifier
20 to 30 seconds in cucumbere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“after a short lag period (20 to 30 seconds in cucumber, 60 to 70 seconds in sunflower), the growth rate declines in an exponential fashion to a lower rate, with a half-time of 15 to 25 seconds in cucumber and 90 to 150 seconds in sunflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1001–1240 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After a 60 to 70 second lag, sunflower growth rate declines exponentially with a 90 to 150 second half-time.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuuse0
Outcome
growth ratee0
Direction
declinese0
Value
90 to 150 secondse0
Qualifier
60 to 70 seconds in sunflowere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“after a short lag period (20 to 30 seconds in cucumber, 60 to 70 seconds in sunflower), the growth rate declines in an exponential fashion to a lower rate, with a half-time of 15 to 25 seconds in cucumber and 90 to 150 seconds in sunflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1001–1240 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hypocotyl excision greatly reduces growth-rate sensitivity to blue-light inhibition.

Treatment
Excision of the hypocotyle0
Outcome
sensitivity of the growth rate to blue-light inhibitione0
Direction
reducese0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Excision of the hypocotyl greatly reduces the sensitivity of the growth rate to blue-light inhibition.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1242–1344 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors infer that rapid blue-light growth inhibition probably acts on cell-wall loosening or cell turgor.

Outcome
cell enlargemente0
Qualifier
biochemical process which loosens cell walls or on cell turgore0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“the blue-light photoreceptor cannot affect cell enlargement by altering the supply of growth hormone or the sensitivity to hormones but probably operates more directly either on the biochemical process which loosens cell walls or on cell turgor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1376–1620 · show in text ↑

radiation · growth · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

19 papers: 8 positive, 11 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.