Paper · 2003 · Small Fruits Review

Comparison of Fungicide, Leaf Removal and Gibberellic Acid on Development of Grape Clusters and Botrytis Bunch Rot of ‘Vignoles’ and ‘Pinot Gris’

D. C. Ferree; M. A. Ellis; S. J. McArtney; et al.

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
12
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Abstract 'Vignoles' and ‘Pinot Gris’ grapes, which have compact clusters, were treated with iprodione (Rovral) fungicide, selective leaf removal and gibberellic acid (GA3) over several years to determine the influence on Botrytis bunch rot infection, cluster development, yield and quality. Treatment of individual clusters with GA3 tended to increase cluster weight and length, and decrease berries with rot, but differences were not always significant. The fungicide iprodione provided good control of Botrytis bunch rot and leaf removal reduced incidence approximately 50% of that achieved by the fungicide. Most years yield was not affected by GA3 application at bloom, but in 1999 GA3 reduced the yield of ‘Vignoles’ 37% and ‘Pinot Gris’ 40%. None of the treatments affected juice quality. Changing cluster architecture with GA3 or exposing clusters by leaf removal were sufficient alone to control bunch rot on susceptible cultivars under humid Midwest conditions, and should be integrated with a fungicide program.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GA3 treatment of individual clusters tended to increase cluster weight and length, with differences not always significant.

Taxon
grapese0
Treatment
Treatment of individual clusters with GA3e1
Outcome
cluster weight and lengthe1
Direction
increasee1
Qualifier
differences were not always significante1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“grapes, which have compact clusters, were treated with iprodione (Rovral) fungicide”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 37–120 · show in text ↑
e1

“Treatment of individual clusters with GA3 tended to increase cluster weight and length, and decrease berries with rot, but differences were not always significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 291–453 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GA3 treatment of individual clusters tended to decrease berries with rot.

Taxon
grapese0
Treatment
Treatment of individual clusters with GA3e1
Outcome
berries with rote1
Direction
decreasee1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“grapes, which have compact clusters, were treated with iprodione (Rovral) fungicide”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 37–120 · show in text ↑
e1

“Treatment of individual clusters with GA3 tended to increase cluster weight and length, and decrease berries with rot, but differences were not always significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 291–453 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Iprodione fungicide provided good control of Botrytis bunch rot.

Taxon
grapese0
Treatment
iprodionee2
Interactor
BotrytisBotrytise2pathogen
Outcome
control of Botrytis bunch rote2
Qualifier
goode2

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Botrytis
Botrytis · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Rasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“grapes, which have compact clusters, were treated with iprodione (Rovral) fungicide”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 37–120 · show in text ↑
e2

“The fungicide iprodione provided good control of Botrytis bunch rot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 455–522 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf removal reduced incidence to approximately 50% of that achieved by the fungicide.

Taxon
grapese0
Treatment
leaf removale3
Outcome
incidencee3
Direction
reducede3
Value
50%e3
Comparator
the fungicidee3

Verbatim

e0

“grapes, which have compact clusters, were treated with iprodione (Rovral) fungicide”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 37–120 · show in text ↑
e3

“leaf removal reduced incidence approximately 50% of that achieved by the fungicide”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 527–609 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GA3 application at bloom did not affect yield in most years.

Taxon
grapese0
Treatment
GA3 application at bloome4
Outcome
yielde4
Direction
no_changeinferrede4
Qualifier
Most yearse4

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“grapes, which have compact clusters, were treated with iprodione (Rovral) fungicide”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 37–120 · show in text ↑
e4

“Most years yield was not affected by GA3 application at bloom”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 611–672 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 1999 GA3 reduced the yield of Vignoles by 37%.

Taxon
grapese0
Material
Vignolese5
Treatment
GA3e5
Outcome
yielde5
Direction
reducede5
Value
37%e5
Setting
in 1999e5

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“grapes, which have compact clusters, were treated with iprodione (Rovral) fungicide”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 37–120 · show in text ↑
e5

“in 1999 GA3 reduced the yield of ‘Vignoles’ 37% and ‘Pinot Gris’ 40%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 678–746 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 1999 GA3 reduced the yield of Pinot Gris by 40%.

Taxon
grapese0
Material
Pinot Grise5
Treatment
GA3e5
Outcome
yielde5
Direction
reducede5
Value
40%e5
Setting
in 1999e5

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“grapes, which have compact clusters, were treated with iprodione (Rovral) fungicide”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 37–120 · show in text ↑
e5

“in 1999 GA3 reduced the yield of ‘Vignoles’ 37% and ‘Pinot Gris’ 40%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 678–746 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

None of the treatments affected juice quality.

Taxon
grapese0
Treatment
the treatmentse6
Outcome
juice qualitye6
Direction
no_changeinferrede6

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“grapes, which have compact clusters, were treated with iprodione (Rovral) fungicide”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 37–120 · show in text ↑
e6

“None of the treatments affected juice quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 748–793 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Exposing clusters by leaf removal alone was sufficient to control bunch rot on susceptible cultivars under humid Midwest conditions.

Taxon
grapese0
Treatment
exposing clusters by leaf removale7
Outcome
control bunch rote7
Qualifier
susceptible cultivarse7
Setting
humid Midwest conditionse7

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“grapes, which have compact clusters, were treated with iprodione (Rovral) fungicide”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 37–120 · show in text ↑
e7

“Changing cluster architecture with GA3 or exposing clusters by leaf removal were sufficient alone to control bunch rot on susceptible cultivars under humid Midwest conditions, and should be integrated with a fungicide program”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 795–1020 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf removal or GA3 cluster treatment should be integrated with a fungicide program.

Taxon
grapese0
Outcome
integrated with a fungicide programe7

Verbatim

e0

“grapes, which have compact clusters, were treated with iprodione (Rovral) fungicide”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 37–120 · show in text ↑
e7

“Changing cluster architecture with GA3 or exposing clusters by leaf removal were sufficient alone to control bunch rot on susceptible cultivars under humid Midwest conditions, and should be integrated with a fungicide program”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 795–1020 · show in text ↑

Gibberellic acid · yield · VitisResults differ

47 papers: 39 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 39 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

43 papers more in this group

See all 47 papers →

cluster · disease · VitisPositive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
See all 3 papers →

Gibberellic acid · disease · VitisPositive and negative results

9 papers: 7 positive, 2 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

iprodione · Botrytis · VitisResults agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

pruning · disease · VitisPositive and negative results

25 papers: 21 positive, 4 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.