Paper · 1995 · HortScience

Do Chemical Treatments that Influence Inflorescence Necrosis Severity affect Grape Flower Cluster NH4+?

Glen L. Creasy; Patrick J. Breen

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A fruit-set disorder of grape, called Inflorescence Necrosis (IN), causes death of flower cluster tissue near bloom. Various chemical treatments have been reported to increase IN severity. Separate studies show that high flower cluster NH 4+ is related to naturally occurring IN. We designed a field trial to determine if treatments thought to influence IN severity also affect flower cluster NH 4+ . One week before first bloom, flower clusters were dipped in solutions of either methionine sulfoximine (MSO, an inhibitor of NH 4+ assimilation), α-keto glutarate, (NH 4 ) 2 HPO 4 , KNO 3 , NAA, GA, or an emulsion solution reported to increase transpiration. Also, ethephon was sprayed on whole vines 1 week before first bloom. Flower clusters were collected 5 days after treatment. MSO increased tissue [NH 4+ ] by almost 2-fold over that of controls. NAA and GA reduced [NH 4+ ] a small amount, possibly due to their slightly higher fresh weights. Other dip treatments did not affect [NH 4+ ]. Despite high [NH 4+ ] in MSO treated clusters, there were no visual differences in IN between treatments. Ethephon increased cluster [NH 4+ ] 20% over that of controls, but caused more severe IN. These data show that flower cluster [NH 4+ ] is not always coupled with IN symptoms.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MSO nearly doubled flower-cluster ammonium relative to controls.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
MSOe0
Outcome
tissue [NH 4+ ]e0
Direction
increasede0
Value
almost 2-folde0
Comparator
controlse0

Verbatim

e0

“MSO increased tissue [NH 4+ ] by almost 2-fold over that of controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 784–852 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NAA slightly reduced flower-cluster ammonium.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
NAAe0
Outcome
[NH 4+ ]e0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
a small amounte0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“NAA and GA reduced [NH 4+ ] a small amount”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 854–896 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GA slightly reduced flower-cluster ammonium.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
GAe0
Outcome
[NH 4+ ]e0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
a small amounte0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“NAA and GA reduced [NH 4+ ] a small amount”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 854–896 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Other dip treatments did not affect flower-cluster ammonium.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
Other dip treatmentse0
Outcome
[NH 4+ ]e0
Direction
did not affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Other dip treatments did not affect [NH 4+ ]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 951–995 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MSO-treated clusters showed no visible difference in inflorescence necrosis among treatments.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
MSO treated clusterse0
Outcome
INe0
Direction
no visual differencese0
Comparator
between treatmentse0

Verbatim

e0

“Despite high [NH 4+ ] in MSO treated clusters, there were no visual differences in IN between treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 997–1101 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethephon increased flower-cluster ammonium by 20% relative to controls.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
Ethephone0
Outcome
cluster [NH 4+ ]e0
Direction
increasede0
Value
20%e0
Comparator
controlse0

Verbatim

e0

“Ethephon increased cluster [NH 4+ ] 20% over that of controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1103–1164 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethephon caused more severe inflorescence necrosis.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
Ethephone0
Outcome
INe0
Direction
more severee0
Comparator
controlse0

Verbatim

e0

“Ethephon increased cluster [NH 4+ ] 20% over that of controls, but caused more severe IN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1103–1191 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–82 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flower-cluster ammonium was not always coupled to inflorescence-necrosis symptoms.

Taxon
grapet0
Outcome
IN symptomse0
Qualifier
flower cluster [NH 4+ ] is not always couplede0

Verbatim

e0

“flower cluster [NH 4+ ] is not always coupled with IN symptoms”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1214–1276 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–82 · show in text ↑

(2-chloroethyl)phosphonic acid · molecular: metabolites · VitisResults differ

5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

cluster · disease · VitisPositive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

(2-chloroethyl)phosphonic acid · disease · VitisResults agree

4 papers: 0 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.