Paper · 1991 · American Journal of Enology and Viticulture

Environmental and Hormonal Effects on Development of Early Bunch Stem Necrosis

D. I. Jackson

12
claims
27
verbatim quotes
28
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Factors influencing the development of early bunch stem necrosis (EBSN) were studied using fruiting cuttings of Riesling and Cabernet Sauvignon grapes. Riesling shaded to 10%. 20%, 50%, and 100% full greenhouse light developed more EBSN than unshaded control, and reducing leaf area of Cabernet Sauvignon held at 50% full greenhouse light further enhanced EBSN development. Reducing irrigation frequency without inducing wilt or leaf fall also increased the disorder in Cabernet Sauvignon. Similarly, reducing nutrient levels to 20% of control promoted EBSN in the same cultivar, and, in a parallel experiment, sprays of foliar nutrients pre-bloom reduced the disorder. Field experiments with Gewürztraminer showed that ethephon and chlormequat applied pre-bloom increased berry set. Only the ethephon treatment increased EBSN. Neither influenced final yield. The level of ethephon-induced EBSN was reduced if bunches were avoided during spraying. These results suggest the disorder is exacerbated by conditions inducing stress and may be mediated by endogenous or exogenous ethylene. They also indicate practical ways to reduce EBSN

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shading increased early bunch stem necrosis in Riesling grapes.

Taxon
grapese1
Material
Rieslinge0
Treatment
shaded to 10%. 20%, 50%, and 100% full greenhouse lighte0
Outcome
EBSNe0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
unshaded controle0

Verbatim

e0

“Riesling shaded to 10%. 20%, 50%, and 100% full greenhouse light developed more EBSN than unshaded control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 152–258 · show in text ↑
e1

“Riesling and Cabernet Sauvignon grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 112–150 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reducing leaf area increased EBSN in Cabernet Sauvignon at half greenhouse light.

Taxon
grapese1
Material
Cabernet Sauvignone0
Treatment
reducing leaf areae0
Outcome
EBSN developmente0
Direction
enhancede0
Qualifier
50% full greenhouse lighte0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“reducing leaf area of Cabernet Sauvignon held at 50% full greenhouse light further enhanced EBSN development”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 264–372 · show in text ↑
e1

“Riesling and Cabernet Sauvignon grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 112–150 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Less frequent irrigation increased EBSN in Cabernet Sauvignon without wilting or leaf fall.

Taxon
grapese1
Material
Cabernet Sauvignone0
Treatment
Reducing irrigation frequencye0
Outcome
the disordere0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
without inducing wilt or leaf falle0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Reducing irrigation frequency without inducing wilt or leaf fall also increased the disorder in Cabernet Sauvignon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 374–488 · show in text ↑
e1

“Riesling and Cabernet Sauvignon grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 112–150 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reducing nutrients to 20% of control promoted EBSN.

Taxon
grapese1
Material
Cabernet Sauvignone1
Treatment
reducing nutrient levels to 20% of controle0
Outcome
EBSNe0
Direction
promotede0
Comparator
controle0

Verbatim

e0

“reducing nutrient levels to 20% of control promoted EBSN in the same cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 501–578 · show in text ↑
e1

“Riesling and Cabernet Sauvignon grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 112–150 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Prebloom foliar nutrients reduced EBSN.

Taxon
grapese1
Treatment
sprays of foliar nutrients pre-bloome0
Outcome
the disordere0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“sprays of foliar nutrients pre-bloom reduced the disorder”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 611–668 · show in text ↑
e1

“Riesling and Cabernet Sauvignon grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 112–150 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Prebloom ethephon increased berry set in Gewürztraminer.

Taxon
grapese1
Material
Gewürztraminere0
Treatment
ethephone0
Outcome
berry sete0
Direction
increasede0
Setting
Field experimentse0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Field experiments with Gewürztraminer showed that ethephon and chlormequat applied pre-bloom increased berry set”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 670–782 · show in text ↑
e1

“Riesling and Cabernet Sauvignon grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 112–150 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Prebloom chlormequat increased berry set in Gewürztraminer.

Taxon
grapese1
Material
Gewürztraminere0
Treatment
chlormequate0
Outcome
berry sete0
Direction
increasede0
Setting
Field experimentse0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Field experiments with Gewürztraminer showed that ethephon and chlormequat applied pre-bloom increased berry set”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 670–782 · show in text ↑
e1

“Riesling and Cabernet Sauvignon grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 112–150 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethephon increased EBSN in Gewürztraminer.

Taxon
grapese2
Material
Gewürztraminere1
Treatment
ethephon treatmente0
Outcome
EBSNe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Only the ethephon treatment increased EBSN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 784–826 · show in text ↑
e1

“Field experiments with Gewürztraminer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 670–707 · show in text ↑
e2

“Riesling and Cabernet Sauvignon grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 112–150 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethephon did not influence final yield.

Taxon
grapese2
Material
Gewürztraminere1
Treatment
ethephon treatmente0
Outcome
final yielde0
Direction
Neither influencede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Only the ethephon treatment increased EBSN. Neither influenced final yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 784–858 · show in text ↑
e1

“Field experiments with Gewürztraminer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 670–707 · show in text ↑
e2

“Riesling and Cabernet Sauvignon grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 112–150 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlormequat did not influence final yield.

Taxon
grapese2
Material
Gewürztraminere1
Treatment
chlormequate0
Outcome
final yielde0
Direction
Neither influencede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“ethephon and chlormequat applied pre-bloom increased berry set. Only the ethephon treatment increased EBSN. Neither influenced final yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 720–858 · show in text ↑
e1

“Field experiments with Gewürztraminer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 670–707 · show in text ↑
e2

“Riesling and Cabernet Sauvignon grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 112–150 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Avoiding bunches during spraying reduced ethephon-induced EBSN.

Taxon
grapese1
Treatment
bunches were avoided during sprayinge0
Outcome
ethephon-induced EBSNe0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The level of ethephon-induced EBSN was reduced if bunches were avoided during spraying”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 860–946 · show in text ↑
e1

“Riesling and Cabernet Sauvignon grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 112–150 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors infer that stress exacerbates EBSN and ethylene may mediate it.

Taxon
grapese1
Outcome
the disordere0
Qualifier
conditions inducing stress and may be mediated by endogenous or exogenous ethylenee0

Verbatim

e0

“the disorder is exacerbated by conditions inducing stress and may be mediated by endogenous or exogenous ethylene”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 970–1083 · show in text ↑
e1

“Riesling and Cabernet Sauvignon grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 112–150 · show in text ↑

chlormequat chloride · yield · VitisResults differ

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

(2-chloroethyl)phosphonic acid · yield · VitisResults differ

14 papers: 10 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

(2-chloroethyl)phosphonic acid · disease · VitisResults agree

4 papers: 0 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

light · disease · VitisPositive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

application · disease · VitisPositive and negative results

56 papers: 50 positive, 6 negative or no effect

49 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

52 papers more in this group

See all 56 papers →

shade · disease · VitisResults agree

3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. no effect
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.