Paper · 1992 · Indian Journal of Horticulture

Effect of incubation light intensity, antioxidants and phenol binding agents on in vitro oxidative browning on culture initiation of grapevine

Monika Dalal; Bhawana Sharma; Charanjit Kaur Sahni

3
claims
6
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Explants of ‘Pusa Seedless’ and ‘Beauty Seedless’ cvs. of field grown mature grapevine were cultured on MS semi-solid medium supplemented with 5 μM 6-benzylaminopurine. The cultured explants were initially exposed to varying levels of light intensity (0 to 3500 lux) with a duration ranging from 24 to 72 hours followed by continuous exposure to light intensity of 3500 lux under 16 h/8 h light dark photoperiod. Initial exposure to complete darkness for 72 h resulted in slight decrease in oxidative browning with a corresponding increase in explant survival. Various antioxidants and phenol binding agents had either deleterious or no influence on explants and some of the treatments had at best marginal influence in controlling oxidative browning.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Initial darkness for 72 hours slightly decreased oxidative browning of cultured grapevine explants.

Taxon
grapevineVitist0
Treatment
complete darkness for 72 he0
Outcome
oxidative browninge0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Initial exposure to complete darkness for 72 h resulted in slight decrease in oxidative browning”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 413–509 · show in text ↑
t0

“grapevine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 133–142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Initial darkness for 72 hours increased grapevine explant survival.

Taxon
grapevineVitist0
Treatment
complete darkness for 72 he0
Outcome
explant survivale0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Initial exposure to complete darkness for 72 h resulted in slight decrease in oxidative browning with a corresponding increase in explant survival.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 413–560 · show in text ↑
t0

“grapevine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 133–142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Antioxidants and phenol binding agents generally had deleterious or no influence on grapevine explants, with at most marginal browning control.

Taxon
grapevineVitist0
Treatment
Various antioxidants and phenol binding agentse0
Outcome
oxidative browninge0
Direction
marginal influencee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Various antioxidants and phenol binding agents had either deleterious or no influence on explants and some of the treatments had at best marginal influence in controlling oxidative browning.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 561–751 · show in text ↑
t0

“grapevine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 133–142 · show in text ↑

light · disease · VitisPositive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

light · growth · VitisPositive and negative results

23 papers: 15 positive, 8 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.