Paper · 2021 · International Journal of Environment and Climate Change

Influence of Plant Growth Regulators to Improve the Colour and Sugar Content of Grapes (Vitis vinifera L.). cv. Red Globe

S. Nanthakumar; V. Manju; V. Ashok Kumar

6
claims
9
verbatim quotes
3
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Studies on Effect of plant growth regulators to improve the colour and sugar content of Grapes” (Vitis vinifera L.).cv. Red Globe was conducted in the field of a progressive grape grower at Kaalampalyam (10 O 58’49.17” N and 76 O 55’ 15. 81”E and elevation of 1352 ft from MSL) near Perur area of Coimbatore district in Tamil Nadu. The experiment was laid out in a randomized Block design with 7 treatments and each treatment was replicated four times. The data recorded on various parameters viz., vegetative growth, flowering, fruit yield, Quality etc., were statistically analysed. Significant differences were observed among the growth regulators on various vegetative growth parameters in Grapes (Vitis vinifera L.). cv. Red Globe. Among all the treatments, number of bunches per vine was significantly higher when sprayed with ethephon 200ppm (T4) compared to other treatments. (6.53 cm), the berry size and berry weight of the grapes were found to be maximum in the bunches treated with CCC 500ppm (T2) (6.57 g), There was no impact on the number of seeds by the treatments. The ethephon 200ppm (T4) treatment exhibited superior quality in terms of juice content, total sugars and colour value.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Growth regulators differed significantly in vegetative growth effects.

Taxon
Grapese0
Material
Red Globee0
Treatment
growth regulatorse0
Outcome
vegetative growth parameterse0
Comparator
among the growth regulatorse0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Significant differences were observed among the growth regulators on various vegetative growth parameters in Grapes (Vitis vinifera L.). cv. Red Globe”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 585–735 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethephon 200ppm gave significantly more bunches per vine than other treatments.

Taxon
Grapest0
Treatment
ethephon 200ppme0
Outcome
number of bunches per vinee0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Verbatim

e0

“number of bunches per vine was significantly higher when sprayed with ethephon 200ppm (T4) compared to other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 763–882 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CCC 500ppm gave the maximum berry size, reported as 6.53 cm.

Taxon
grapese0
Treatment
CCC 500ppme0
Outcome
berry sizee0
Direction
maximume0
Value
6.53 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“(6.53 cm), the berry size and berry weight of the grapes were found to be maximum in the bunches treated with CCC 500ppm (T2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 884–1009 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CCC 500ppm gave the maximum berry weight, 6.57 g.

Taxon
grapese0
Treatment
CCC 500ppme0
Outcome
berry weighte0
Direction
maximume0
Value
6.57 ge0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“berry size and berry weight of the grapes were found to be maximum in the bunches treated with CCC 500ppm (T2) (6.57 g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 899–1018 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatments had no impact on grape seed number.

Taxon
Grapest0
Treatment
treatmentse0
Outcome
number of seedse0
Direction
no impacte0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“There was no impact on the number of seeds by the treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1020–1080 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethephon 200ppm gave superior juice content, total sugars, and colour value.

Taxon
Grapest0
Treatment
ethephon 200ppme0
Outcome
juice content, total sugars and colour valuee0
Direction
superiore0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“ethephon 200ppm (T4) treatment exhibited superior quality in terms of juice content, total sugars and colour value”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1086–1200 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–86 · show in text ↑

chlormequat chloride · yield · VitisResults differ

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

(2-chloroethyl)phosphonic acid · quality: sugar starch · VitisResults differ

12 papers: 7 positive, 5 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

(2-chloroethyl)phosphonic acid · yield · VitisResults differ

14 papers: 10 positive, 4 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.