(2-chloroethyl)phosphonic acid · Quality: sugar starch · Vitis
16 claims from these papers; 2 citations between them.
Papers whose results differ, checked claim by claim 3
3 pairs of papers on this question report results that differ: an effect in one paper, the opposite effect or no effect in the other. Two model reviewers reading both claims accepted each pair.
- Response of `Reliance' Table Grapes to Canopy Management and Ethephon Application (1994)
decreaseEthephon generally reduced juice soluble solids.
Effect of phosphonic acid (2-chloroethyl) on physical and chemical characteristics of trakya ilkeren and red globe table grapes (Vitis vinifera L.) (2008)increaseEthephon applications increased grape total soluble solids.
The records name no dose, test system or situation that separates the two claims.Compare the two papers → - Effect of ethrel on ripening and quality of Thompson seedless Grapes (Vitis vinifera L.) (1996)
decreaseEthrel at 600 ppm at veraison reduced grape berry acidity.
Ethephon As a Potential Abscission Agent for Table Grapes: Effects on Pre-Harvest Abscission, Fruit Quality, and Residue (2016)no changeEthephon did not affect Crimson Seedless soluble solids, acidity or firmness.
The records name no dose, test system or situation that separates the two claims.Compare the two papers → - Effect of ethephon with calcium acetate on maturation of 'campbell' early grapes (1983)
decreaseEthephon at 1,000ppm 20 days before veraison decreased total acid, total sugars and total soluble solids.
Effect of phosphonic acid (2-chloroethyl) on physical and chemical characteristics of trakya ilkeren and red globe table grapes (Vitis vinifera L.) (2008)increaseEthephon applications increased grape total soluble solids.
The records name no dose, test system or situation that separates the two claims.Compare the two papers →
How these papers cite each other
2 citations between these papers: 2 on the same side, 0 across the two sides.
- Positive result
- Negative result or no effect
- Citation, pointing to the cited paper
- Citation across the two sides
- Larger circle: more citations overall
Years run left to right. Citations come from the papers’ OpenAlex reference lists. Hover a paper to bring forward its citations; click it to open the paper.
Papers reporting a positive result 7
Effect of ethrel on ripening and quality of Thompson seedless Grapes (Vitis vinifera L.) · 1996
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
Papers reporting a negative result or no effect 5
- no effect
Effect of ethephon with calcium acetate on maturation of 'campbell' early grapes · 1983
- negative
- negative
Response of `Reliance' Table Grapes to Canopy Management and Ethephon Application · 1994
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
A paper is on the positive side when any of its claims here is positive. Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.
(2-chloroethyl)phosphonic acid on Vitis against other targets
(2-chloroethyl)phosphonic acid · quality: sugar starch on other organisms
- Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)
- Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)
- Prunus persica (peach)
- Malus domestica (apple)
- Mangifera indica (mango)
- Ananas comosus (pineapple)
- Cucumis melo (muskmelon)
- Prunus domestica (plum)
- Fragaria ×ananassa (strawberry)
- Punica granatum (pomegranate)
- Zea mays (maize)
- Solanum muricatum (pepino dulce)