Paper · 2004 · Agronomy Journal

Nitrogen Fertilization and Rotation Effects on No‐Till Dryland Wheat Production

Ardell D. Halvorson; David C. Nielsen; Curtis A. Reule

12
claims
23
verbatim quotes
90
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

No‐till (NT) production systems, especially winter wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.)‐summer crop‐fallow, have increased in the central Great Plains, but few N fertility studies have been conducted with these systems. Therefore, winter wheat (W) response to N fertilization in two NT dryland crop rotations, wheat‐corn ( Zea mays L.)‐fallow (WCF) and wheat‐sorghum ( Sorghum bicolor L.)‐fallow (WSF), on a Platner loam (fine, smectitic, mesic Aridic Paleustoll) was evaluated for 9 yr. Five N rates, 0, 28, 56, 84, and 112 kg N ha −1 , were applied to each rotation crop. Wheat biomass and grain yield response to N fertilization varied with year but not with crop rotation, increasing with N application each year, with maximum yields being obtained with 84 kg N ha −1 over all years. Based on grain N removal, N fertilizer use efficiency (NFUE) varied with N rate and year, averaging 86, 69, 56, and 46% for the 28, 56, 84, and 112 kg ha −1 N rates, respectively. Grain protein increased with increasing N rate. Precipitation use efficiency (PUE) increased with N addition, leveling off above 56 kg N ha −1 . A soil plus fertilizer N level of 124 to 156 kg N ha −1 was sufficient to optimize winter wheat yields in most years in both rotations. Application of more than 84 kg N ha −1 on this Platner loam soil, with a gravel layer below 120 cm soil depth, would more than likely increase the amount of NO 3 ‐N available for leaching and ground water contamination. Wheat growers in the central Great Plains need to apply N to optimize dryland wheat yields and improve grain quality, but need to avoid over‐fertilization with N to minimize NO 3 ‐N leaching potential.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat biomass rose with N application each year and did not vary by rotation.

Treatment
N applicatione0
Outcome
biomasse0
Direction
increasinge0
Qualifier
each yeare0
Comparator
crop rotatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat biomass and grain yield response to N fertilization varied with year but not with crop rotation, increasing with N application each year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 567–709 · show in text ↑
e1

“winter wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 44–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat grain yield rose with N application each year and did not vary by rotation.

Treatment
N applicatione0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasinge0
Qualifier
each yeare0
Comparator
crop rotatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat biomass and grain yield response to N fertilization varied with year but not with crop rotation, increasing with N application each year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 567–709 · show in text ↑
e1

“winter wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 44–80 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maximum wheat yield occurred at 84 kg N ha −1 across years.

Treatment
84 kg N ha −1e0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
maximume0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maximum yields being obtained with 84 kg N ha −1 over all years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 716–779 · show in text ↑
e1

“winter wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 44–80 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NFUE averaged 86% at 28 kg ha −1 N.

Treatment
28e0
Outcome
N fertilizer use efficiency (NFUE)e0
Value
86e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“N fertilizer use efficiency (NFUE) varied with N rate and year, averaging 86, 69, 56, and 46% for the 28, 56, 84, and 112 kg ha −1 N rates, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 807–960 · show in text ↑
e1

“winter wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 44–80 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NFUE averaged 69% at 56 kg ha −1 N.

Treatment
56e0
Outcome
N fertilizer use efficiency (NFUE)e0
Value
69e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“N fertilizer use efficiency (NFUE) varied with N rate and year, averaging 86, 69, 56, and 46% for the 28, 56, 84, and 112 kg ha −1 N rates, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 807–960 · show in text ↑
e1

“winter wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 44–80 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NFUE averaged 56% at 84 kg ha −1 N.

Treatment
84e0
Outcome
N fertilizer use efficiency (NFUE)e0
Value
56e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“N fertilizer use efficiency (NFUE) varied with N rate and year, averaging 86, 69, 56, and 46% for the 28, 56, 84, and 112 kg ha −1 N rates, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 807–960 · show in text ↑
e1

“winter wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 44–80 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NFUE averaged 46% at 112 kg ha −1 N.

Treatment
112e0
Outcome
N fertilizer use efficiency (NFUE)e0
Value
46%e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“N fertilizer use efficiency (NFUE) varied with N rate and year, averaging 86, 69, 56, and 46% for the 28, 56, 84, and 112 kg ha −1 N rates, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 807–960 · show in text ↑
e1

“winter wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 44–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain protein rose with increasing N rate.

Treatment
increasing N ratee0
Outcome
Grain proteine0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain protein increased with increasing N rate.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 961–1008 · show in text ↑
e1

“winter wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 44–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Precipitation use efficiency rose with N addition and levelled above 56 kg N ha −1.

Treatment
N additione0
Outcome
Precipitation use efficiency (PUE)e0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
above 56 kg N ha −1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Precipitation use efficiency (PUE) increased with N addition, leveling off above 56 kg N ha −1 .”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1009–1105 · show in text ↑
e1

“winter wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 44–80 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil plus fertilizer N of 124 to 156 kg N ha −1 optimized wheat yield in most years.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
124 to 156 kg N ha −1e0
Outcome
winter wheat yieldse0
Direction
optimizee0
Qualifier
most years in both rotationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A soil plus fertilizer N level of 124 to 156 kg N ha −1 was sufficient to optimize winter wheat yields in most years in both rotations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1106–1241 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors warn that more than 84 kg N ha −1 could increase nitrate available for leaching.

Treatment
more than 84 kg N ha −1e0
Outcome
NO 3 ‐N available for leaching and ground water contaminatione0
Setting
Platner loam soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of more than 84 kg N ha −1 on this Platner loam soil, with a gravel layer below 120 cm soil depth, would more than likely increase the amount of NO 3 ‐N available for leaching and ground water contamination.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1242–1461 · show in text ↑
e1

“winter wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 44–80 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors advise growers to apply enough N to optimize yield and grain quality while avoiding excess N.

Outcome
avoid over‐fertilization with Ne0
Setting
central Great Plainse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat growers in the central Great Plains need to apply N to optimize dryland wheat yields and improve grain quality, but need to avoid over‐fertilization with N to minimize NO 3 ‐N leaching potential.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1462–1663 · show in text ↑
e1

“winter wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 44–80 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · nutrient: efficiency · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

174 papers: 127 positive, 47 negative or no effect

126 papers in the same direction as this paper · 45 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

170 papers more in this group

See all 174 papers →

nitrogen · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

454 papers: 400 positive, 54 negative or no effect

399 papers in the same direction as this paper · 47 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

450 papers more in this group

See all 454 papers →

nitrogen · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

551 papers: 426 positive, 125 negative or no effect

425 papers in the same direction as this paper · 116 in the opposite direction · 9 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

547 papers more in this group

See all 551 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2,061 papers: 1,737 positive, 324 negative or no effect

1,736 papers in the same direction as this paper · 285 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

2,057 papers more in this group

See all 2,061 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.