Paper · 1975 · Soil Science

INTERRELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SULFUR AND IRON IN THE PREVENTION OF IRON CHLOROSIS IN COWPEA

K. N. BANSAL; H. G. SINGH

9
claims
17
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Results of a field experiment comprising soil application of elemental sulfur, ferrous sulfate, and gypsum, along with a control and foliar sprays of 0.1 percent H2SO4, FeSO4, sequestrene 138-Fe, MnSO4, and ZnSO4 along with no spray showed that soil application of 250 kg/ha of elemental sulfur and foliar sprays of H2SO4 and FeSO4 increased cowpea yields by 38.0, 32.6, and 33.4 percent, respectively. The increase in grain yield of cowpea was associated with the increase in leaf contents of sulfur, nitrogen, and a, b, and total chlorophyll. Soil application of gypsum or FeSO4 was only 82 percent as effective as elemental sulfur. The results show that chlorosis in cowpea does not represent any deficiency of iron or other micronutrient, and that it is on account of low supply of active sulfur. Since yield increases with soil application of elemental sulfur and foliage application of 0.1 percent H2SO4 or FeSO4 are of the same magnitude, an application of H2SO4 is recommended to prevent chlorosis and increase crop yield of cowpea as the treatment is almost costless. The beneficial results of FeSO4, MnSO4, ZnSO4, etc., reported in the past seem to be on account of inadvertent supply of sulfur and/or low pH of salt solutions which jointly increase physiological availability of iron at the site of biosynthesis of chlorophyll.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil application of 250 kg/ha elemental sulfur increased cowpea yield by 38.0 percent relative to control.

Treatment
soil application of 250 kg/ha of elemental sulfure3
Outcome
cowpea yieldse3
Direction
increasede3
Value
38.0e3
Comparator
controle2
Setting
field experimente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Results of a field experiment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–29 · show in text ↑
e2

“along with a control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 108–128 · show in text ↑
e3

“soil application of 250 kg/ha of elemental sulfur and foliar sprays of H2SO4 and FeSO4 increased cowpea yields by 38.0, 32.6, and 33.4 percent, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 245–401 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar spray of 0.1 percent H2SO4 increased cowpea yield by 32.6 percent relative to control.

Treatment
foliar sprays of H2SO4e3
Outcome
cowpea yieldse3
Direction
increasede3
Value
32.6e3
Comparator
controle2
Setting
field experimente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Results of a field experiment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–29 · show in text ↑
e2

“along with a control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 108–128 · show in text ↑
e3

“soil application of 250 kg/ha of elemental sulfur and foliar sprays of H2SO4 and FeSO4 increased cowpea yields by 38.0, 32.6, and 33.4 percent, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 245–401 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar spray of 0.1 percent FeSO4 increased cowpea yield by 33.4 percent relative to control.

Treatment
FeSO4e3
Outcome
cowpea yieldse3
Direction
increasede3
Value
33.4e3
Comparator
controle2
Setting
field experimente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Results of a field experiment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–29 · show in text ↑
e2

“along with a control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 108–128 · show in text ↑
e3

“soil application of 250 kg/ha of elemental sulfur and foliar sprays of H2SO4 and FeSO4 increased cowpea yields by 38.0, 32.6, and 33.4 percent, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 245–401 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil application of gypsum or FeSO4 was only 82 percent as effective as elemental sulfur.

Treatment
Soil application of gypsum or FeSO4e4
Outcome
effectivee4
Direction
lowerinferrede4
Value
82 percente4
Comparator
elemental sulfure4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“INTERRELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SULFUR AND IRON IN THE PREVENTION OF IRON CHLOROSIS IN COWPEA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–87 · show in text ↑
e4

“Soil application of gypsum or FeSO4 was only 82 percent as effective as elemental sulfur”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 545–633 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cowpea yield increase was associated with increased leaf sulfur and nitrogen contents.

Organ / stage
leafe5
Outcome
leaf contents of sulfur, nitrogene5
Direction
increasee5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“The increase in grain yield of cowpea was associated with the increase in leaf contents of sulfur, nitrogen, and a, b, and total chlorophyll”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 403–543 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cowpea yield increase was associated with increased leaf chlorophyll a, b and total contents.

Organ / stage
leafe5
Outcome
a, b, and total chlorophylle5
Direction
increasee5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“The increase in grain yield of cowpea was associated with the increase in leaf contents of sulfur, nitrogen, and a, b, and total chlorophyll”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 403–543 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorosis in cowpea reflects low supply of active sulfur rather than iron or other micronutrient deficiency.

Compound
active sulfure6
Outcome
chlorosise6
Qualifier
low supplye6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“chlorosis in cowpea does not represent any deficiency of iron or other micronutrient, and that it is on account of low supply of active sulfur”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 657–799 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil-applied elemental sulfur and foliage-applied 0.1 percent H2SO4 or FeSO4 gave yield increases of the same magnitude.

Treatment
soil application of elemental sulfure7
Outcome
yield increasese7
Direction
no_changeinferrede7
Comparator
foliage application of 0.1 percent H2SO4 or FeSO4e7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“INTERRELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SULFUR AND IRON IN THE PREVENTION OF IRON CHLOROSIS IN COWPEA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–87 · show in text ↑
e7

“Since yield increases with soil application of elemental sulfur and foliage application of 0.1 percent H2SO4 or FeSO4 are of the same magnitude”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 801–944 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar application of H2SO4 is recommended to prevent chlorosis and increase cowpea yield because it is almost costless.

Outcome
application of H2SO4e7
Qualifier
almost costlesse7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“an application of H2SO4 is recommended to prevent chlorosis and increase crop yield of cowpea as the treatment is almost costless”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 946–1075 · show in text ↑

sulfuric acid · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

iron(2+) sulfate (anhydrous) · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

application · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

126 papers: 112 positive, 14 negative or no effect

111 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

122 papers more in this group

See all 126 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.