Paper · 2008 · Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science

Response of Wheat Varieties from Semi‐arid Regions of Jordan to Salt Stress

A. H. Abdel‐Ghani

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
34
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract This study was carried out to determine the effects of salinity levels (control, 6, 12 and 18 dS m −1 ) on germination, seedling growth, some agronomic traits and proline accumulation in leaves of nine wheat varieties adapted to semi‐arid areas of Jordan. The tested wheat materials included eight durum wheat varieties (Haurani 27, Acsad 65, Om Rabbeeh, Sham 1, Safra Ma’an, Katma, Al‐Samra and F8) and one bread wheat variety (Diel Harthon). Final germination percentage, shoot and seminal root length, and all growth and yield parameters were significantly (P < 0.05) decreased by increasing salinity level. Proline content was significantly (P < 0.05) increased by increasing salinity. There were significant variety × salt interactions (P < 0.05) on final germination percentage, seminal root length, grain yield and yield‐related traits indicating that the varieties responded to salt differently. Sham 1 did not show any decrease in germination ability at the different salinity levels. Haurani 27, Acsad 65, Al‐Samra and Diel Harthon showed a nonsignificant reduction in germination potential at low and intermediate salt levels. Safra Ma’an and Al‐Samra showed the lowest reduction in seminal root length at low salt level and consequently exhibited the lowest stress susceptibility index ‘S’ values. Grain yield‐based stress susceptibility index ‘S’ indicated that Haurani 27, Acsad 65, Katma, Al‐Samra, F8 and Diel Jardoon were more salt tolerant than Om Rabbeeh, Sham 1 and Safra Ma’an. In conclusion, a similar salt tolerance was observed at different growth stages in Haurani 27, Acsad 65 and Al‐Samra. Consequently, these three varieties could be considered as salt tolerant and accordingly they are suitable for durum wheat improvement. Furthermore, Sham 1 had the highest ability to germinate at high salinity level indicating that it has a genetic potential for salt tolerance, at least at this stage of its life cycle.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing salinity significantly decreased wheat final germination percentage.

Treatment
increasing salinity levele0
Outcome
Final germination percentagee0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Final germination percentage, shoot and seminal root length, and all growth and yield parameters were significantly (P < 0.05) decreased by increasing salinity level.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 453–619 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–27 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing salinity significantly decreased wheat shoot and seminal root length.

Treatment
increasing salinity levele0
Outcome
shoot and seminal root lengthe0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Final germination percentage, shoot and seminal root length, and all growth and yield parameters were significantly (P < 0.05) decreased by increasing salinity level.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 453–619 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–27 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing salinity significantly decreased wheat growth and yield parameters.

Treatment
increasing salinity levele0
Outcome
all growth and yield parameterse0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Final germination percentage, shoot and seminal root length, and all growth and yield parameters were significantly (P < 0.05) decreased by increasing salinity level.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 453–619 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–27 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing salinity significantly increased wheat proline content.

Treatment
increasing salinitye0
Outcome
Proline contente0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Proline content was significantly (P < 0.05) increased by increasing salinity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 620–698 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–27 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Variety and salt significantly interacted for wheat germination, root length, grain yield and yield-related traits.

Treatment
salte0
Outcome
final germination percentage, seminal root length, grain yielde0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There were significant variety × salt interactions (P < 0.05) on final germination percentage, seminal root length, grain yield and yield‐related traits indicating that the varieties responded to salt differently.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 699–912 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–27 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sham 1 germination did not decrease across salinity levels.

Material
Sham 1e0
Outcome
germination abilitye0
Direction
did not show any decreasee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sham 1 did not show any decrease in germination ability at the different salinity levels.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 913–1002 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–27 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Haurani 27, Acsad 65 and Al-Samra were judged salt tolerant across growth stages.

Material
Haurani 27, Acsad 65 and Al‐Samrae0
Outcome
similar salt tolerancee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a similar salt tolerance was observed at different growth stages in Haurani 27, Acsad 65 and Al‐Samra.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1523–1625 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–27 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend Haurani 27, Acsad 65 and Al-Samra for durum wheat improvement.

Outcome
suitable for durum wheat improvemente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“these three varieties could be considered as salt tolerant and accordingly they are suitable for durum wheat improvement.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1640–1761 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–27 · show in text ↑

salinity · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

227 papers: 30 positive, 197 negative or no effect

196 papers in the same direction as this paper · 30 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

223 papers more in this group

See all 227 papers →

salinity · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

377 papers: 49 positive, 328 negative or no effect

327 papers in the same direction as this paper · 49 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

373 papers more in this group

See all 377 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.