Paper · 2011 · Journal of Agronomy

Corn Yield with Reduction of Insecticidal Sprayings Against Fall Armyworm Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)

M.H.F.A. Dal Pogetto; E.P. Prado; M.J. Gimenes; et al.

4
claims
12
verbatim quotes
20
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The ideal time is more important than amount of insecticidal spraying to adequate the control of Spodoptera frugiperda J.E. Smith (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in corn. This study aimed to evaluate lufenuron sequential sprayings effect and its rotation with other active ingredients on the population, damage caused by S. frugiperda and the impact on corn yield. The experiment was carried out in the field with six treatments: (1) one lufenuron spraying, (2) two lufenuron sprayings, (3) three lufenuron sprayings (4) four lufenuron sprayings, (5) sprayings with spinosad, lufenuron, thiamethoxam+lambdacyhalothrin and deltamethrin (in sequence, at ten days intervals) (6) control treatment. Sprayings started twenty days after the seedling had emerged and then every ten days for a maximum of four sprays. Both caterpillar population (20.9-21.7 larvae/plot) and index of damage (1.2-1.7) observed in corn plants were significantly lower in treated plots compared to control (untreated) (31.7 larvae/plot and index of damage 2.7), regardless of spraying amount. The results showed that multiple insecticide applications to control S. frugiperda do not guarantee higher yields in corn, ranging from 6375.2 to 7650.1 kg ha -1. Only one spraying of lufenuron was enough to prevent significant reduction in corn yield (6749.9 kg ha -1). © 2012 Asian Network for Scientific Information.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Caterpillar population of Spodoptera frugiperda in corn was significantly lower in lufenuron-treated plots than in untreated control plots.

Treatment
lufenuron sequential sprayingse2
Interactor
Spodoptera frugiperdaSpodoptera frugiperdae0pest
Outcome
caterpillar populatione1
Direction
lowere1
Value
20.9-21.7 larvae/plote1
Comparator
control (untreated)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Spodoptera frugiperda
Spodoptera frugiperda · InteractorUSGS Bee Inventory and Monitoring Lab from Beltsville, Maryland, USA · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Corn Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–10 · show in text ↑
e0

“control of Spodoptera frugiperda J.E. Smith (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 86–162 · show in text ↑
e1

“Both caterpillar population (20.9-21.7 larvae/plot) and index of damage (1.2-1.7) observed in corn plants were significantly lower in treated plots compared to control (untreated) (31.7 larvae/plot and index of damage 2.7), regardless of spraying amount”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 803–1056 · show in text ↑
e2

“This study aimed to evaluate lufenuron sequential sprayings effect”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 164–230 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Index of damage by Spodoptera frugiperda in corn was significantly lower in lufenuron-treated plots than in untreated control plots.

Treatment
lufenuron sequential sprayingse2
Interactor
Spodoptera frugiperdaSpodoptera frugiperdae0pest
Outcome
index of damagee1
Direction
lowere1
Value
1.2-1.7e1
Comparator
control (untreated)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Spodoptera frugiperda
Spodoptera frugiperda · InteractorUSGS Bee Inventory and Monitoring Lab from Beltsville, Maryland, USA · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Corn Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–10 · show in text ↑
e0

“control of Spodoptera frugiperda J.E. Smith (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 86–162 · show in text ↑
e1

“Both caterpillar population (20.9-21.7 larvae/plot) and index of damage (1.2-1.7) observed in corn plants were significantly lower in treated plots compared to control (untreated) (31.7 larvae/plot and index of damage 2.7), regardless of spraying amount”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 803–1056 · show in text ↑
e2

“This study aimed to evaluate lufenuron sequential sprayings effect”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 164–230 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Multiple insecticide applications against Spodoptera frugiperda do not guarantee higher corn yields, which ranged from 6375.2 to 7650.1 kg/ha.

Treatment
multiple insecticide applicationse3
Outcome
yieldse3
Direction
do not guarantee highere3
Value
6375.2 to 7650.1 kg ha -1e3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Corn Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–10 · show in text ↑
e3

“The results showed that multiple insecticide applications to control S. frugiperda do not guarantee higher yields in corn, ranging from 6375.2 to 7650.1 kg ha -1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1058–1219 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

One lufenuron spraying was enough to prevent a significant reduction in corn yield (6749.9 kg/ha).

Treatment
one spraying of lufenurone4
Outcome
corn yielde4
Direction
prevent significant reductione4
Value
6749.9 kg ha -1e4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Corn Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–10 · show in text ↑
e4

“Only one spraying of lufenuron was enough to prevent significant reduction in corn yield (6749.9 kg ha -1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1221–1327 · show in text ↑

lufenuron · Spodoptera frugiperda · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

insecticide · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

66 papers: 50 positive, 16 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 50 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

62 papers more in this group

See all 66 papers →

application · Spodoptera frugiperda · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 20 positive, 1 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

application · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

629 papers: 575 positive, 54 negative or no effect

574 papers in the same direction as this paper · 42 in the opposite direction · 12 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

625 papers more in this group

See all 629 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.