Paper · 1989 · PLANT PHYSIOLOGY

Mechanisms of Aluminum Tolerance in Wheat

Susan C. Miyasaka; Leon V. Kochian; Jon E. Shaff; et al.

9
claims
23
verbatim quotes
157
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Control of rhizosphere pH and exclusion of Al by the plasma membrane have been hypothesized as possible mechanisms for Al tolerance. To test primarily the rhizosphere pH hypothesis, wheat cultivars (Triticum aestivum L. ;Atlas 66' and ;Scout'), which differ in Al tolerance, were grown in either complete nutrient solution, or 0.6 millimolar CaSO(4), with and without Al at pH 4.50. A microelectrode system was used to simultaneously measure rhizosphere pH, K(+), and H(+) fluxes, and membrane potentials (E(m)) along the root at various distances from the root apex. In complete nutrient solution, the rhizosphere pH associated with mature root cells (measured 10-40 millimeters from the root apex) of Al-tolerant ;Atlas 66' was slightly higher than that of the bulk solution, whereas roots of Al-sensitive ;Scout' caused a very small decrease in the rhizosphere pH. In CaSO(4) solution, no significant differences in rhizosphere pH were found between wheat cultivars, while differential Al tolerance was still observed, indicating that the rhizosphere pH associated with mature root tissue is not directly involved in the mechanism(s) of differential Al tolerance. In Al-tolerant ;Atlas 66', growth in a CaSO(4) solution with 5 micromolar Al (pH 4.50) had little effect on net K(+) influx, H(+) efflux, and root-cell membrane potential measured in cells of mature root tissue (from 10-40 mm back from apex). However, in Al-sensitive ;Scout', Al treatment caused a dramatic inhibition of K(+) influx and both a moderate reduction of H(+) efflux and depolarization of the membrane potential. These results demonstrate that increased Al tolerance in wheat is associated with the increased ability of the tolerant plant to maintain normal ion fluxes and membrane potentials across the plasmalemma of root cells in the presence of Al.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In complete nutrient solution, rhizosphere pH around mature root cells of the Al-tolerant wheat cultivar Atlas 66 was slightly higher than in the bulk solution.

Material
Atlas 66e2
Organ / stage
mature root cellse2
Outcome
rhizosphere pHe2
Direction
slightly highere2
Comparator
bulk solutione2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“wheat cultivars (Triticum aestivum L. ;Atlas 66' and ;Scout')”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 182–243 · show in text ↑
e2

“the rhizosphere pH associated with mature root cells (measured 10-40 millimeters from the root apex) of Al-tolerant ;Atlas 66' was slightly higher than that of the bulk solution”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 599–776 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Roots of the Al-sensitive wheat cultivar Scout caused a very small decrease in rhizosphere pH in complete nutrient solution.

Material
Scoute2
Organ / stage
rootse2
Outcome
rhizosphere pHe2
Direction
decreasee2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“wheat cultivars (Triticum aestivum L. ;Atlas 66' and ;Scout')”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 182–243 · show in text ↑
e2

“roots of Al-sensitive ;Scout' caused a very small decrease in the rhizosphere pH”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 786–866 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In CaSO4 solution, rhizosphere pH did not differ significantly between the wheat cultivars.

Outcome
rhizosphere pHe2
Direction
no significant differencese2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“wheat cultivars (Triticum aestivum L. ;Atlas 66' and ;Scout')”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 182–243 · show in text ↑
e2

“In CaSO(4) solution, no significant differences in rhizosphere pH were found between wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 868–968 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizosphere pH of mature root tissue is not directly involved in the mechanism of differential Al tolerance in wheat.

Organ / stage
mature root tissuee2
Outcome
mechanism(s) of differential Al tolerancee2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“In CaSO(4) solution, no significant differences in rhizosphere pH were found between wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 868–968 · show in text ↑
e2

“indicating that the rhizosphere pH associated with mature root tissue is not directly involved in the mechanism(s) of differential Al tolerance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1022–1165 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In Al-tolerant Atlas 66 grown with 5 micromolar Al, net K(+) influx, H(+) efflux and root-cell membrane potential in mature root tissue showed little change relative to the solution without Al.

Material
Atlas 66e2
Organ / stage
mature root tissuee2
Treatment
5 micromolar Ale2
Outcome
net K(+) influx, H(+) efflux, and root-cell membrane potentiale2
Direction
little effecte2
Comparator
without Ale3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“wheat cultivars (Triticum aestivum L. ;Atlas 66' and ;Scout')”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 182–243 · show in text ↑
e2

“In Al-tolerant ;Atlas 66', growth in a CaSO(4) solution with 5 micromolar Al (pH 4.50) had little effect on net K(+) influx, H(+) efflux, and root-cell membrane potential measured in cells of mature root tissue”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1167–1377 · show in text ↑
e3

“were grown in either complete nutrient solution, or 0.6 millimolar CaSO(4), with and without Al at pH 4.50”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 275–381 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In Al-sensitive Scout treated with Al, K(+) influx was dramatically inhibited relative to the solution without Al.

Material
Scoute2
Treatment
Al treatmente2
Outcome
K(+) influxe2
Direction
inhibitione2
Qualifier
dramatice2
Comparator
without Ale3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“wheat cultivars (Triticum aestivum L. ;Atlas 66' and ;Scout')”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 182–243 · show in text ↑
e2

“However, in Al-sensitive ;Scout', Al treatment caused a dramatic inhibition of K(+) influx”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1410–1500 · show in text ↑
e3

“were grown in either complete nutrient solution, or 0.6 millimolar CaSO(4), with and without Al at pH 4.50”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 275–381 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In Al-sensitive Scout treated with Al, H(+) efflux was moderately reduced relative to the solution without Al.

Material
Scoute2
Treatment
Al treatmente2
Outcome
H(+) effluxe3
Direction
reductione3
Qualifier
moderatee3
Comparator
without Ale4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“wheat cultivars (Triticum aestivum L. ;Atlas 66' and ;Scout')”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 182–243 · show in text ↑
e2

“However, in Al-sensitive ;Scout', Al treatment caused a dramatic inhibition of K(+) influx”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1410–1500 · show in text ↑
e3

“both a moderate reduction of H(+) efflux and depolarization of the membrane potential”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1505–1590 · show in text ↑
e4

“were grown in either complete nutrient solution, or 0.6 millimolar CaSO(4), with and without Al at pH 4.50”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 275–381 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In Al-sensitive Scout treated with Al, the membrane potential of mature root tissue depolarized relative to the solution without Al.

Material
Scoute2
Treatment
Al treatmente2
Outcome
membrane potentiale3
Direction
depolarizatione3
Comparator
without Ale4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“wheat cultivars (Triticum aestivum L. ;Atlas 66' and ;Scout')”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 182–243 · show in text ↑
e2

“However, in Al-sensitive ;Scout', Al treatment caused a dramatic inhibition of K(+) influx”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1410–1500 · show in text ↑
e3

“both a moderate reduction of H(+) efflux and depolarization of the membrane potential”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1505–1590 · show in text ↑
e4

“were grown in either complete nutrient solution, or 0.6 millimolar CaSO(4), with and without Al at pH 4.50”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 275–381 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increased Al tolerance in wheat is associated with a greater ability of the tolerant plant to maintain normal ion fluxes and membrane potentials in root cells in the presence of Al.

Organ / stage
root cellse1
Outcome
ion fluxes and membrane potentialse1
Direction
increasede1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“These results demonstrate that increased Al tolerance in wheat is associated with the increased ability of the tolerant plant to maintain normal ion fluxes and membrane potentials across the plasmalemma of root cells in the presence of Al”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1592–1830 · show in text ↑