Paper · 1962 · Australian Journal of Agricultural Research

The effect of soil-water stress on the absorption of soil phosphorus by wheat plants

RG Fawcett; JP Quirk

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
20
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A study of the effect of soil-water stress and phosphorus level on the efficiency of phosphorus absorption (micrograms phosphorus per milligram oven-dry root per day) and growth by young wheat plants grown on a lateritic podzolic soil showed that absorption was not affected by increasing soil-water stress, provided the plants were not damaged by wilting. In experiments where the water-stress treatment was imposed for only a few days it was found that the rate of phosphorus absorption was reduced after the plants had been subjected to a period of wilting. The results indicate that available soil phosphorus was derived mainly from fine pores undrained at suctions approaching 15 atm. The concentration of available phosphate in these pores may have been considerably higher than earlier estimates of the phosphate concentration in the soil solution. The absorption of phosphorus increased with increasing soil phosphorus potential for all levels of water stress.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing soil-water stress did not alter phosphorus absorption unless wheat wilted.

Taxon
wheat plantsTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
increasing soil-water stresse0
Outcome
absorptione0
Direction
not affectede0
Qualifier
provided the plants were not damaged by wiltinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“absorption was not affected by increasing soil-water stress, provided the plants were not damaged by wilting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 247–355 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–84 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A period of wilting reduced subsequent phosphorus absorption in wheat.

Taxon
wheat plantsTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
a period of wiltinge0
Outcome
rate of phosphorus absorptione0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the rate of phosphorus absorption was reduced after the plants had been subjected to a period of wilting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 455–559 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–84 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Available soil phosphorus was inferred to come mainly from fine pores at nearly 15 atm suction.

Taxon
wheat plantsTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
available soil phosphoruse0
Qualifier
fine pores undrained at suctions approaching 15 atme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“available soil phosphorus was derived mainly from fine pores undrained at suctions approaching 15 atm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 587–688 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–84 · show in text ↑
Observationhypothesisoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphate concentration in these pores may have exceeded earlier soil solution estimates.

Taxon
wheat plantsTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
concentration of available phosphate in these porese0
Direction
considerably highere0
Comparator
earlier estimates of the phosphate concentration in the soil solutione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The concentration of available phosphate in these pores may have been considerably higher than earlier estimates of the phosphate concentration in the soil solution”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 690–854 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–84 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphorus absorption rose with soil phosphorus potential at every water stress level.

Taxon
wheat plantsTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
increasing soil phosphorus potentiale0
Outcome
absorption of phosphoruse0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
for all levels of water stresse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The absorption of phosphorus increased with increasing soil phosphorus potential for all levels of water stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 856–967 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–84 · show in text ↑

soil water · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 10 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.