Paper · 2009 · Crop and Pasture Science

Fertiliser N and P application on two Vertosols in north-eastern Australia. 3. Grain N uptake and yield by crop/fallow combination, and cumulative grain N removal and fertiliser N recovery in grain

David W. Lester; Colin J. Birch; Chris W. Dowling

13
claims
21
verbatim quotes
11
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The grain N uptake response of an opportunity cropping regime comprising summer and winter cereal and legume crops to fertiliser nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) applications was studied in 2 long-term experiments with contrasting durations of cultivation. At the longer cultivation duration Colonsay site (>44 years at commencement), grain N uptake increased with fertiliser N application in 15 of 17 harvested crops from 1985 to 2003. Grain sorghum on short-fallow consistently responded to applied fertiliser N at higher rates (=80 kg N/ha) than crops grown on long-fallow where either fertiliser at nil or 40 kg N/ha maximised grain N uptake. Winter cereal response to applied N was influenced by fallow length, generally smaller responses in long fallow years, although in-crop rainfall affected this. Short-fallow crops responded up to 40 or 80 kg applied N/ha, while seasonal growing-season rainfall affected the responses of the double-crop winter cereals the most. Responses to applied fertiliser N at the shorter duration cultivation Myling site (9 years at commencement) generally occurred only under high-intensity cropping periods, or in those crops sown following periods of slower potential N mineralisation. Phosphorus fertiliser application influenced grain N uptake at both locations in some years, with winter cereals, legumes, and sorghum sown following long-fallow generally significant. Cumulative grain N uptakes in both experiments were independently influenced by fertiliser N and P treatments, P having an additive effect, increasing grain yield and grain N removed. Recovery efficiency of fertiliser N in grain, derived from cumulative N fertiliser application and grain N uptake, in general declined as amount of fertiliser N applied increased; however, as N supplies became less limiting to yield, P fertiliser generated higher fertiliser N recovery in grain. At Colonsay, RENG from cumulative uptake and removal was =0.48 with fertiliser P application for cumulative fertiliser N input =1340 kg N/ha (˜80 kg fertiliser N/ha.crop).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain N uptake increased with fertilizer N in 15 of 17 crops at Colonsay.

Taxon
cereal and legume cropse1
Treatment
fertiliser N applicatione0
Outcome
grain N uptakee0
Direction
increasede0
Value
15 of 17 harvested cropse0
Setting
Colonsay sitee2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“grain N uptake increased with fertiliser N application in 15 of 17 harvested crops from 1985 to 2003”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 334–434 · show in text ↑
e1

“summer and winter cereal and legume crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 73–114 · show in text ↑
e2

“Colonsay site”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 291–304 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Short-fallow sorghum needed higher N rates for grain N uptake than long-fallow crops.

Taxon
Grain sorghumSorghum bicolore0
Treatment
applied fertiliser N at higher rates (=80 kg N/ha)e0
Outcome
grain N uptakee0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
nil or 40 kg N/hae0
Comparator
crops grown on long-fallowe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain sorghum on short-fallow consistently responded to applied fertiliser N at higher rates (=80 kg N/ha) than crops grown on long-fallow where either fertiliser at nil or 40 kg N/ha maximised grain N uptake.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 436–645 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Winter cereal N responses were smaller after long fallow, subject to rainfall.

Taxon
Winter cereale0
Treatment
applied Ne0
Outcome
response to applied Ne0
Direction
smallere0
Qualifier
in-crop rainfall affected thise0

Verbatim

e0

“Winter cereal response to applied N was influenced by fallow length, generally smaller responses in long fallow years, although in-crop rainfall affected this.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 646–805 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Short-fallow crops responded to up to 40 or 80 kg N/ha.

Taxon
cropse0
Outcome
respondede0
Value
40 or 80 kg applied N/hae0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Short-fallow crops responded up to 40 or 80 kg applied N/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 806–865 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rainfall most affected N responses of double-crop winter cereals.

Taxon
winter cerealse0
Outcome
responsese0
Qualifier
seasonal growing-season rainfalle0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“seasonal growing-season rainfall affected the responses of the double-crop winter cereals the most.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 873–972 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At Myling, N responses generally arose only under intensive cropping or slower N mineralization.

Taxon
cropse0
Outcome
Responses to applied fertiliser Ne0
Qualifier
high-intensity cropping periodse0
Setting
Myling sitee0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Responses to applied fertiliser N at the shorter duration cultivation Myling site (9 years at commencement) generally occurred only under high-intensity cropping periods, or in those crops sown following periods of slower potential N mineralisation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 973–1222 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

P fertilizer influenced grain N uptake at both sites in some years.

Taxon
winter cereals, legumes, and sorghume0
Treatment
Phosphorus fertiliser applicatione0
Outcome
grain N uptakee0
Qualifier
both locations in some yearse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Phosphorus fertiliser application influenced grain N uptake at both locations in some years, with winter cereals, legumes, and sorghum sown following long-fallow generally significant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1223–1407 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P fertilizer added to cumulative grain N uptake.

Taxon
cereal and legume cropse1
Treatment
fertiliser N and P treatmentse0
Outcome
Cumulative grain N uptakese0
Direction
additive effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Cumulative grain N uptakes in both experiments were independently influenced by fertiliser N and P treatments, P having an additive effect, increasing grain yield and grain N removed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1408–1591 · show in text ↑
e1

“summer and winter cereal and legume crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 73–114 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P fertilizer increased grain yield.

Taxon
cereal and legume cropse1
Treatment
Pe0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“P having an additive effect, increasing grain yield and grain N removed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1519–1591 · show in text ↑
e1

“summer and winter cereal and legume crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 73–114 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P fertilizer increased grain N removal.

Taxon
cereal and legume cropse1
Treatment
Pe0
Outcome
grain N removede0
Direction
increasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“P having an additive effect, increasing grain yield and grain N removed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1519–1591 · show in text ↑
e1

“summer and winter cereal and legume crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 73–114 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer N recovery in grain fell as N rate rose.

Taxon
cereal and legume cropse1
Treatment
fertiliser Ne0
Outcome
Recovery efficiency of fertiliser N in graine0
Direction
declinede0

Verbatim

e0

“Recovery efficiency of fertiliser N in grain, derived from cumulative N fertiliser application and grain N uptake, in general declined as amount of fertiliser N applied increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1592–1770 · show in text ↑
e1

“summer and winter cereal and legume crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 73–114 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P fertilizer raised N recovery in grain when N was less limiting.

Taxon
cereal and legume cropse1
Treatment
P fertilisere0
Outcome
fertiliser N recovery in graine0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
as N supplies became less limiting to yielde0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“as N supplies became less limiting to yield, P fertiliser generated higher fertiliser N recovery in grain.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1781–1887 · show in text ↑
e1

“summer and winter cereal and legume crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 73–114 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At Colonsay cumulative fertilizer N recovery was 0.48 with P at cumulative input 1340 kg N/ha.

Taxon
cereal and legume cropse1
Treatment
fertiliser P applicatione0
Outcome
RENG from cumulative uptake and removale0
Value
=0.48e0
Qualifier
=1340 kg N/hae0
Setting
Colonsaye0

Verbatim

e0

“At Colonsay, RENG from cumulative uptake and removal was =0.48 with fertiliser P application for cumulative fertiliser N input =1340 kg N/ha (˜80 kg fertiliser N/ha.crop).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1888–2059 · show in text ↑
e1

“summer and winter cereal and legume crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 73–114 · show in text ↑

fertilization · nutrient: content · Sorghum bicolor (sorghum)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 20 positive, 1 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

nitrogen · nutrient: content · Sorghum bicolor (sorghum)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 19 positive, 4 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.