Abstract
Pure protein, chlorophyll, carotene, and carbohydrates of Daucus carota throughout the vegetative period of first year as influenced by growth regulators (CCC, GA and BA) . 1) Carrot plants were treated for 9 weeks with gibberellic acid (GA 3 ), benzyladenine (BA) and chlorcholinechloride (CCC). 2) Yield of carrot roots (g/plant) was reduced by GA, and changed insignificantly by CCC and BA. Leaf yield was increased with GA and BA, and decreased with CCC. 3) The quantity of pure protein in carrot roots (mg/plant) increased with CCC and decreased with GA and BA. Opposite results were obtained for leaves. 4) The quantity of hydrolysable carbohydrates (g/plant) in roots decreased with GA, BA and CCC. In leaves GA and BA increased the yield of carbohydrates whereas CCC decreased it. 5) The quantity of carotene (mg/plant) in roots decreased strongly with GA and negligibly with BA. CCC increased the yield of carotene. 6) The quantity of chlorophyll (mg/plant) increased with GA and decreased with CCC. BA increased chlorophyll during the first half phase of the vegetative period and decreased in the other half phase. 7) Following relations were calculated for the duration of the vegetative period: a) hydrolysable carbohydrates to pure protein of leaves and roots. b) carotene (in the roots) to pure protein (in the leaves) c) Carotene (in the roots) to carbohydrates (in the roots) d) carbohydrates to chlorophyll in the leaves, furthermore was calculated e) the storing power of the living system of leaves for carbohydrates in the roots. 8) The time curves for daily synthesis capacity of system of leaves or their storing capacity for products in the roots show that protein, chlorophyll and carotene of leaves behave as components of the system while carbohydrates (as expected) belog to the product. Contrary to that the daily storing capacity of the system of leaves shows that protein, carotene and carbohydrates in the roots belong to the product. Thus the root proves to be a genuine storage organ in which the major quantities of protein and carotene are not involved in the metabolic processes but can be regarded as stored or end products. .
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 19
Claim · model-written summary
GA reduced carrot root yield.
- Taxon
- Daucus carota
Daucus carotat0 - Treatment
- GAe0
- Outcome
- Yield of carrot rootse0
- Direction
- reducede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Yield of carrot roots (g/plant) was reduced by GA, and changed insignificantly by CCC and BA.”
t0“Daucus carota”
Claim · model-written summary
CCC and BA insignificantly changed carrot root yield.
- Taxon
- Daucus carotaDaucus carotat0
- Treatment
- CCC and BAe0
- Outcome
- Yield of carrot rootse0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Yield of carrot roots (g/plant) was reduced by GA, and changed insignificantly by CCC and BA.”
t0“Daucus carota”
Claim · model-written summary
GA and BA increased carrot leaf yield.
- Taxon
- Daucus carotaDaucus carotat0
- Treatment
- GA and BAe0
- Outcome
- Leaf yielde0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Leaf yield was increased with GA and BA, and decreased with CCC.”
t0“Daucus carota”
Claim · model-written summary
CCC decreased carrot leaf yield.
- Taxon
- Daucus carotaDaucus carotat0
- Treatment
- CCCe0
- Outcome
- Leaf yielde0
- Direction
- decreasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Leaf yield was increased with GA and BA, and decreased with CCC.”
t0“Daucus carota”
Claim · model-written summary
CCC increased root pure protein but decreased leaf pure protein.
- Taxon
- Daucus carotaDaucus carotat0
- Organ / stage
- rootse0
- Treatment
- CCCe0
- Outcome
- pure proteine0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The quantity of pure protein in carrot roots (mg/plant) increased with CCC and decreased with GA and BA. Opposite results were obtained for leaves.”
t0“Daucus carota”
Claim · model-written summary
GA and BA decreased root pure protein but increased leaf pure protein.
- Taxon
- Daucus carotaDaucus carotat0
- Treatment
- GA and BAe0
- Outcome
- pure proteine0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The quantity of pure protein in carrot roots (mg/plant) increased with CCC and decreased with GA and BA. Opposite results were obtained for leaves.”
t0“Daucus carota”
Claim · model-written summary
GA, BA and CCC decreased root hydrolysable carbohydrates.
- Taxon
- Daucus carotaDaucus carotat0
- Organ / stage
- rootse0
- Treatment
- GA, BA and CCCe0
- Outcome
- hydrolysable carbohydratese0
- Direction
- decreasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The quantity of hydrolysable carbohydrates (g/plant) in roots decreased with GA, BA and CCC.”
t0“Daucus carota”
Claim · model-written summary
GA and BA increased leaf carbohydrate yield.
- Taxon
- Daucus carotaDaucus carotat0
- Organ / stage
- leavese0
- Treatment
- GA and BAe0
- Outcome
- yield of carbohydratese0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“In leaves GA and BA increased the yield of carbohydrates whereas CCC decreased it.”
t0“Daucus carota”
Claim · model-written summary
CCC decreased leaf carbohydrate yield.
- Taxon
- Daucus carotaDaucus carotat0
- Organ / stage
- leavese0
- Treatment
- CCCe0
- Outcome
- yield of carbohydratese0
- Direction
- decreasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“In leaves GA and BA increased the yield of carbohydrates whereas CCC decreased it.”
t0“Daucus carota”
Claim · model-written summary
GA strongly decreased root carotene.
- Taxon
- Daucus carotaDaucus carotat0
- Organ / stage
- rootse0
- Treatment
- GAe0
- Outcome
- quantity of carotenee0
- Direction
- decreasede0
- Qualifier
- stronglye0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The quantity of carotene (mg/plant) in roots decreased strongly with GA and negligibly with BA.”
t0“Daucus carota”
Claim · model-written summary
BA negligibly decreased root carotene.
- Taxon
- Daucus carotaDaucus carotat0
- Organ / stage
- rootse0
- Treatment
- BAe0
- Outcome
- quantity of carotenee0
- Direction
- decreasede0
- Qualifier
- negligiblye0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The quantity of carotene (mg/plant) in roots decreased strongly with GA and negligibly with BA.”
t0“Daucus carota”
Claim · model-written summary
CCC increased carotene yield.
- Taxon
- Daucus carotaDaucus carotat0
- Treatment
- CCCe0
- Outcome
- yield of carotenee0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“CCC increased the yield of carotene.”
t0“Daucus carota”
Claim · model-written summary
GA increased chlorophyll quantity.
- Taxon
- Daucus carotaDaucus carotat0
- Treatment
- GAe0
- Outcome
- quantity of chlorophylle0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The quantity of chlorophyll (mg/plant) increased with GA and decreased with CCC.”
t0“Daucus carota”
Claim · model-written summary
CCC decreased chlorophyll quantity.
- Taxon
- Daucus carotaDaucus carotat0
- Treatment
- CCCe0
- Outcome
- quantity of chlorophylle0
- Direction
- decreasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The quantity of chlorophyll (mg/plant) increased with GA and decreased with CCC.”
t0“Daucus carota”
Claim · model-written summary
BA increased chlorophyll in the first half of the vegetative period.
- Taxon
- Daucus carotaDaucus carotat0
- Treatment
- BAe0
- Outcome
- chlorophylle0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Qualifier
- first half phase of the vegetative periode0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“BA increased chlorophyll during the first half phase of the vegetative period and decreased in the other half phase.”
t0“Daucus carota”
Claim · model-written summary
BA decreased chlorophyll in the other half of the vegetative period.
- Taxon
- Daucus carotaDaucus carotat0
- Treatment
- BAe0
- Outcome
- chlorophylle0
- Direction
- decreasede0
- Qualifier
- other half phasee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“BA increased chlorophyll during the first half phase of the vegetative period and decreased in the other half phase.”
t0“Daucus carota”
Claim · model-written summary
Leaf protein, chlorophyll and carotene behave as system components, whereas carbohydrates behave as product.
- Taxon
- Daucus carotaDaucus carotat0
- Organ / stage
- leavese0
- Outcome
- components of the systeme0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“protein, chlorophyll and carotene of leaves behave as components of the system while carbohydrates (as expected) belog to the product.”
t0“Daucus carota”
Claim · model-written summary
Root protein, carotene and carbohydrates belong to the stored product.
- Taxon
- Daucus carotaDaucus carotat0
- Organ / stage
- rootse0
- Outcome
- belong to the producte0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“protein, carotene and carbohydrates in the roots belong to the product.”
t0“Daucus carota”
Claim · model-written summary
The root is a storage organ whose major protein and carotene quantities are stored or end products rather than metabolically involved.
- Taxon
- Daucus carotaDaucus carotat0
- Organ / stage
- roote0
- Outcome
- genuine storage organe0
- Qualifier
- not involved in the metabolic processese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Thus the root proves to be a genuine storage organ in which the major quantities of protein and carotene are not involved in the metabolic processes but can be regarded as stored or end products.”
t0“Daucus carota”
The same questions in other papers
Gibberellic acid · yield · Daucus carota (carrot)Results differ
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →N-benzyladenine · quality: phytochemicals · Daucus carota (carrot)Positive and negative results
1 in the opposite direction
- positive
N-benzyladenine · physiology: pigments · Daucus carota (carrot)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
Gibberellic acid · quality: phytochemicals · Daucus carota (carrot)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- negative
Gibberellic acid · physiology: pigments · Daucus carota (carrot)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
N-benzyladenine · yield · Daucus carota (carrot)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.