Paper · 2015 · Journal of Integrative Agriculture

Effects of inter-culture, arabinogalactan proteins, and hydrogen peroxide on the plant regeneration of wheat immature embryos

Wei ZHANG; Xin-min WANG; Rong FAN; et al.

18
claims
37
verbatim quotes
21
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

The regeneration rate of wheat immature embryo varies among genotypes, howbeit many elite agriculture wheat varieties have low regeneration rates. Optimization of tissue culture conditions and attempts of adding signal molecules are effective ways to increase plant regeneration rate. Inter-culture is one of ways that have not been investigated in plant tissue culture. Moreover, the use of arabinogalactan proteins (AGPs) and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) have been reported to increase regeneration rate in a few plant species other than wheat. The current research pioneeringly uses inter-culture of immature embryos of different wheat genotypes, and also investigates impacts of AGP and H2O2 on the induction of embryogenic calli and plant regeneration. As a result, high-frequency regeneration wheat cultivars Kenong 199 (KN199) and Xinchun 9 (XC9), together with low-frequency regeneration wheat line Chinese Spring (CS), presented striking increase in the induction of embryogenic calli and plant regeneration rate of CS through inter-culture strategy, up to 52.19 and 67.98%, respectively. Adding 50 to 200 mg L−1 AGP or 0.005 to 0.01 ‰ H2O2 to the callus induction medium, enhanced growth of embryogenic calli and plant regeneration rate in quite a few wheat genotypes. At 50 mg L−1 AGP application level in callus induction medium plant regeneration rates of 8.49, 409.06 and 283.16% were achieved for Jimai 22 (JM22), Jingdong 18 (JD18) and Yangmai 18 (YM18), respectively; whereas at 100 mg L−1 AGP level, CS (105.44%), Chuannong 16 (CN16) (80.60%) and Ningchun 4 (NC4) (62.87%) acted the best. Moreover CS (79.05%), JM22 (7.55%), CN16 (101.87%), YM18 (365.56%), Yangmai 20 (YM20) (10.48%), and CB301 (187.40%) were more responsive to 0.005 ‰ of H2O2, and NC4 (35.37%) obtained the highest shoot regeneration rates at 0.01 ‰ of H2O2. Overall, these two methods, inter-culture and AGP (or H2O2) application, can be further applied to wheat transgenic research.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 18

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inter-culture increased embryogenic callus induction in Chinese Spring to 52.19%.

Material
Chinese Springe0
Treatment
inter-culture strategye0
Outcome
induction of embryogenic callie0
Direction
increasee0
Value
52.19e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheat line Chinese Spring (CS), presented striking increase in the induction of embryogenic calli and plant regeneration rate of CS through inter-culture strategy, up to 52.19 and 67.98%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 892–1092 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inter-culture increased Chinese Spring plant regeneration rate to 67.98%.

Material
Chinese Springe0
Treatment
inter-culture strategye0
Outcome
plant regeneration ratee0
Direction
increasee0
Value
67.98%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheat line Chinese Spring (CS), presented striking increase in the induction of embryogenic calli and plant regeneration rate of CS through inter-culture strategy, up to 52.19 and 67.98%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 892–1092 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AGP enhanced embryogenic callus growth and regeneration in several wheat genotypes.

Treatment
50 to 200 mg L−1 AGPe0
Outcome
growth of embryogenic calli and plant regeneration ratee0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Adding 50 to 200 mg L−1 AGP or 0.005 to 0.01 ‰ H2O2 to the callus induction medium, enhanced growth of embryogenic calli and plant regeneration rate in quite a few wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1094–1273 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hydrogen peroxide enhanced embryogenic callus growth and regeneration in several wheat genotypes.

Treatment
0.005 to 0.01 ‰ H2O2e0
Outcome
growth of embryogenic calli and plant regeneration ratee0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Adding 50 to 200 mg L−1 AGP or 0.005 to 0.01 ‰ H2O2 to the callus induction medium, enhanced growth of embryogenic calli and plant regeneration rate in quite a few wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1094–1273 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 50 mg L−1 AGP, Jimai 22 regeneration was 8.49%.

Material
Jimai 22e0
Treatment
50 mg L−1 AGPe0
Outcome
plant regeneration ratese0
Value
8.49e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–108 · show in text ↑
e0

“At 50 mg L−1 AGP application level in callus induction medium plant regeneration rates of 8.49, 409.06 and 283.16% were achieved for Jimai 22 (JM22), Jingdong 18 (JD18) and Yangmai 18 (YM18), respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1275–1479 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 50 mg L−1 AGP, Jingdong 18 regeneration was 409.06%.

Material
Jingdong 18e0
Treatment
50 mg L−1 AGPe0
Outcome
plant regeneration ratese0
Value
409.06e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–108 · show in text ↑
e0

“At 50 mg L−1 AGP application level in callus induction medium plant regeneration rates of 8.49, 409.06 and 283.16% were achieved for Jimai 22 (JM22), Jingdong 18 (JD18) and Yangmai 18 (YM18), respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1275–1479 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 50 mg L−1 AGP, Yangmai 18 regeneration was 283.16%.

Material
Yangmai 18e0
Treatment
50 mg L−1 AGPe0
Outcome
plant regeneration ratese0
Value
283.16%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–108 · show in text ↑
e0

“At 50 mg L−1 AGP application level in callus induction medium plant regeneration rates of 8.49, 409.06 and 283.16% were achieved for Jimai 22 (JM22), Jingdong 18 (JD18) and Yangmai 18 (YM18), respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1275–1479 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 100 mg L−1 AGP, Chinese Spring regeneration was 105.44%.

Material
Chinese Springe1
Treatment
100 mg L−1 AGPe0
Outcome
acted the beste0
Value
105.44%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–108 · show in text ↑
e0

“at 100 mg L−1 AGP level, CS (105.44%), Chuannong 16 (CN16) (80.60%) and Ningchun 4 (NC4) (62.87%) acted the best”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1489–1601 · show in text ↑
e1

“Chinese Spring (CS)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 903–922 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 100 mg L−1 AGP, Chuannong 16 regeneration was 80.60%.

Material
Chuannong 16e0
Treatment
100 mg L−1 AGPe0
Outcome
acted the beste0
Value
80.60%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–108 · show in text ↑
e0

“at 100 mg L−1 AGP level, CS (105.44%), Chuannong 16 (CN16) (80.60%) and Ningchun 4 (NC4) (62.87%) acted the best”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1489–1601 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 100 mg L−1 AGP, Ningchun 4 regeneration was 62.87%.

Material
Ningchun 4e0
Treatment
100 mg L−1 AGPe0
Outcome
acted the beste0
Value
62.87%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–108 · show in text ↑
e0

“at 100 mg L−1 AGP level, CS (105.44%), Chuannong 16 (CN16) (80.60%) and Ningchun 4 (NC4) (62.87%) acted the best”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1489–1601 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 0.005 ‰ H2O2, Chinese Spring response was 79.05%.

Material
Chinese Springe1
Treatment
0.005 ‰ of H2O2e0
Outcome
more responsivee0
Value
79.05%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–108 · show in text ↑
e0

“Moreover CS (79.05%), JM22 (7.55%), CN16 (101.87%), YM18 (365.56%), Yangmai 20 (YM20) (10.48%), and CB301 (187.40%) were more responsive to 0.005 ‰ of H2O2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1603–1758 · show in text ↑
e1

“Chinese Spring (CS)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 903–922 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 0.005 ‰ H2O2, Jimai 22 response was 7.55%.

Material
Jimai 22e1
Treatment
0.005 ‰ of H2O2e0
Outcome
more responsivee0
Value
7.55%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–108 · show in text ↑
e0

“Moreover CS (79.05%), JM22 (7.55%), CN16 (101.87%), YM18 (365.56%), Yangmai 20 (YM20) (10.48%), and CB301 (187.40%) were more responsive to 0.005 ‰ of H2O2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1603–1758 · show in text ↑
e1

“Jimai 22 (JM22)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1408–1423 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 0.005 ‰ H2O2, Chuannong 16 response was 101.87%.

Material
Chuannong 16e1
Treatment
0.005 ‰ of H2O2e0
Outcome
more responsivee0
Value
101.87%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–108 · show in text ↑
e0

“Moreover CS (79.05%), JM22 (7.55%), CN16 (101.87%), YM18 (365.56%), Yangmai 20 (YM20) (10.48%), and CB301 (187.40%) were more responsive to 0.005 ‰ of H2O2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1603–1758 · show in text ↑
e1

“Chuannong 16 (CN16)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1528–1547 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 0.005 ‰ H2O2, Yangmai 18 response was 365.56%.

Material
Yangmai 18e1
Treatment
0.005 ‰ of H2O2e0
Outcome
more responsivee0
Value
365.56%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–108 · show in text ↑
e0

“Moreover CS (79.05%), JM22 (7.55%), CN16 (101.87%), YM18 (365.56%), Yangmai 20 (YM20) (10.48%), and CB301 (187.40%) were more responsive to 0.005 ‰ of H2O2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1603–1758 · show in text ↑
e1

“Yangmai 18 (YM18)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1448–1465 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 0.005 ‰ H2O2, Yangmai 20 response was 10.48%.

Material
Yangmai 20e0
Treatment
0.005 ‰ of H2O2e0
Outcome
more responsivee0
Value
10.48%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–108 · show in text ↑
e0

“Moreover CS (79.05%), JM22 (7.55%), CN16 (101.87%), YM18 (365.56%), Yangmai 20 (YM20) (10.48%), and CB301 (187.40%) were more responsive to 0.005 ‰ of H2O2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1603–1758 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 0.005 ‰ H2O2, CB301 response was 187.40%.

Material
CB301e0
Treatment
0.005 ‰ of H2O2e0
Outcome
more responsivee0
Value
187.40%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–108 · show in text ↑
e0

“Moreover CS (79.05%), JM22 (7.55%), CN16 (101.87%), YM18 (365.56%), Yangmai 20 (YM20) (10.48%), and CB301 (187.40%) were more responsive to 0.005 ‰ of H2O2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1603–1758 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ningchun 4 had its highest shoot regeneration at 0.01 ‰ H2O2, at 35.37%.

Material
Ningchun 4e1
Treatment
0.01 ‰ of H2O2e0
Outcome
shoot regeneration ratese0
Direction
higheste0
Value
35.37%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–108 · show in text ↑
e0

“NC4 (35.37%) obtained the highest shoot regeneration rates at 0.01 ‰ of H2O2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1764–1840 · show in text ↑
e1

“Ningchun 4 (NC4)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1561–1577 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors suggest applying inter-culture and AGP or H2O2 in wheat transgenic research.

Outcome
can be further applied to wheat transgenic researche0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“these two methods, inter-culture and AGP (or H2O2) application, can be further applied to wheat transgenic research”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1851–1966 · show in text ↑

hydrogen peroxide · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

21 papers: 16 positive, 5 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.