Paper · 2001 · Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science

Response of Corn Hybrids Differing in Canopy Architecture to Chemical and Mechanical (Rotary Hoeing) Weed Control: Morphology and Yield

S. H. Begna; R. I. Hamilton; L. M. Dwyer; et al.

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
4
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Weed interference with the growth and yield of corn plants is affected by both mechanical and chemical means of weed control. Recently, corn hybrids accumulating more leaf area, maturing earlier, yielding better in narrower row spacings and tolerating higher plant populations better than conventional hybrids have been developed. Because of more rapid leaf area accumulation during the earliest stages of canopy development and overall canopy architecture, they may be more susceptible to damage due to mechanical weed control. The objective of this study was to assess the response of corn hybrids with a wide range of canopy architectures to chemical and mechanical (rotary hoeing) weed control, with an emphasis on quantifying morphology and grain yield responses. Field experiments were conducted in 1997 and 1998 at Ste. Anne de Bellevue, Quebec. Three hybrids were tested: leafy reduced‐stature (LRS1 and LRS2), and the conventional hybrid Pioneer 3979 (P3979). Rotary hoeing alone had very little effect, while herbicide application reduced the interference of weeds with growth and grain yield of all hybrids. Hybrid P3979 had more total leaf area than LRS1 and LRS2, but the percentage of leaf area above the ear was much higher for LRS hybrids (70 %) than for P3979 (51 %). Generally, LRS hybrids were much shorter with more leaf area above the ear than P3979, contributing to the large differences in canopy architecture between the LRS hybrids and P3979. However, morphology and grain yield response of hybrids to rotary hoeing and herbicide weed control was not different, indicating that the new hybrids were not more susceptible to damage caused by mechanical weed control than a corn hybrid with a conventional canopy architecture.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rotary hoeing alone had very little effect.

Treatment
Rotary hoeinge0
Outcome
very little effecte0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Rotary hoeing alone had very little effect”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 969–1011 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn Hybrids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–24 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicide reduced weed interference with growth.

Treatment
herbicide applicatione0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
interference of weeds with growthe0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“herbicide application reduced the interference of weeds with growth and grain yield of all hybrids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1019–1117 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn Hybrids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–24 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicide reduced weed interference with grain yield.

Treatment
herbicide applicatione0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“herbicide application reduced the interference of weeds with growth and grain yield of all hybrids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1019–1117 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn Hybrids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–24 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P3979 had more total leaf area than LRS1.

Material
P3979e0
Outcome
total leaf areae0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
LRS1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Hybrid P3979 had more total leaf area than LRS1 and LRS2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1119–1175 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn Hybrids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–24 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P3979 had more total leaf area than LRS2.

Material
P3979e0
Outcome
total leaf areae0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
LRS2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Hybrid P3979 had more total leaf area than LRS1 and LRS2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1119–1175 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn Hybrids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–24 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

LRS hybrids had 70% of leaf area above the ear versus 51% in P3979.

Material
LRS hybridse0
Outcome
percentage of leaf area above the eare0
Direction
much highere0
Value
70 %e0
Qualifier
51 %e0
Comparator
P3979e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the percentage of leaf area above the ear was much higher for LRS hybrids (70 %) than for P3979 (51 %)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1181–1283 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn Hybrids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–24 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

LRS hybrids were generally much shorter than P3979.

Material
LRS hybridse0
Outcome
shortere0
Direction
shortere0
Comparator
P3979e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Generally, LRS hybrids were much shorter with more leaf area above the ear than P3979”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1285–1370 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn Hybrids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–24 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hybrids did not differ in morphology response to weed control.

Treatment
rotary hoeing and herbicide weed controle0
Outcome
morphologye0
Direction
not differente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“morphology and grain yield response of hybrids to rotary hoeing and herbicide weed control was not different”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1477–1585 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn Hybrids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–24 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hybrids did not differ in grain yield response to weed control.

Treatment
rotary hoeing and herbicide weed controle0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
not differente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“morphology and grain yield response of hybrids to rotary hoeing and herbicide weed control was not different”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1477–1585 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn Hybrids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–24 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The new hybrids were not more susceptible to rotary hoe damage than conventional architecture.

Material
new hybridse0
Outcome
damage caused by mechanical weed controle0
Direction
not more susceptiblee0
Comparator
a corn hybrid with a conventional canopy architecturee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“new hybrids were not more susceptible to damage caused by mechanical weed control than a corn hybrid with a conventional canopy architecture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1607–1747 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn Hybrids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–24 · show in text ↑

herbicide · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

143 papers: 86 positive, 57 negative or no effect

56 papers in the same direction as this paper · 86 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

139 papers more in this group

See all 143 papers →

herbicide · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

651 papers: 500 positive, 151 negative or no effect

150 papers in the same direction as this paper · 500 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
    Mean net return was moderately higher for herbicides.

    Evaluation of Mechanical Weed Management Programs for Corn (Zea mays) · 1997 · compared with best mechanical treatment

    Opposite directionCited by this paper

  3. negative

647 papers more in this group

See all 651 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.