Paper · 2007 · Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE B

Effects of nitrogen fertilization strategies on nitrogen use efficiency in physiology, recovery, and agronomy and redistribution of dry matter accumulation and nitrogen accumulation in two typical rice cultivars in Zhejiang, China

Wen-xia Xie; Guang-huo Wang; Qi-chun Zhang; et al.

9
claims
17
verbatim quotes
23
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted in farmers' rice fields in 2001 and 2002 to study the effects of nitrogen (N) management strategies on N use efficiency in recovery (RE), agronomy (AE) and physiology (PE) and redistribution of dry matter accumulation (DMA) and nitrogen accumulation (NA) in two typical rice cultivars in Jinhua, Zhejiang Province. This study aimed mainly at identifying the possible causes of poor fertilizer N use efficiency (NUE) of rice in Zhejiang by comparing farmers' fertilizer practice (FFP) with advanced site-specific nutrient management (SSNM) and real-time N management (RTNM). The results showed that compared to FFP, SSNM and RTNM reduced DMA and NA before panicle initiation and increased DMA and NA at post-flowering. There is no significant difference between SSNM and FFP in post-flowering dry matter redistribution (post-DMR) and post-flowering nitrogen redistribution (post-NR). These results suggest that high input rate of fertilizer N and improper fertilizer N timing are the main factors causing low NUE of irrigated rice in the farmer's routine practice of Zhejiang. With SSNM, about 15% of the current total N input in direct-seeding early rice and 45% in single rice could be reduced without yield loss in Zhejiang, China.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SSNM and RTNM reduced dry matter accumulation before panicle initiation relative to FFP.

Treatment
SSNM and RTNMe0
Outcome
DMAe0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
before panicle initiatione0
Comparator
FFPe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“compared to FFP, SSNM and RTNM reduced DMA and NA before panicle initiation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 631–706 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 197–201 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SSNM and RTNM reduced nitrogen accumulation before panicle initiation relative to FFP.

Treatment
SSNM and RTNMe0
Outcome
NAe0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
before panicle initiatione0
Comparator
FFPe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“compared to FFP, SSNM and RTNM reduced DMA and NA before panicle initiation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 631–706 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 197–201 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SSNM and RTNM increased post-flowering dry matter accumulation relative to FFP.

Treatment
SSNM and RTNMe0
Outcome
DMAe0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
post-floweringe0
Comparator
FFPe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SSNM and RTNM reduced DMA and NA before panicle initiation and increased DMA and NA at post-flowering”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 648–749 · show in text ↑
e1

“compared to FFP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 631–646 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 197–201 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SSNM and RTNM increased post-flowering nitrogen accumulation relative to FFP.

Treatment
SSNM and RTNMe0
Outcome
NAe0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
post-floweringe0
Comparator
FFPe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SSNM and RTNM reduced DMA and NA before panicle initiation and increased DMA and NA at post-flowering”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 648–749 · show in text ↑
e1

“compared to FFP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 631–646 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 197–201 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

SSNM and FFP did not differ significantly in post-flowering dry matter redistribution.

Treatment
SSNMe0
Outcome
post-flowering dry matter redistributione0
Direction
no significant differencee0
Comparator
FFPe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There is no significant difference between SSNM and FFP in post-flowering dry matter redistribution (post-DMR)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 751–861 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 197–201 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

SSNM and FFP did not differ significantly in post-flowering nitrogen redistribution.

Treatment
SSNMe0
Outcome
post-flowering nitrogen redistributione0
Direction
no significant differencee0
Comparator
FFPe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There is no significant difference between SSNM and FFP in post-flowering dry matter redistribution (post-DMR) and post-flowering nitrogen redistribution (post-NR)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 751–914 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 197–201 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High fertilizer N input and improper timing are suggested causes of low N use efficiency.

Outcome
low NUEe0
Qualifier
high input rate of fertilizer N and improper fertilizer N timinge0
Setting
Zhejiange0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“high input rate of fertilizer N and improper fertilizer N timing are the main factors causing low NUE of irrigated rice in the farmer's routine practice of Zhejiang”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 943–1107 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

With SSNM, direct-seeding early rice N input could fall about 15% without yield loss.

Treatment
SSNMe0
Outcome
total N inpute0
Direction
reducede0
Value
15%e0
Qualifier
without yield losse0
Setting
Zhejiang, Chinae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“With SSNM, about 15% of the current total N input in direct-seeding early rice and 45% in single rice could be reduced without yield loss in Zhejiang, China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1109–1265 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

With SSNM, single rice N input could fall 45% without yield loss.

Treatment
SSNMe0
Outcome
total N inpute0
Direction
reducede0
Value
45%e0
Qualifier
without yield losse0
Setting
Zhejiang, Chinae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“With SSNM, about 15% of the current total N input in direct-seeding early rice and 45% in single rice could be reduced without yield loss in Zhejiang, China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1109–1265 · show in text ↑

climate site · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

30 papers: 23 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

26 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

fertilization · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

759 papers: 670 positive, 89 negative or no effect

88 papers in the same direction as this paper · 670 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

755 papers more in this group

See all 759 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.