Paper · 1966 · Canadian Journal of Plant Science

SEVERAL SOIL MANAGEMENT PRACTICES INFLUENCING THE GROWTH AND RHIZOME DEVELOPMENT OF THE LOWBUSH BLUEBERRY

Walter J. Kender; Franklin P. Eggert

9
claims
14
verbatim quotes
17
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment using various soil management practices showed that the most effective means to increase blueberry plant spread was through the use of a surface mulch. Peat and sawdust were of equal suitability as a mulching material influencing vegetative growth, although sawdust did result in a reduction in the number of flower buds produced when compared with peat. Mulching was associated with a higher soil moisture content than non-mulched plots.Blueberry plants growing in nitrogen-treated plots had an increased flower bud number and rhizome growth in contrast with those growing in unfertilized plots. Nitrogen fertilization was of particular benefit when applied in association with surface organic mulches.Plants growing in an undisturbed soil were more vigorous than in a homogenized or tilled soil. Sawdust was found to be detrimental to the growth of lowbush blueberry plants when incorporated into a homogenized soil.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Surface mulch most effectively increased blueberry spread.

Taxon
blueberrye0
Treatment
surface mulche0
Outcome
blueberry plant spreade0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the most effective means to increase blueberry plant spread was through the use of a surface mulch.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 71–170 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Peat and sawdust mulches had equal suitability for vegetative growth.

Taxon
blueberryt0
Treatment
sawduste0
Outcome
vegetative growthe0
Direction
equale0
Comparator
Peate0

Verbatim

e0

“Peat and sawdust were of equal suitability as a mulching material influencing vegetative growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 171–266 · show in text ↑
t0

“LOWBUSH BLUEBERRY”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–105 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sawdust mulch reduced flower bud number compared with peat.

Taxon
blueberryt0
Treatment
sawduste0
Outcome
number of flower budse0
Direction
reductione0
Comparator
peate0

Verbatim

e0

“sawdust did result in a reduction in the number of flower buds produced when compared with peat.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 277–373 · show in text ↑
t0

“LOWBUSH BLUEBERRY”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–105 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulched plots had higher soil moisture than unmulched plots.

Taxon
Blueberryt0
Treatment
Mulchinge0
Outcome
soil moisture contente0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
non-mulched plotse0

Verbatim

e0

“Mulching was associated with a higher soil moisture content than non-mulched plots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 374–457 · show in text ↑
t0

“BLUEBERRY”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–105 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen treatment increased flower bud number in blueberry.

Taxon
Blueberrye0
Treatment
nitrogen-treated plotse0
Outcome
flower bud numbere0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
unfertilized plotse0

Verbatim

e0

“Blueberry plants growing in nitrogen-treated plots had an increased flower bud number and rhizome growth in contrast with those growing in unfertilized plots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 457–615 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen treatment increased blueberry rhizome growth.

Taxon
Blueberrye0
Treatment
nitrogen-treated plotse0
Outcome
rhizome growthe0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
unfertilized plotse0

Verbatim

e0

“Blueberry plants growing in nitrogen-treated plots had an increased flower bud number and rhizome growth in contrast with those growing in unfertilized plots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 457–615 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen fertilization was especially beneficial with organic mulch.

Taxon
blueberryt0
Treatment
Nitrogen fertilizatione0
Outcome
particular benefite0
Comparator
surface organic mulchese0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrogen fertilization was of particular benefit when applied in association with surface organic mulches.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 616–722 · show in text ↑
t0

“blueberry”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 96–105 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Undisturbed soil produced more vigorous plants than homogenized or tilled soil.

Taxon
blueberryt0
Treatment
undisturbed soile0
Outcome
vigorouse0
Direction
more vigorouse0
Comparator
homogenized or tilled soile0

Verbatim

e0

“Plants growing in an undisturbed soil were more vigorous than in a homogenized or tilled soil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 722–816 · show in text ↑
t0

“blueberry”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 96–105 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sawdust incorporated into homogenized soil harmed lowbush blueberry growth.

Taxon
lowbush blueberryVaccinium angustifoliume0
Treatment
Sawduste0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
detrimentale0
Qualifier
incorporated into a homogenized soile0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vaccinium angustifolium
Vaccinium angustifolium · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sawdust was found to be detrimental to the growth of lowbush blueberry plants when incorporated into a homogenized soil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 817–937 · show in text ↑

growing medium · growth · Vaccinium angustifolium (lowbush blueberry)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

nitrogen · growth · VacciniumPositive and negative results

8 papers: 5 positive, 3 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

mulching · growth · VacciniumPositive and negative results

12 papers: 9 positive, 3 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

growing medium · growth · VacciniumPositive and negative results

14 papers: 13 positive, 1 negative or no effect

13 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
    Woodard blueberry cuttings rooted best in pine bark media compared with peatmoss media.

    Propagation of Blueberry by Softwood Terminal Cuttings in Pine Bark and Peat Media1 · 1982 · compared with sphagnum peatmoss alone or mixed with equal parts of perlite

    No difference from an alternative

  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.