Paper · 1992 · HortScience

FERTILIZER RESPONSIVENESS OF `WOODARD' IN RABBITEYE BLUEBERRY

T. Tamada

5
claims
12
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The fertilizer responsiveness to macronutrients of `Woodard' was investigated to obtain the data for the recommended rate of fertilizer application in a rabbiteye blueberry. One-year-old rooted cuttings of 'Woodard was grown under water culture in 1991. The plot was consisted of 13, a control (application rate: N-28, P-30, K-40, Ca-40, Mg-24 ppm) and 12 high volume application plots of macronutrients (applicated 5 times that of the control). The growth (dry mater per bush) was most superior in the N+Mg plot, most inferior in the N+Ca, the other plots was medium. As compared with the control, the growth of N+Mg, P+K, P+Ca, P+Mg, K+Ca, K+Ca+Mg and Ca+Mg plots was better than the control, and the growth of N+K, N+P+K and K+Mg plots was below. The concentration of macroelements in leaves of the control plot was low among all of. In each plots of high volume application of macronutrients, the concentration of the macroelements in leaves with some exceptions, became high, and the interaction between nutrient elements was confirmed. The difference of the growth of `Woodard' was considerd to be caused not only by the excess of some macroelements but also the imbalance of certain elements in the leaf and root.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N+Mg produced the strongest bush dry-matter growth.

Taxon
BLUEBERRYt0
Treatment
N+Mge0
Outcome
growth (dry mater per bush)e0
Direction
most superiore0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The growth (dry mater per bush) was most superior in the N+Mg plot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 446–512 · show in text ↑
t0

“RABBITEYE BLUEBERRY”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–61 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N+Ca produced the poorest bush growth.

Taxon
BLUEBERRYt0
Treatment
N+Cae0
Outcome
growth (dry mater per bush)e1
Direction
most inferiore0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“most inferior in the N+Ca”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 514–539 · show in text ↑
e1

“The growth (dry mater per bush) was most superior in the N+Mg plot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 446–512 · show in text ↑
t0

“RABBITEYE BLUEBERRY”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–61 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Several macronutrient combinations increased growth relative to control.

Taxon
BLUEBERRYt0
Treatment
N+Mg, P+K, P+Ca, P+Mg, K+Ca, K+Ca+Mg and Ca+Mge0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
the controle0

Verbatim

e0

“the growth of N+Mg, P+K, P+Ca, P+Mg, K+Ca, K+Ca+Mg and Ca+Mg plots was better than the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 599–693 · show in text ↑
t0

“RABBITEYE BLUEBERRY”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–61 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N+K, N+P+K and K+Mg reduced growth relative to control.

Taxon
BLUEBERRYt0
Treatment
N+K, N+P+K and K+Mge0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
belowe0
Comparator
the controle1

Verbatim

e0

“the growth of N+K, N+P+K and K+Mg plots was below”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 699–748 · show in text ↑
e1

“As compared with the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 569–597 · show in text ↑
t0

“RABBITEYE BLUEBERRY”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–61 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High macronutrient application generally raised leaf macroelement concentrations.

Taxon
BLUEBERRYt0
Treatment
high volume application of macronutrientse0
Outcome
concentration of the macroelements in leavese0
Direction
became highe0
Qualifier
with some exceptionse0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“In each plots of high volume application of macronutrients, the concentration of the macroelements in leaves with some exceptions, became high”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 837–979 · show in text ↑
t0

“RABBITEYE BLUEBERRY”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–61 · show in text ↑

calcium atom · growth · VacciniumResults agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

potassium · growth · VacciniumPositive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

nitrogen · growth · VacciniumPositive and negative results

8 papers: 5 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

phosphorus · growth · VacciniumResults agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.