Paper · 1998 · The Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology

Establishment of a non-dormant blueberry (Vaccinium corymbosumhybrid) production system in a warm winter climate

R. K. Reeder; T. A. Obreza; R. L. Darnell

12
claims
23
verbatim quotes
14
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Summary‘Gulf Coast’, ‘Sharpblue’, and ‘Wannabe’ southern highbush blueberry (Vaccinium corymbosum interspecific hybrid) cultivars were planted at a density of 10,000 plants per ha in southwest Florida to test the feasibility of a non-dormant blueberry production system. A non-dormant production system involves application of nitrogen (N) throughout the fall and winter, which enables the plants to avoid the normal dormancy cycle and the concomitant chilling requirement. If successful, this system could extend the production range of blueberry into subtropical and tropical areas where chilling temperatures are inadequate for traditional (dormant) production systems. Nitrogen fertilizer rate (84 to 252 kg ha–1 N in year 1, 168 to 336 kg ha–1 N in year 2) was evaluated for effects on maintaining plant growth and development in this system. Additionally, since organic soil amendments are known to improve blueberry growth, the effects of municipal solid waste (MSW) compost and acidic peat on maintaining growth were also evaluated. In general, increasing N rates from 84 to 252 kg ha–1 (year 1) or 168 to 252 kg ha–1 (year 2) increased plant canopy volume, leaf retention, and rate of new vegetative budbreak. There was no consistent effect of N rates on soil nutrient concentrations, but leaf N increased and leaf Ca decreased as N rate increased. MSW compost incorporation increased P, Ca, Mg, Cu, Fe, Mn, and Zn soil concentrations compared with peat, but had no consistent effect on leaf nutrient concentrations. Plant height and canopy volume were consistently greater for plants grown in the MSW compost compared with the peat amendment, but there were no differences in leaf retention or vegetative budbreak between the two soil amendments. Plants in this non-dormant system have shown no deleterious growth effects, suggesting that establishing a blueberry planting in a warm winter climate is feasible under the described conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing N rates increased plant canopy volume, leaf retention and the rate of new vegetative budbreak of blueberry in southwest Florida.

Taxon
blueberrye0
Treatment
increasing N ratese1
Outcome
plant canopy volume, leaf retention, and rate of new vegetative budbreake1
Direction
increasede1
Setting
southwest Floridae0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“southern highbush blueberry (Vaccinium corymbosum interspecific hybrid) cultivars were planted at a density of 10,000 plants per ha in southwest Florida”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 48–200 · show in text ↑
e1

“increasing N rates from 84 to 252 kg ha–1 (year 1) or 168 to 252 kg ha–1 (year 2) increased plant canopy volume, leaf retention, and rate of new vegetative budbreak”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1053–1217 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf N of blueberry increased as N rate increased.

Taxon
blueberrye0
Organ / stage
leafe1
Treatment
N ratee1
Outcome
leaf Ne1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“southern highbush blueberry (Vaccinium corymbosum interspecific hybrid) cultivars were planted at a density of 10,000 plants per ha in southwest Florida”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 48–200 · show in text ↑
e1

“There was no consistent effect of N rates on soil nutrient concentrations, but leaf N increased and leaf Ca decreased as N rate increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1219–1356 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf Ca of blueberry decreased as N rate increased.

Taxon
blueberrye0
Organ / stage
leafe1
Treatment
N ratee1
Outcome
leaf Cae1
Direction
decreasede1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“southern highbush blueberry (Vaccinium corymbosum interspecific hybrid) cultivars were planted at a density of 10,000 plants per ha in southwest Florida”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 48–200 · show in text ↑
e1

“There was no consistent effect of N rates on soil nutrient concentrations, but leaf N increased and leaf Ca decreased as N rate increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1219–1356 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N rates had no consistent effect on soil nutrient concentrations.

Taxon
blueberrye0
Treatment
N ratese1
Outcome
soil nutrient concentrationse1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“southern highbush blueberry (Vaccinium corymbosum interspecific hybrid) cultivars were planted at a density of 10,000 plants per ha in southwest Florida”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 48–200 · show in text ↑
e1

“There was no consistent effect of N rates on soil nutrient concentrations, but leaf N increased and leaf Ca decreased as N rate increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1219–1356 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MSW compost increased soil P, Ca and Mg concentrations compared with peat.

Taxon
blueberrye0
Treatment
MSW compost incorporatione1
Outcome
P, Ca, Mge1
Direction
increasede1
Comparator
peate1

Verbatim

e0

“southern highbush blueberry (Vaccinium corymbosum interspecific hybrid) cultivars were planted at a density of 10,000 plants per ha in southwest Florida”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 48–200 · show in text ↑
e1

“MSW compost incorporation increased P, Ca, Mg, Cu, Fe, Mn, and Zn soil concentrations compared with peat, but had no consistent effect on leaf nutrient concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1358–1524 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MSW compost increased soil Cu, Fe and Mn concentrations compared with peat.

Taxon
blueberrye0
Treatment
MSW compost incorporatione1
Outcome
Cu, Fe, Mne1
Direction
increasede1
Comparator
peate1

Verbatim

e0

“southern highbush blueberry (Vaccinium corymbosum interspecific hybrid) cultivars were planted at a density of 10,000 plants per ha in southwest Florida”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 48–200 · show in text ↑
e1

“MSW compost incorporation increased P, Ca, Mg, Cu, Fe, Mn, and Zn soil concentrations compared with peat, but had no consistent effect on leaf nutrient concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1358–1524 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MSW compost increased soil Zn concentration compared with peat.

Taxon
blueberrye0
Treatment
MSW compost incorporatione1
Outcome
Zn soil concentrationse1
Direction
increasede1
Comparator
peate1

Verbatim

e0

“southern highbush blueberry (Vaccinium corymbosum interspecific hybrid) cultivars were planted at a density of 10,000 plants per ha in southwest Florida”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 48–200 · show in text ↑
e1

“MSW compost incorporation increased P, Ca, Mg, Cu, Fe, Mn, and Zn soil concentrations compared with peat, but had no consistent effect on leaf nutrient concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1358–1524 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MSW compost had no consistent effect on leaf nutrient concentrations compared with peat.

Taxon
blueberrye0
Treatment
MSW compost incorporatione1
Outcome
leaf nutrient concentrationse1
Comparator
peate1

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“southern highbush blueberry (Vaccinium corymbosum interspecific hybrid) cultivars were planted at a density of 10,000 plants per ha in southwest Florida”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 48–200 · show in text ↑
e1

“MSW compost incorporation increased P, Ca, Mg, Cu, Fe, Mn, and Zn soil concentrations compared with peat, but had no consistent effect on leaf nutrient concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1358–1524 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant height and canopy volume were greater with MSW compost than with peat amendment.

Taxon
blueberrye0
Treatment
MSW composte1
Outcome
Plant height and canopy volumee1
Direction
greatere1
Comparator
peat amendmente1

Verbatim

e0

“southern highbush blueberry (Vaccinium corymbosum interspecific hybrid) cultivars were planted at a density of 10,000 plants per ha in southwest Florida”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 48–200 · show in text ↑
e1

“Plant height and canopy volume were consistently greater for plants grown in the MSW compost compared with the peat amendment, but there were no differences in leaf retention or vegetative budbreak between the two soil amendments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1526–1755 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf retention and vegetative budbreak did not differ between MSW compost and peat amendment.

Taxon
blueberrye0
Treatment
MSW composte1
Outcome
leaf retention or vegetative budbreake1
Comparator
peat amendmente1

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“southern highbush blueberry (Vaccinium corymbosum interspecific hybrid) cultivars were planted at a density of 10,000 plants per ha in southwest Florida”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 48–200 · show in text ↑
e1

“Plant height and canopy volume were consistently greater for plants grown in the MSW compost compared with the peat amendment, but there were no differences in leaf retention or vegetative budbreak between the two soil amendments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1526–1755 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plants in the non-dormant system showed no deleterious growth effects.

Taxon
blueberrye0
Outcome
growth effectse1
Qualifier
no deleteriouse1

Verbatim

e0

“southern highbush blueberry (Vaccinium corymbosum interspecific hybrid) cultivars were planted at a density of 10,000 plants per ha in southwest Florida”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 48–200 · show in text ↑
e1

“Plants in this non-dormant system have shown no deleterious growth effects, suggesting that establishing a blueberry planting in a warm winter climate is feasible under the described conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1757–1950 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Establishing a blueberry planting in a warm winter climate is feasible under the described conditions.

Taxon
blueberrye0
Outcome
establishing a blueberry planting in a warm winter climatee0
Qualifier
under the described conditionse0

Verbatim

e0

“Plants in this non-dormant system have shown no deleterious growth effects, suggesting that establishing a blueberry planting in a warm winter climate is feasible under the described conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1757–1950 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · nutrient: content · VacciniumPositive and negative results

5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

nitrogen · growth · VacciniumPositive and negative results

8 papers: 5 positive, 3 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · VacciniumPositive and negative results

17 papers: 10 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

fertilization · growth · VacciniumPositive and negative results

20 papers: 16 positive, 4 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

fertilization · phenology · VacciniumResults agree

3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.