Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Plant height and canopy volume were greater with MSW compost than with peat amendment.

A claim from Establishment of a non-dormant blueberry (Vaccinium corymbosumhybrid) production system in a warm winter climate · 1998

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant height and canopy volume were greater with MSW compost than with peat amendment.

Taxon
blueberrye0
Treatment
MSW composte1
Outcome
Plant height and canopy volumee1
Direction
greatere1
Comparator
peat amendmente1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Verbatim

e0

“southern highbush blueberry (Vaccinium corymbosum interspecific hybrid) cultivars were planted at a density of 10,000 plants per ha in southwest Florida”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 48–200
e1

“Plant height and canopy volume were consistently greater for plants grown in the MSW compost compared with the peat amendment, but there were no differences in leaf retention or vegetative budbreak between the two soil amendments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1526–1755

Title

Establishment of a non-dormant blueberry (Vaccinium corymbosumhybrid) production system in a warm winter climate

R. K. Reeder; T. A. Obreza; R. L. Darnell The Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology 1998. doi:10.1080/14620316.1998.11511029

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-ea32f3881ca5a1f6b9ecec11788b507baf27d60fcdb2abf1348409b1e8faf3ed · schema claims-v0.9 · position 9 in the model’s answer

fertilization · growth · VacciniumPositive and negative results

20 papers: 16 positive, 4 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this claim · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.