Paper · 1988 · Journal of Food Science

Effects of Gamma Irradiation Combined with Hot Dipping on Quality of “Kensington Pride” Mangoes

ANDREW J. JESSUP; CHRISTOPHER J. RIGNEY; PAMELA A. WILLS

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
6
citations
4
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

ABSTRACT Market mature “Kensington pride” mangoes, dipped in a benomyl solution (500 ppm a.i.) or in hot water at 527deg;C for 5 min, were irradiated in air at intervals of up to 42 hr after dipping at doses up to 1000 Gray (Gy). Irradiation retarded skin coloration, with a proportion of those dosed at 600 Gy and 10000Gy not coloring normally, and some developing undesirable skin bronzing at 1000 Gy. Irradiation did not affect flesh softening. Hot dip treatments accelerated skin coloration and the longer the interval between dipping and irradiation the more this was evident. Irradiation delayed ripe fruit rot in mangoes. A hot benomyl dip in combination with irradiation between 75 Gy and 600 Gy preserved fruit quality with negligible adverse phytotoxic Effects.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irradiation retarded mango skin coloration.

Taxon
MangoesMangifera indicat0
Treatment
Irradiatione0
Outcome
skin coloratione0
Direction
retardede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Mangoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–95 · show in text ↑
e0

“Irradiation retarded skin coloration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 230–266 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 600 Gy and 10000Gy, a proportion of mangoes failed to color normally.

Taxon
MangoesMangifera indicat0
Treatment
600 Gy and 10000Gye0
Outcome
not coloring normallye0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Mangoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–95 · show in text ↑
e0

“a proportion of those dosed at 600 Gy and 10000Gy not coloring normally”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 273–344 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 1000 Gy, some mangoes developed skin bronzing.

Taxon
MangoesMangifera indicat0
Treatment
1000 Gye0
Outcome
undesirable skin bronzinge0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Mangoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–95 · show in text ↑
e0

“some developing undesirable skin bronzing at 1000 Gy”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 350–402 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irradiation did not affect mango flesh softening.

Taxon
MangoesMangifera indicat0
Treatment
Irradiatione0
Outcome
flesh softeninge0
Direction
did not affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Mangoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–95 · show in text ↑
e0

“Irradiation did not affect flesh softening”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 404–446 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hot dips accelerated mango skin coloration.

Taxon
MangoesMangifera indicat0
Treatment
Hot dip treatmentse0
Outcome
skin coloratione0
Direction
acceleratede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Mangoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–95 · show in text ↑
e0

“Hot dip treatments accelerated skin coloration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 448–494 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Longer delays between hot dipping and irradiation further increased skin coloration acceleration.

Taxon
MangoesMangifera indicat0
Treatment
interval between dipping and irradiatione0
Outcome
skin coloratione1
Direction
acceleratede1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Mangoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–95 · show in text ↑
e0

“the longer the interval between dipping and irradiation the more this was evident”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 499–580 · show in text ↑
e1

“Hot dip treatments accelerated skin coloration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 448–494 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irradiation delayed ripe fruit rot in mangoes.

Taxon
mangoesMangifera indicae0
Treatment
Irradiatione0
Outcome
ripe fruit rote0
Direction
delayede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Irradiation delayed ripe fruit rot in mangoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 582–627 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hot benomyl dip plus 75–600 Gy irradiation preserved mango quality with negligible phytotoxic effects.

Taxon
MangoesMangifera indicat0
Treatment
A hot benomyl dip in combination with irradiation between 75 Gy and 600 Gye0
Outcome
fruit qualitye0
Direction
preservede0
Qualifier
negligible adverse phytotoxic Effectse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Mangoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–95 · show in text ↑
e0

“A hot benomyl dip in combination with irradiation between 75 Gy and 600 Gy preserved fruit quality with negligible adverse phytotoxic Effects”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 629–770 · show in text ↑

radiation · quality: postharvest · Mangifera indica (mango)Results differ

18 papers: 11 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

radiation · quality: grain · Mangifera indica (mango)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect

3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

radiation · disease · Mangifera indica (mango)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.