Abstract
A field experiment was conducted during 2009–10 and 2010–11 to study the effect of planting geometry and nitrogen levels on growth, yield and quality of sugarcane. Two spacings (S1-paired row planting 75/105 cm and S2-normal planting 90 cm) and four nitrogen levels applied through fertigation (D1-100% RDN, D2-75% RDN, D3-50% RDN and D4-Farmers practice) were tested in strip-plot design with three replications. Results revealed that paired row planting (75/105 cm) registered significantly higher cane girth, cane weight, millable cane population and cane yield over normal planting (90 cm) in both the years. Application of 100% recommended dose of nitrogen through fertigation was found superior than the other treatments with respect to yield attributes and cane yield during both the years. Quality of sugarcane was not influenced by crop geometry and nitrogen fertigation levels
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 8
Claim · model-written summary
Paired row planting significantly increased cane girth relative to normal planting.
Verbatim
e0“paired row planting (75/105 cm) registered significantly higher cane girth, cane weight, millable cane population and cane yield over normal planting (90 cm) in both the years”
t0“sugarcane”
Claim · model-written summary
Paired row planting significantly increased cane weight relative to normal planting.
Verbatim
e0“paired row planting (75/105 cm) registered significantly higher cane girth, cane weight, millable cane population and cane yield over normal planting (90 cm) in both the years”
t0“sugarcane”
Claim · model-written summary
Paired row planting significantly increased millable cane population relative to normal planting.
Verbatim
e0“paired row planting (75/105 cm) registered significantly higher cane girth, cane weight, millable cane population and cane yield over normal planting (90 cm) in both the years”
t0“sugarcane”
Claim · model-written summary
Paired row planting significantly increased cane yield relative to normal planting.
Verbatim
e0“paired row planting (75/105 cm) registered significantly higher cane girth, cane weight, millable cane population and cane yield over normal planting (90 cm) in both the years”
t0“sugarcane”
Claim · model-written summary
The full recommended nitrogen dose through fertigation was superior for yield attributes.
Verbatim
e0“Application of 100% recommended dose of nitrogen through fertigation was found superior than the other treatments with respect to yield attributes and cane yield during both the years”
t0“sugarcane”
Claim · model-written summary
The full recommended nitrogen dose through fertigation was superior for cane yield.
Verbatim
e0“Application of 100% recommended dose of nitrogen through fertigation was found superior than the other treatments with respect to yield attributes and cane yield during both the years”
t0“sugarcane”
Claim · model-written summary
Crop geometry did not influence sugarcane quality.
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“Quality of sugarcane was not influenced by crop geometry and nitrogen fertigation levels”
Claim · model-written summary
Nitrogen fertigation levels did not influence sugarcane quality.
- Taxon
- sugarcanee0
- Treatment
- nitrogen fertigation levelse0
- Outcome
- Quality of sugarcanee0
- Direction
- not influencede0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“Quality of sugarcane was not influenced by crop geometry and nitrogen fertigation levels”
The same questions in other papers
nitrogen · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results differ
117 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- negative
133 papers more in this group
See all 137 papers →nitrogen · quality: general · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results
9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
17 papers more in this group
See all 21 papers →fertilization · quality: general · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results
15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
32 papers more in this group
See all 36 papers →fertilization · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results
311 papers in the same direction as this paper · 28 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
342 papers more in this group
See all 346 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.