Paper · 2006 · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

From Field to Health: A Simple Way To Increase the Nutraceutical Content of Grape As Shown by NO-Dependent Vascular Relaxation

Francesca Fumagalli; Mara Rossoni; Marcello Iriti; et al.

5
claims
8
verbatim quotes
42
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Polyphenolic grapevine components involved in plant resistance against pathogens possess various pharmacological properties that include nitric oxide (NO)-dependent vasodilation and anti-inflammatory and free radical scavenging activities, which may explain the protective effect of moderate red wine consumption against cardiovascular disease. The aim of this work was (a) to verify the possibility that preharvest treatments of grapevine with a plant activator, benzo-(1,2,3)-thiadiazole-7-carbothioic acid S-methyl ester (BTH), could lead to an enriched nutraceutical potential of wine and (b) to characterize the profile of metabolites responsible for pharmacological activity. Plant spraying at the end of veraison, with a water suspension of BTH (0.3 mM), led to increased whole anthocyanin content as confirmed by HPLC comparative analysis. Extracts from berry skins of BTH-treated grapevines caused NO-dependent vasorelaxation, with a concentration-response curve that was significantly shifted to the left of the control non-BTH-treated curve. Moreover, 1:1000 dilutions of berry extracts from BTH-treated plants significantly increased basal production of guanosine 3',5'-cyclic monophosphate (cGMP) in human vascular endothelial cells when compared to the corresponding extracts of untreated plants. These results show that BTH treatment increases anthocyanin content of grape extracts, as well as their ability to induce NO-mediated vasoprotection. No increase of anthocyanin content was observed in the wine extracts from BTH-treated vines. It is concluded that BTH treatment could be exploited to increase the nutraceutical potential of grapes.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BTH spraying increased whole anthocyanin content.

Taxon
Grapet0
Organ / stage
end of veraisone0
Treatment
BTH (0.3 mM)e0
Outcome
whole anthocyanin contente0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Plant spraying at the end of veraison, with a water suspension of BTH (0.3 mM), led to increased whole anthocyanin content as confirmed by HPLC comparative analysis.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 682–847 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Berry skin extracts from BTH-treated grapevines produced a left-shifted NO-dependent vasorelaxation response.

Taxon
grapevinesVitise0
Organ / stage
berry skinse0
Treatment
BTH-treatede0
Outcome
NO-dependent vasorelaxatione0
Direction
shifted to the lefte0
Comparator
control non-BTH-treatede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Extracts from berry skins of BTH-treated grapevines caused NO-dependent vasorelaxation, with a concentration-response curve that was significantly shifted to the left of the control non-BTH-treated curve.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 848–1052 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Berry extracts from BTH-treated plants increased basal cGMP production in human endothelial cells versus untreated-plant extracts.

Taxon
Grapet0
Treatment
BTH-treated plantse0
Outcome
basal production of guanosine 3',5'-cyclic monophosphate (cGMP) in human vascular endothelial cellse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
1:1000 dilutionse0
Comparator
untreated plantse0

Verbatim

e0

“1:1000 dilutions of berry extracts from BTH-treated plants significantly increased basal production of guanosine 3',5'-cyclic monophosphate (cGMP) in human vascular endothelial cells when compared to the corresponding extracts of untreated plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1063–1310 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BTH did not increase anthocyanin content in wine extracts.

Taxon
Grapet0
Treatment
BTH-treated vinese0
Outcome
anthocyanin contente0
Direction
No increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“No increase of anthocyanin content was observed in the wine extracts from BTH-treated vines.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1461–1553 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–81 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors propose BTH treatment to increase the nutraceutical potential of grapes.

Taxon
grapese0
Treatment
BTH treatmente0
Outcome
increase the nutraceutical potential of grapese0

Verbatim

e0

“It is concluded that BTH treatment could be exploited to increase the nutraceutical potential of grapes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1554–1658 · show in text ↑

acibenzolar-S-methyl · quality: phytochemicals · VitisResults agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.