Paper · 2014 · Agricultural Sciences

Growth, Nutrient Uptake Efficiency and Yield of Upland Rice as Influenced by Two Compost Types in Tropical Rainforest-Derived Savannah Transition Zone

Oyeyemi Adigun Dada; Adeniyi Olumuyiwa Togun; James Alabi Adediran; et al.

8
claims
17
verbatim quotes
9
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Cultivating traditional upland rice cultivars on nutrient depleted soil causes poor and low yield. Little attention is paid to performance of inter-specific NERICA cultivars grown on nutrient deficient soil augmented with different types of compost. Therefore, field trials were conducted during 2010 and 2011 planting seasons in Ibadan to evaluate growth, dry matter, nutrient uptake efficiency and grain yield of upland rice grown on nutrient deficient soil augmented with different types of compost. There were nine treatments comprising of three upland rice cultivars: NERICA I, NERICA II and Ofada, two compost types applied at the rate of 8 t·ha-1: poultry dropping + maize stover (PDMC) and cattle dung + maize stover (CDMC) and control. The treatments were laid out in randomized complete block design and replicated three times. CDMC enhanced growth, nutrient use efficiency, dry matter and grain yield of upland rice cultivars. Performance of Ofada was better than NERICA cultivars. N (24.55 g), P (12.45 g) and K (35.41 g) uptake concentration and grain yield (5.45 t/ha) were highest in Ofada plots augmented with CDMC. Residual effect of compost on growth, yield and nutrient uptake efficiency of upland rice on nutrient deficient soil was marginal.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cattle dung plus maize stover compost (CDMC) enhanced growth, nutrient use efficiency and dry matter of upland rice compared with control.

Taxon
upland riceOryza sativae1
Treatment
cattle dung + maize stover (CDMC)e2
Outcome
growth, nutrient use efficiency, dry mattere1
Direction
enhancede1
Comparator
controle2
Setting
Ibadane3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“CDMC enhanced growth, nutrient use efficiency, dry matter and grain yield of upland rice cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 838–936 · show in text ↑
e2

“applied at the rate of 8 t·ha-1: poultry dropping + maize stover (PDMC) and cattle dung + maize stover (CDMC) and control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 622–743 · show in text ↑
e3

“field trials were conducted during 2010 and 2011 planting seasons in Ibadan”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 261–336 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cattle dung plus maize stover compost (CDMC) enhanced grain yield of upland rice compared with control.

Taxon
upland riceOryza sativae1
Treatment
cattle dung + maize stover (CDMC)e2
Outcome
grain yielde1
Direction
enhancede1
Comparator
controle2
Setting
Ibadane3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“CDMC enhanced growth, nutrient use efficiency, dry matter and grain yield of upland rice cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 838–936 · show in text ↑
e2

“applied at the rate of 8 t·ha-1: poultry dropping + maize stover (PDMC) and cattle dung + maize stover (CDMC) and control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 622–743 · show in text ↑
e3

“field trials were conducted during 2010 and 2011 planting seasons in Ibadan”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 261–336 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The Ofada upland rice cultivar performed better than the NERICA cultivars.

Taxon
Upland RiceOryza sativat0
Material
Ofadae4
Outcome
Performancee4
Direction
bettere4
Comparator
NERICA cultivarse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Yield of Upland Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–59 · show in text ↑
e4

“Performance of Ofada was better than NERICA cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 938–991 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Uptake concentration of N (24.55 g) was highest in Ofada upland rice plots augmented with CDMC.

Taxon
Upland RiceOryza sativat0
Material
Ofadae5
Treatment
CDMCe5
Outcome
uptake concentratione5
Direction
higheste5
Value
24.55 ge5
Qualifier
Ne5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Yield of Upland Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–59 · show in text ↑
e5

“N (24.55 g), P (12.45 g) and K (35.41 g) uptake concentration and grain yield (5.45 t/ha) were highest in Ofada plots augmented with CDMC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 993–1130 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Uptake concentration of P (12.45 g) was highest in Ofada upland rice plots augmented with CDMC.

Taxon
Upland RiceOryza sativat0
Material
Ofadae5
Treatment
CDMCe5
Outcome
uptake concentratione5
Direction
higheste5
Value
12.45 ge5
Qualifier
Pe5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Yield of Upland Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–59 · show in text ↑
e5

“N (24.55 g), P (12.45 g) and K (35.41 g) uptake concentration and grain yield (5.45 t/ha) were highest in Ofada plots augmented with CDMC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 993–1130 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Uptake concentration of K (35.41 g) was highest in Ofada upland rice plots augmented with CDMC.

Taxon
Upland RiceOryza sativat0
Material
Ofadae5
Treatment
CDMCe5
Outcome
uptake concentratione5
Direction
higheste5
Value
35.41 ge5
Qualifier
Ke5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Yield of Upland Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–59 · show in text ↑
e5

“N (24.55 g), P (12.45 g) and K (35.41 g) uptake concentration and grain yield (5.45 t/ha) were highest in Ofada plots augmented with CDMC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 993–1130 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield (5.45 t/ha) was highest in Ofada upland rice plots augmented with CDMC.

Taxon
Upland RiceOryza sativat0
Material
Ofadae5
Treatment
CDMCe5
Outcome
grain yielde5
Direction
higheste5
Value
5.45 t/hae5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Yield of Upland Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–59 · show in text ↑
e5

“N (24.55 g), P (12.45 g) and K (35.41 g) uptake concentration and grain yield (5.45 t/ha) were highest in Ofada plots augmented with CDMC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 993–1130 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The residual effect of compost on growth, yield and nutrient uptake efficiency of upland rice on nutrient-deficient soil was marginal.

Taxon
upland riceOryza sativae6
Treatment
composte6
Outcome
growth, yield and nutrient uptake efficiencye6
Direction
marginale6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“Residual effect of compost on growth, yield and nutrient uptake efficiency of upland rice on nutrient deficient soil was marginal”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1132–1261 · show in text ↑

Zea mays · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

40 papers: 32 positive, 8 negative or no effect

31 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

36 papers more in this group

See all 40 papers →

Zea mays · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

fertilization · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

3,455 papers: 3,183 positive, 272 negative or no effect

271 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3,183 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3,451 papers more in this group

See all 3,455 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.