Paper · 1966 · Agronomy Journal

Boron Fertilization of Corn in Minnesota1

J. R. Peterson; J. M. MacGregor

8
claims
11
verbatim quotes
9
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Six fields (5 soil types) of corn were treated with soluble boron at different rates and methods of application during 1961 and 1962. A fritted trace element treatment (FTE‐502) was included in 1961, but a lighter application of FTE‐504 in 1962. No boron deficiency symptoms were observed at any growth stage, either on the corn foliage or on the ears. Leaf B concentrations on untreated soil were generally related to soluble soil B. Boron applied either in the corn row or as foliar spray resulted in the highest leaf B concentrations and broadcast B resulted in a lower level. Upper corn leaves sampled in mid‐August were highest in B. Optimum leaf sampling at this time is suggested. These five Minnesota soils, having a water‐soluble B content of 0.33 to 1.58 ppm, apparently do not require B applications for maximum corn production at this time.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No boron deficiency symptoms were observed on corn foliage or ears.

Organ / stage
corn foliage or on the earse0
Outcome
No boron deficiency symptomse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No boron deficiency symptoms were observed at any growth stage, either on the corn foliage or on the ears.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 255–361 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–27 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf B concentrations on untreated corn soil were generally related to soluble soil B.

Compound
soluble soil Be0
Outcome
Leaf B concentrationse0
Comparator
untreated soile0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leaf B concentrations on untreated soil were generally related to soluble soil B.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 362–443 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–27 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Row applied boron produced the highest leaf B concentrations.

Treatment
Boron applied either in the corn rowe0
Outcome
leaf B concentrationse0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
broadcast Be0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Boron applied either in the corn row or as foliar spray resulted in the highest leaf B concentrations and broadcast B resulted in a lower level.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 444–588 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar boron spray produced the highest leaf B concentrations.

Treatment
foliar spraye0
Outcome
leaf B concentrationse0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
broadcast Be0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Boron applied either in the corn row or as foliar spray resulted in the highest leaf B concentrations and broadcast B resulted in a lower level.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 444–588 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Broadcast boron gave a lower leaf B level than row or foliar application.

Treatment
broadcast Be0
Outcome
leaf B concentrationse0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
Boron applied either in the corn row or as foliar spraye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Boron applied either in the corn row or as foliar spray resulted in the highest leaf B concentrations and broadcast B resulted in a lower level.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 444–588 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Upper corn leaves sampled in mid-August had the highest B.

Organ / stage
Upper corn leavese0
Outcome
Be0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
mid‐Auguste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Upper corn leaves sampled in mid‐August were highest in B.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 589–647 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest sampling corn leaves in mid-August.

Outcome
Optimum leaf samplinge0
Qualifier
mid‐Auguste1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Optimum leaf sampling at this time is suggested.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 648–696 · show in text ↑
e1

“Upper corn leaves sampled in mid‐August were highest in B.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 589–647 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that the five Minnesota soils do not currently need B application for maximum corn production.

Outcome
do not require B applications for maximum corn productione0
Value
0.33 to 1.58 ppme0
Setting
Minnesotae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These five Minnesota soils, having a water‐soluble B content of 0.33 to 1.58 ppm, apparently do not require B applications for maximum corn production at this time.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 697–861 · show in text ↑

boron atom · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

26 papers: 18 positive, 8 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

Zea mays subsp. mays · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

37 papers: 25 positive, 12 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

33 papers more in this group

See all 37 papers →

application · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

161 papers: 151 positive, 10 negative or no effect

150 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

157 papers more in this group

See all 161 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.