Abstract

Hot weather can substantially reduce pod production by cowpea [ Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.]. The objectives were to characterize and classify cowpea based on their responses to heat during reproductive development. Diverse cowpea accessions were grown over six summers in Imperial Valley, CA under hot temperatures (mean daily max/min 41/24 °C) and long days (14 h, 51 min decreasing to 12 h, 18 min). Selected genotypes were grown at Riverside, CA, under more optimal temperatures (35/17 °C) and the same daylengths. At Imperial Valley, genotypic variation was observed for duration to first macroscopic floral bud and extent of floral bud abortion, peduncle elongation, flower production, and podding. At Riverside, similar genotypic variation occurred for days to first floral bud, but subsequent reproductive development was normal. Controlled environment studies in growth chambers showed that the detrimental effects induced in sensitive genotypes by high temperature were enhanced by long photoperiods. Based on these differing reproductive responses, the accessions were classified into eight groups. Heat‐tolerant accessions in Group I exhibited normal peduncle elongation, early flowering, and produced many flowers and pods. Accessions in Groups II and III performed similarly but set few pods (Group II) or no pods (Group III). Accessions in Groups IV through VII differed in duration to first floral bud, with Group VII being the latest and exhibiting substantial bud abortion, suppressed peduncle elongation, and no flowers. Group VIII accessions produced no visible floral buds. Cowpea developed in different regions and for specific seasons within a region fell into discrete classification groups, indicating that the system has a genetic and ecological basis. This classification system is useful for characterizing the types of heat responses present in cowpea genotypes and for selecting appropriate combinations of parents for breeding heat‐tolerant cultivars for different production zones and seasons.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At Imperial Valley, cowpea genotypes varied in timing of first floral bud and floral bud abortion.

Outcome
duration to first macroscopic floral bud and extent of floral bud abortione0
Setting
Imperial Valleye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At Imperial Valley, genotypic variation was observed for duration to first macroscopic floral bud and extent of floral bud abortion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 520–651 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–48 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At Imperial Valley, genotypes varied in peduncle elongation, flower production, and podding.

Outcome
peduncle elongation, flower production, and poddinge0
Setting
Imperial Valleye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At Imperial Valley, genotypic variation was observed for duration to first macroscopic floral bud and extent of floral bud abortion, peduncle elongation, flower production, and podding”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 520–704 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–48 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At Riverside, genotypes varied in days to first floral bud.

Outcome
days to first floral bude0
Setting
Riversidee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At Riverside, similar genotypic variation occurred for days to first floral bud”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 706–785 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–48 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Subsequent reproductive development at Riverside was normal.

Outcome
subsequent reproductive development was normale0
Setting
Riversidee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At Riverside, similar genotypic variation occurred for days to first floral bud, but subsequent reproductive development was normal”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 706–837 · show in text ↑
t0

“Genotypic Variation and Classification of Cowpea for Reproductive Responses to High Temperature under Long Photoperiods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–119 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Long photoperiods enhanced high temperature damage in sensitive genotypes.

Treatment
long photoperiodse0
Outcome
detrimental effects induced in sensitive genotypes by high temperaturee0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the detrimental effects induced in sensitive genotypes by high temperature were enhanced by long photoperiods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 901–1010 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–48 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The accessions were classified into eight reproductive-response groups.

Outcome
classified into eight groupse0
Value
eight groupse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the accessions were classified into eight groups”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1061–1109 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–48 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Group I accessions had normal peduncle elongation, flowered early, and made many flowers and pods.

Material
Group Ie0
Outcome
normal peduncle elongation, early flowering, and produced many flowers and podse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Heat‐tolerant accessions in Group I exhibited normal peduncle elongation, early flowering, and produced many flowers and pods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1111–1236 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–48 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Group II accessions set few pods.

Material
Group IIe0
Outcome
few podse0
Direction
fewe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“set few pods (Group II)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1294–1317 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–48 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Group III accessions set no pods.

Material
Group IIIe0
Outcome
no podse0
Direction
noe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“no pods (Group III)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1321–1340 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–48 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Group VII was latest to form first buds, with substantial abortion, suppressed peduncle elongation and no flowers.

Material
Group VIIe0
Outcome
substantial bud abortion, suppressed peduncle elongation, and no flowerse0
Direction
suppressede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Group VII being the latest and exhibiting substantial bud abortion, suppressed peduncle elongation, and no flowers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1425–1539 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–48 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Group VIII accessions formed no visible floral buds.

Material
Group VIIIe0
Outcome
no visible floral budse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Group VIII accessions produced no visible floral buds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1541–1594 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–48 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Regional and seasonal origins fell into discrete reproductive classes.

Outcome
discrete classification groupse0
Setting
different regionse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cowpea developed in different regions and for specific seasons within a region fell into discrete classification groups”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1596–1715 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors consider the classification useful for characterizing heat responses and selecting breeding parents.

Outcome
selecting appropriate combinations of parents for breeding heat‐tolerant cultivarse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This classification system is useful for characterizing the types of heat responses present in cowpea genotypes and for selecting appropriate combinations of parents for breeding heat‐tolerant cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1780–1982 · show in text ↑