Paper · 2013 · Biology and Fertility of Soils

Nitrogen supply from belowground residues of lentil and wheat to a subsequent wheat crop

Melissa M. Arcand; Reynald Lemke; Richard E. Farrell; et al.

9
claims
13
verbatim quotes
43
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Lentil ( Lens culinaris ) production on the Canadian prairies has increased recently with possible benefits to cropping systems in this region. The yield benefit often observed in cereals grown after a pulse crop can be partially attributed to the supply of nitrogen (N) from decomposing pulse crop residues; however, the contribution of belowground residue (BGR) is poorly documented. The purpose of this greenhouse study was to quantify the N input from BGR (i.e., roots plus rhizodeposits) of lentil and wheat ( Triticum aestivum ) using shoot 15 N-labeling and to trace the 15 N from BGR into subsequently grown wheat plants. Belowground N (BGN) comprised 34 and 51 % of total plant N in lentil and wheat, respectively. Whereas wheat produced more root biomass than lentil, total amounts of BGN did not differ between species. However, biomass production and N uptake by wheat grown on lentil BGR were 49 and 14 % higher than wheat grown on wheat BGR. Moreover, a higher proportion of added 15 N from lentil BGR (14.4 vs. 8.5 %) was recovered in the succeeding wheat crop, indicating that lentil BGN was more readily mineralized than wheat BGN. The disproportionately high increase in yield vs. N uptake for wheat grown on lentil BGR, however, indicates that non-N factors also contributed to the increase in wheat yield. This study highlights the importance of including estimates of BGN when evaluating the positive effects of including pulse crops in rotation with cereals, although further research is required to identify non-N benefits of lentil.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Belowground N comprised 34 percent of total plant N in lentil.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise2
Outcome
Belowground N (BGN)e2
Value
34e2
Setting
greenhouse studye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The purpose of this greenhouse study was to quantify the N input from BGR”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 386–459 · show in text ↑
e2

“Belowground N (BGN) comprised 34 and 51 % of total plant N in lentil and wheat, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 630–722 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Belowground N comprised 51 percent of total plant N in wheat.

Outcome
Belowground N (BGN)e2
Value
51 %e2
Setting
greenhouse studye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The purpose of this greenhouse study was to quantify the N input from BGR”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 386–459 · show in text ↑
e2

“Belowground N (BGN) comprised 34 and 51 % of total plant N in lentil and wheat, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 630–722 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat produced more root biomass than lentil.

Outcome
root biomasse3
Direction
moree3
Comparator
lentile3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Whereas wheat produced more root biomass than lentil, total amounts of BGN did not differ between species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 724–829 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total belowground N did not differ between lentil and wheat.

Outcome
total amounts of BGNe3
Direction
did not differe3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The purpose of this greenhouse study was to quantify the N input from BGR”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 386–459 · show in text ↑
e1

“to quantify the N input from BGR (i.e., roots plus rhizodeposits) of lentil and wheat ( Triticum aestivum ) using shoot 15 N-labeling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 427–560 · show in text ↑
e3

“Whereas wheat produced more root biomass than lentil, total amounts of BGN did not differ between species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 724–829 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biomass production of wheat grown on lentil BGR was 49 percent higher than on wheat BGR.

Treatment
lentil BGRe4
Outcome
biomass productione4
Direction
highere4
Value
49e4
Comparator
wheat BGRe4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“biomass production and N uptake by wheat grown on lentil BGR were 49 and 14 % higher than wheat grown on wheat BGR”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 840–954 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N uptake by wheat grown on lentil BGR was 14 percent higher than on wheat BGR.

Treatment
lentil BGRe4
Outcome
N uptakee4
Direction
highere4
Value
14 %e4
Comparator
wheat BGRe4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“biomass production and N uptake by wheat grown on lentil BGR were 49 and 14 % higher than wheat grown on wheat BGR”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 840–954 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A higher proportion of added 15N from lentil BGR was recovered in the succeeding wheat crop than from wheat BGN.

Treatment
lentil BGRe5
Outcome
proportion of added 15 Ne5
Direction
highere5
Value
14.4e5
Qualifier
vs. 8.5 %e5
Comparator
wheat BGNe5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“a higher proportion of added 15 N from lentil BGR (14.4 vs. 8.5 %) was recovered in the succeeding wheat crop, indicating that lentil BGN was more readily mineralized than wheat BGN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 966–1147 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The disproportionate yield increase of wheat grown on lentil BGR indicates that non-N factors also contributed.

Outcome
yielde6
Qualifier
non-N factors also contributede6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“The disproportionately high increase in yield vs. N uptake for wheat grown on lentil BGR, however, indicates that non-N factors also contributed to the increase in wheat yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1149–1324 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Estimates of belowground N should be included when evaluating pulse crops in rotation with cereals.

Taxon
pulse cropse7
Outcome
estimates of BGNe7

Verbatim

e7

“This study highlights the importance of including estimates of BGN when evaluating the positive effects of including pulse crops in rotation with cereals”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1326–1479 · show in text ↑

Lens culinaris · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 9 positive, 4 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

Lens culinaris · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.